Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning, I purchased a car from Big Motoring World on 10th December 2023 for £14899.00. On the 15th December I had a problem with the auto start stop function of the car in which the car would stop in the middle of the road with a stop start error message. I called the big assist and the car was booked in for February. The BMW was with them for a week and it came back with the auto stop start feature all fine and all error codes cleared on the report from big motoring world. within 5 days I had the same issue. Warning light coming on and the car stopping. I called big assist again and the car was again booked in for an other repair in May. Car was taken back in may, they had the car for a week and returned with the report saying no issue with the auto stop start feature and blamed my driving. Within 5 days of having the car back it broke down again. This time undrivable. I had the rac pick my car up and take to Stephen James BMW for a full diagnostic. The diagnostic came back with the car needing a new fuel system as magnetic swarf was found.  I have sent big motoring world a letter stating all the issues and that under the consumer rights act 2015 I have asked for a replacement vehicle. all reports from Stephen James BMW have been sent over to big motoring world. Big motoring world have come back and said they will respond to my complaint within 14 days for the date of my complaint letter. I am not feeling confident on the response from them, what are my next steps?   Thanks in advance. 
    • That is really good is that a mistake last off "driver doesn't have a licence" I assume that should be keeper? The Court requested me to send the Court and applicant proof of my sons disability from their GP this clearly shows he has Severe Mental Impairement, he is also illiterate.  I naively assumed once the applicant received this that they would drop the claim.  It offends me that Bank has asked the Judge to throw the case out at the preliminary hearing and to make us pay up.
    • Hi, we are looking to get some opinions on weather or not to bother fighting this PCN. This comes from a very big retail park parking where there are restaurants, hotel, amongst other businesses. The parking is free but I suppose there must be a time limit on it that I am not aware of. We were in the area for around 4 hours. Makes us wonder how they deal with people staying in the hotel as the ANPR is on what appears to be a publicly maintained street (where london buses run) which leads to the different parking areas including the hotel.  1 Date of the infringement 26/05/2024 2 Date on the NTK  31/05/2024 3 Date received 07/06/2024 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]  YES 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Entry and exit photos however, based on the photographs we are almost sure the photos are taken on public street. This is the location I believe photos are taken from.  https://maps.app.goo.gl/eii8zSmFFhVZDRpbA 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A 7 Who is the parking company? UKPA. UK Parking Administration LTD 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] The Colonnades, Croydon, CR0 4RQ For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. British Parking Association (BPA) Thanks in advance for any assistance.  UKPA PCN The Collonades-redacted.pdf
    • Thank you for posting their WS. If we start with the actual WS made by the director one would have doubts that they had even read PoFA let alone understood it. Point 10  we only have the word of the director that the contract has been extended. I should have had the corroboration of the Client. Point 12 The Judge HHJ Simkiss was not the usual Judge on motoring cases and his decisions on the necessity of contracts did not align with PoFA. In Schedule 4 [1[ it is quite clearly spelt out- “relevant contract” means a contract (including a contract arising only when the vehicle was parked on the relevant land) between the driver and a person who is—(a)the owner or occupier of the land; or (b authorised, under or  by virtue of arrangements made by the owner or occupier of the land, to enter into a contract with the driver requiring the payment of parking charges in respect of the parking of the vehicle on the land; And the laughable piece of paper from the land owners cannot be described as a contract. I respectfully ask that the case be dismissed as there is no contract. WE do not even know what the parking regulations are which is really basic. It is respectfully asked that without a valid contract the case cannot continue. One would imagine that were there a valid contract it would have been produced.  