Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3326 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have come across the following article which I thought might be of use to folk.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2981794/10-minute-let-avoid-parking-ticket-month-new-law-let-overstay-meter-without-fine.html

 

 

 

No parking fine if you overstay by just 10 minutes: New law next month will give you extra time before wardens pounce

 

Drivers are to get ten minutes extra time after a parking ticket runs out before they can be hit with a fine.

 

Under a change in the law to take effect within weeks, they will have the right to a ‘grace period’ in all on-street or off-street council parking places.

 

For decades, drivers have complained of returning to their cars moments after a ticket expires to find a prowling warden has already hit them with a penalty.

 

 

 

Edited by citizenB
added a bit of content

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's also an election very soon!

 

Sam

All of these are on behalf of a friend.. Cabot - [There's no CCA!]

CapQuest - [There's no CCA!]

Barclays - Zinc, [There's no CCA!]

Robinson Way - Written off!

NatWest - Written off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's also an election very soon!

 

Sam

 

Do I detect a cynic in there somewhere :lol:

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

So a 60 minute ticket in effect becomes a 70 minute ticket. Doesn't solve the problem - it just moves it 10 minutes down the line.

 

What's the betting they slap the ticket at 70 minutes and one second. There will still be the 'over zealous' type who will hang around just to penalise the accidental overstayer.

I do hope this will slow down the 'cash cow' mentality of some councils.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will also put up the cost of parking for 'honest' drivers as the 10 mins free will have to be budgeted for. If its now 60p an hour for every hour the Council gets 60p, with the new system you only need to pay 50p for 50 mins and get 10 mins free giving you an hour for 50p. The Council would therefore need to make parking 70p an hour to get the same income, obviously you could gamble and pay less and hope you didn't miss the 10 min cut off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will also put up the cost of parking for 'honest' drivers as the 10 mins free will have to be budgeted for. If its now 60p an hour for every hour the Council gets 60p, with the new system you only need to pay 50p for 50 mins and get 10 mins free giving you an hour for 50p. The Council would therefore need to make parking 70p an hour to get the same income, obviously you could gamble and pay less and hope you didn't miss the 10 min cut off.

 

That is a fair point.

 

There is the other issue where people overpay as they don't have enough change. Most councils will just keep it.Would that not equal out the new rules?

 

I did read of one council that donated the excess to a charity.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all of dubious merit. Charities often do the same sort of work as councils anyway, providing children's services, shelter for homeless people etc. There is an argument that the council would be better off keeping it and spending it themselves - although it's debatable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all of dubious merit. Charities often do the same sort of work as councils anyway, providing children's services, shelter for homeless people etc. There is an argument that the council would be better off keeping it and spending it themselves - although it's debatable.

 

 

 

Exactly, I never understand the allegations of 'money grabbing' Councils ripping people off. They are a non profit making organisation all the money they receive is ploughed back into the local community. Sometimes they may make some odd choices when spending the money but far less worrying to me than charities employing fund raisers on 6 figure salaries.

 

 

Free bays are also included in the scheme which is a complete nonsense if a bay is 20 mins free that's what you should get, if you give 10 mins grace it becomes 30 mins free which is not what it says on the sign. So mr Pickles thinks somehow adding ten minutes to every free bay is going to help drivers, all that will happen is drivers will just add on the ten minutes and still get caught out. Councils on the other hand who are trying to manage parking schemes and actually wish to restrict free parking to allow for picking up passengers at stations, popping in convenience stores etc will have to change all the traffic orders and signs to reduce the signed allowance by 10 minutes to allow for the 10 free extra overstay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
So a 60 minute ticket in effect becomes a 70 minute ticket. Doesn't solve the problem - it just moves it 10 minutes down the line.

 

Precisely. They brought this 10 minute thing in in Dublin (where the default answer to overstaying your parking ticket is a clamp) and that's what happened. The council's parking website is now plastered with "there is no grace period on the grace period" and variants on same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should charge £10 for an overstay, plus £1 per minute until the full charge for the PCN is reached, and that's the final cap. That would be proportionate to the contravention and not hit accidental overstayers unduly hard. A 2 minute overstay would be £10 + £2. A 20 minute overstay would be £10 + £20.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...