So the contract that Bank has with the motorist must come from the landowner. Bank on their own cannot impose their own contract. How could a director of a parking company sign a Statement of Truth which included Point 11. Point 14. There is no offer of a contract at the entrance to the car park. Doubtful if it is even an offer to treat. The entrance sign sign does not comply with the IPC Code of Conduct nor is there any indication that ANPR cameras are in force. A major fault and breach of GDPR. Despite the lack of being offered a contract at the entrance [and how anyone could see what was offered by way of a contract in the car park is impossible owing to none of the signs in the WS being at all legible] payment was made for the car to park. A young person in the car made the payment. But before they did that, they helped an elderly lady to make her payment as she was having difficulty. After arranging payment for the lady the young lad made his payment right behind. Unfortunately he entered the old lady's number again rather than paying .for the car he was in. This can be confirmed by looking at the Allow List print out on page 25. The defendant's car arrived at 12.49 and at 12.51 and 12.52  there are two payments for the same vrm. This was also remarked on by the IPC adjudicator when the PCN was appealed.  So it is quite disgraceful that Bank have continued to pursue the Defendant knowing that it was a question of  entering the wrong vrm.  Point 21 The Defendant is not obliged to name the driver, they are only invited to do so under S9[2][e]. Also it is unreasonable to assume that the keeper is the driver. The Courts do not do that for good reason. The keeper in this case does not have a driving licence. Point 22. The Defendant DID make a further appeal which though it was also turned down their reply was very telling and should have led to the charge being dropped were the company not greedy and willing to pursue the Defendant regardless of the evidence they had in their own hands. Point 23 [111] it's a bit rich asking the Defendant to act justly and at proportionate cost while acting completely unjustly themselves and then adding an unlawful 70% on to the invoice. This  is despite PoFA S4[5] (5)The maximum sum which may be recovered from the keeper by virtue of the right conferred by this paragraph is the amount specified in the notice to keeper under paragraph 9[2][d].  Point 23 [1v] the Director can deny all he wants but the PCN does not comply with PoFA. S9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN only quotes the ANPR arrival and departure times which obviously includes a fair amount of driving between the two cameras. Plus the driver and passengers are a mixture of disabled and aged persons who require more time than just a young fit single driver to exit the car and later re enter. So the ANPR times cannot be the same as the required parking period as stipulated in the ACT. Moreover in S9[2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; You will note that in the PCN the words in parentheses are not included but at the start of Section 9 the word "must" is included. As there are two faults in the PCN it follows that Bank cannot pursue the keeper . And as the driver does not have a driving licence their case must fail on that alone. And that is not even taking into consideration that the payment was made. Point 23 [v] your company is wrong a payment was made. very difficult to prove a cash payment two weeks later when the PCN arrives. However the evidence was in your print out for anyone to see had they actually done due diligence prior to writing to the DVLA. Indeed as the Defendant had paid there was no reasonable cause to have applied for the keeper details. Point 24 the Defendant did not breach the contract. The PCN claimed the Defendant failed to make a payment when they had made a payment.   I haven't finished yet but that is something to start with
    • You don't appeal to anyone. You haven't' received a demand from a statutory body like the council, the police or the courts. It's just a dodgy cowboy company trying it on. You simply don't pay.  In the vast majority of these cases the company deforest the Amazon with threats about how they are going to divert a drone from Ukraine and make it land on your home - but in the end they do nothing.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tribunal for a JSA sanction for not receiving a MWA letter


Emma078
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3427 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I'm after any advice

 

I have posted on here before about MWA I had been told to go to.

 

 

I was told to go to a charity shop and on the day my neighbour gave me a lift there,

 

 

I was late and the woman was horrible having a go at my neighbour and

I walked out embarrassed and ashamed (so was my neighbour - he was shocked that someone 'volunteering' would get spoken to like that)

I ended up getting a 13 week sanction

 

Then in April I was told to do MWA again.

 

 

I got a letter from learn direct saying they'd be in touch for me to come in and see them.

 

 

I signed on twice after that and was just asked if I'd heard anything yet to which I told them about the letter.

Then the day I supposed to get paid there was nothing in my bank.

 

 

I rang the jobcentre to be told I should of started MWA and I'd failed to turn up and told them I'd not had anything telling me to start.

It didn't matter I got a 13 week sanction.

 

I went to see the welfare person at the council who did a mandatory reconsideration

and I applied for hardship

 

I was then told to do MWA again, this time I got 2 letters telling me to start a charity shop on Monday (letters received Saturday)

but this was in a different town and I'm only getting £35 a week and bus fare was much more than this so I didn't go.

 

 

I've now received a 6 month sanction.

 

 

I have sent a mandatory reconsideration for this saying the guidance wasn't meet

- that I should have a timetable saying the hours. (but I know I wont win)

 

But the sanction for the letter not received has not been lifted.

I lost the mandatory reconsideration (which took about 2 months)

because a letter is deemed to have been received 2 days after posting.

 

The council welfare person has sent of for me to go to a tribunal which is next week

and he thinks i'll lose because of case law about receiving letters.

 

I have since spoke to other people who were sanctioned because of not receiving letters

and have had them lifted once they've done a mandatory reconsideration, so why's mine different.

 

 

I think they'll do this all the time now if they can get away with it.

I have to send any letters to the jobcentre recorded because of the amount of times they've said they've not received them

 

In the tribunal form which I have a copy of the jobcentre's response it says about the first sanction/mwa

- that I was late and refused to do any tasks?

 

 

it also says they overlooked the first sanction and now think I should be sanctioned for 6 months (for not receiving a letter!)

 

so now will this last sanction go from 6 months to 3 years? I can't live on £35 a week.

I am finding it really hard now.

I am minus £60 in my gas meter and i'm freezing,

my bed feels damp and smells musty when I get in it,

 

 

I would really love a hot bath (I must stink) and electric seems to be running out quicker

I have about £3 in that (emergency) which is to last till I get paid on Monday

 

Any advice anyone can give would be great, I don't know what to do

Sorry for the long post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I remember your original posts about that 'charity' shop quite well - Disgusted then, and disappointed at the response from the DWP.

 

About all I can suggest at the moment is to send a subject access request to the DWP demanding copies of all records held by them and any/all subcontractors, especially the ones handling the MWA placements. The SAR may well turn up a copy of this mysterious missing letter, but proving that you did not receive it is going to be difficult. Are you aware of any other problems with your post ?

For example, are there any addresses in your area that could be confused ?

 

As an example, in a city close by, we have two roads by the name of Broom Avenue, one in NR6, the other in NR7, a distance of just four miles. Unless the letter has a postcode, it is pot luck as to which house gets the delivery :!:

 

It might be worthwhile contacting Royal Mail and asking if there are any issues that have been highlighted in the postman's "walk log" for your address - You may need to talk to your local delivery office rather than going through the RM help desk.

 

 

P.S. Have you seen this thread: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?436146-Benefit-sanctions-Present-your-case-to-the-Select-Committee - I would urge you to make a submission to the select committee.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You want the postal logs from whoever sent the letter.

 

There's a thread on here Booths was it? But there's also a few threads on rightsnet about it.

 

Most non DWP postal logs log something but not what was sent nor a copy of what was sent - so on balance of probability at a tribunal you should win. Then there's always the off chance *cough* that nothing was sent at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies

 

 

In the response from the jobcentre to the tribunal is a copy of the letter that was sent, but the jobcentre has wrote they do not have the original and enclosed in a copy, which makes me think no letter was ever sent.

 

 

I do live in a apartment with a security door on the front of the building. The regular post man has a fob to get in, but if someone else is on they can't get in unless someone in the building lets him in. I've had post delivered in the past with 'no access' and the date written on them.

The welfare person at the council did fill in a lost letter form online with royal mail for the mandatory reconsideration

 

 

I will make a submission to the select committee, hopefully something will be done about these sanctions there giving everybody

 

 

I'll read the other threads see what info I can find

 

 

Does anyone know what tribunals are like?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am finding it really hard now. I am minus £60 in my gas meter and i'm freezing, my bed feels damp and smells musty when I get in it, I would really love a hot bath (I must stink) and electric seems to be running out quicker I have about £3 in that (emergency) which is to last till I get paid on Monday

 

A damp, musty bed will do your health no good what so ever. You are at risk of some pretty unpleasant respiratory illnesses that could have long term consequences. Do you have any close friends or family in the area that can help ?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the fact the OP is going through this is absolutely disgusting.

what on earth has this country come to ?

 

Quite. Rather like the need for people to use food banks in the year 2014 and deciding whether to keep warm or eat - all basic human rights to be able to eat, have a roof over your head and keep warm. Blame Cameron, IDS, Osbourne and the rest of the unelected disgraceful Tory regime. The FACT is these welfare reforms ARE KILLING PEOPLE

Link to post
Share on other sites

But the sanction for the letter not received has not been lifted. I lost the mandatory reconsideration (which took about 2 months) because a letter is deemed to have been received 2 days after posting.

[...]

I have to send any letters to the jobcentre recorded because of the amount of times they've said they've not received them

 

Just to pick up on one point here. Whilst there is a presumption that a letter posted is deemed to have been delivered after two working days (if posted first class), the same rules should apply when sending letters to the DWP. They can not have it both ways.

 

For the record, Royal Mail do lose or damage letters. It is an inevitable part of the mechanised process used to sort the 14 Billion or so letters annually. There is also scope within the processes used by the DWP for letters to be lost before it even gets to a Royal Mail sorting office.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Emma.

 

Have you got a date for your Tribunal Hearing yet, how much time have you got to prepare for it?

 

Could you describe a bit more about your first sanction, or alternatively post a link to the thread where you have already discussed it?

 

Specifically;

 

Who arranged the placement in that case?

 

Was there doubt about the proper procedure being followed in arranging the placement?

 

Why a 13 week sanction at that time? Was it not your first sanction within a year?

 

Did you appeal against this sanction?

Link to post
Share on other sites

LW: Emma's experience of the first MWA placement starts here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?383804-work-programme-after-2-years&p=4376501#post4376501. The letter detailing this placement is at post #836.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mr P for providing the link

 

 

My tribunal is tomorrow at 11am, wonder what will happen? I don't know how I can be punished because of not receiving a letter. Having to go court over this, it makes no sense.

 

 

I have been reading other threads on here about benefits and I'm horrified at what they can do to people

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link Mr. P, reads like a horrific nightmare from the word go. Looks like the grounds for each of the sanctions are dubious,to say the least.

 

There's a lot to cover and hardly any time to cover it.

 

It would be helpful to know if the Tribunal Hearing is limited to the last sanction or can justification for all of them be addressed?

 

A bit more about what exactly is being appealed would be helpful in determining if the Tribunal is prepared to hear a statement regarding each of the sanctions.

 

A copy of the DWP's arguments to support it's position should have been sent to you, Emma, by the Tribunal. It would be helpful to know what their grounds are for fighting the Appeal, or which of the sanctions do they refer to or mention.

 

A couple of points for clarification on the first sanction:

 

Were any arrangements made for travel expences before the placement was due to start? Was it even mentioned?

 

When you got to the place was the person who verbally accosted you the person you were supposed to report to?

 

Was there an induction, or any mention of one? Was anyone from Learn Direct there when you arrived?

 

You say that you were taken into a back room and it was packed? was that with goods or people?

 

If people, were they all claimants starting MWA, or were there some shop employees there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As LW says, time is short but hopefully you'll get some help before morning. Just concentrate on the facts at the tribunal and don't be tempted to complain about the flaws in the system. Be respectful but remember you have right on your side so hold your head up and don't let anyone intimidate you. You know and we know you have done nothing wrong.

 

Good luck.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I went today for the tribunal and it was just in a room sat at a table across from the judge, no one from DWP was there.

 

 

I've won it!

 

 

I've be given a letter of them which says:

1. The appeal is allowed

2. The decision is set aside

 

 

The tribunal accepts that the appellant did not receive the notice to participate and that is the reason that she did not attend. The tribunal considers that to be a good reason. There should be no sanction therefore based on her failure to attend

 

 

They said they would send the same letter to DWP

 

 

So it is worth fighting them, even though I don't think it should of gone this far in the first place over a letter.

 

 

I don't know what will happen now. I'm waiting to speak to the welfare person at the council, but shouldn't I get the money owed to me back and the sanction I'm on now changed from a 26 week sanction to a 13 week sanction?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations!

 

DWP will now get a copy of the outcome of the tribunal. They will then look at that. They are able to appeal. But this is rare and can only do this on the basis of law. (ie, they can't appeal because they don't like it - same as everyone else)

 

You then will then receive a letter (I can't say how long this will be, what with Christmas and new year) which will explain the DWP's decision, given the above - ie, if they're going to appeal it or not.

 

If DWP don't appeal, you will get your money backdated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that info

 

 

Hopefully they don't decide to appeal and everything goes ok. Suppose Its just a waiting game now, hope its sorted by the end of January I don't want to be waiting for months

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations Emma. Let's hope they cough up as quickly as they impose sanctions!

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations and well done Emma.

 

Yes, this means that the sanction decision is set aside, which basically means it is cancelled because there was no sound argument put in defence of it.

 

In the DWP's submission to the Tribunal they will have set out the their case and the grounds on which they made their decision to sanction. (you should have a copy of that submission).

 

It is hardly likely that the DWP will appeal. The Tribunal could not have thought very much of their submission since they did not appear to regard it as worth mentioning. The Tribunal will also take a dim view of anyone showing their contempt for it by not even bothering to turn up to defend their actions.

 

This means that you will be receiving the 13 weeks benefits that has been withheld. As you say, it couldn't come at a better time.

 

The DWP seem to get away with stopping benefit payment almost before the claimant realises what is happening. They will probably not repay as fast though.

 

The DWP does not close down completely for the full Christmas and New Year holiday weeks, they just stop doing the usual signing on functions. If you do not hear from them by next Monday, using the same 2 day rule for receipt of letters that they clobber us with, you could go and see the local JC manager and insist on answers there and then, or leave a letter insisting on written answers asap.

 

As for the latest sanction. It may be worth considering fighting to have it quashed entirely, never mind having it reduced. If you read the grounds on which they arrived at the decision and on which they are defending their decision it may be possible to find grounds on which to test its veracity and legality. For example, do they use anything to do with the sanction that has now been set aside in their case for applying this current one? Have they followed what you now know as being the proper procedure in applying it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a letter from the jobcentre today about the tribunal

 

 

It says:

 

 

About Your Jobseeker's Allowance Appeal

 

 

I am writing to tell you that we remain unable to pay you any jobseeker's allowance for the period 01/05/14 to 30/07/14. This is because we are applying for a statement of reasons from the Tribunals Service for the decision made on 15/12/14 and may appeal against the first-tier Tribunal's decision.

 

 

You have no right of appeal against this decision, However, if this decision causes you hardship please get in touch with us.

 

 

If your circumstances change it may affect the amount of benefit you get. Please tell us about any changes in your circumstances.

 

 

We will write to tell you what happens next. But if you want more information please get in touch with us. Our address and telephone number are at the top of this letter. An advice centre like Citizens Advice or a local law centre can also give you free advice.

 

 

Yours sincerely

Appeals Officer

 

 

The letter has come from Norwich Post Handling Site not my local jobcentre

Can't believe its still going on. If they had bothered to turn up at the tribunal they would of know the reasons I won the appeal

Wonder how long I'll be waiting now before I hear anything of them

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Nystagmite has pointed out, the DWP can only appeal a tribunal decision on a point of law. You have managed to convince the tribunal that on the balance of probability you did not receive the alleged letter, so there is little (if anything) the DWP can appeal against. It smacks of a delaying tactic with the sole intention to inflict further misery over the holiday period.

 

With many of the key staff taking time off over the next couple of weeks coupled with seasonal postal delays, it is unlikely a final decision will be made until the New Year.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh for goodness sake what is the matter with these people? As Mr P says, these people seem to deliberately want to inflict misery, and I don't just mean in your case Emma. Anyone who has the audacity to stand up for their rights seems to be in their firing line. I guess it's down to the pressure front line staff are under to sanction people, but all these appeals, tribunals etc must cost more than just paying people what they're entitled to!!!!!

 

Rant over and sorry it's not quite over yet Emma.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...