Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lowell/overdale claimform - old Shop Direct CAT debt - Now Wiped out by my Court Charges Reclaim **WON**


Ftgab19
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2517 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Old cogger

 

Could you tell me what points can go or which one's to make shorter? I'm not sure what else I could take out that's not needed.

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 358
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Change 5. to rolling credit not unsecured.

 

Remove from 17. MCOB (Section 12.5). again thats for Mortgages.

 

34 A&B merge them into one line and remove declaration

 

Think again about E...if you defaulted then the claimant is entitled to mark your file accordingly

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

I've added the changes and I think I've finished the Exhibits.

 

I'll upload it for you to look at and If its okay I'll email tonight. Or do I have until the 27/06/2017 to email it?

 

Thanks

Andrew

images(4).pdf

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must submit it by the dates stated within your Notice of Allocation (Courts Directions) before the hearing date.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

My court papers say two weeks before the hearing date the 11/07/2017. So that's the 27/06/2017 I think.

 

Is the witness statement okay or do I need to change anything?

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks good to me...its for them now to justify why the charges are justified :-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

That's great thank god lol.

 

It felt a lot longer then it took. I'll get it emailed off tomorrow since I've got until then.

 

Thanks for all your help I hope they settle :)

 

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update

 

I rang up the court yesterday and they said the defendant witness statement was sent in on the 28/06/2017 and was on the system on the 28/06/2017. I'm not sure how it got on in one day but the deadline was the 27/06/2017 so does that mean they've not complied with the courts orders?

 

Also I've still not got a copy of the witness statement or heard anything from them and the hearing is only 4 days away. Should I send them a letter asking for a copy of the witness statement?

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell the court they failed to serve it on you...and therefore they have not complied with the court directions...whether you ask the court for a copy is your decision...but you can enter trial and state the fact and that their WS should be dismissed as you have not been served or had time to consider.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

I thought that meant they hadn't complied with the orders. Would the defendant be able to stop the witness statement being dismissed? I can't see how they could because surly it be an unfair trial if it could go ahead with them knowing my statement but me not knowing theirs.

 

Also what do I do if it turns up like the day before the trial?

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

directions clearly state 14 days pre trial....dont let them ambush you...the court should impose sanctions.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay Andy thanks

 

I'll let the court know that they have clearly not complied and probably had no intention of complying. Also what are sanctions in court? Would that mean there defence is struck-out and I win by default?

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct...also if they have failed to disclose any evidence on you (documents) then they can only proceed on verbal evidence...no written.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy

 

So what would I need to say when I go into the court room to have the defendants witness statement and defence struck out? Do I have to say it a certain way or can I keep it simple?

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simple in your own words...you can refer to CPR 3.... In civil litigation, the court’s general case management powers are set out at Part 3 of

the CPR.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy

I've been looking at part 3 of the CPR and found Power to strike out a statement of case part 3.4. Am I right in thinking I can use paragraph (2)c "that there has been a failure to comply with a rule, practice direction or court order." in my statement to the court to get the defendants witness statement and defence struck out?

 Thanks

Andrew

Also would I refer to there witness statement as an "Affidavit" when I request that the judge strike it out?

Thanks

Andrew

I'm not sure if I've understood the CPR right but would the following make sense and be okay to be the first thing I say to the judge?

Sir, I would like to draw your attention to the Defendant’s lack of compliance with the orders set out in the “Notice of Allocation to the Small Claims Track”. In this notice, it was ordered that the Defendant has to deliver to the Claimant copies of all documents on which the Defendant intended to rely upon no later than 14 days before the hearing.

The Defendant to this date has not delivered any witness statements or case evidence to myself the claimant. In light of this failure to comply with the orders set out by the court I request that the judge refers to part 3.4© of the CPR and strike-out the Defendant’s Witness statement and Counterclaim.

Thanks

Andrew

Bump

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perfect :thumb:

 

Have they made a counter claim?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

Thanks for your reply and no there wasn't any counter claim. I thought their defence was classed as a counter claim but after looking up it's not my bad lol.

Would you by any chance have an idea what would most like be said to me or happen after I give my statement? I just want to be ready encase they say something I don't understand.

Also what documents do I need to bring to the court. I'm guessing the witness statement and all correspondence?

Thanks

Andrew

Also Andy

Am I right in this calculation of how much I'm owed?

408.00 in fees

504.56 Interest in restitution

166.25 in 8% Simple Interest

80.00 court fee

Total £1,158.81

Is there any court costs I should be adding or is it all good?

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take all your file.....paginate it so easily accessible .....top page should be your bullet points that your claim relies upon.

 

Figures look okay...but you have all the workings so I assume you have checked them...you have already added your court fee..no further costs.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

I'll take everything with me then.

What do I have to do when I've made my statement to the judge?

Also will I have to make another statement for the judgement after the judge has said his bit or will the judge do that after he strikes out the defendants witness statement?

Thanks

Andrew

Just done a bit more research into what happens.

What should my closing statement be.

Can it be like the opening statement?

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure were you are researching Andrew but there wont be any opening or closing statements..its not Crown Court...let the DJ lead the hearing...you will be asked by the DJ to speak at the relevant times as Claimant.

 

But your initial statement should concentrate on the defendants lack of compliance and you ask the court to consider what we have discussed above and also that the defendant is barred from introducing written documentary evidence and if allowed to proceed only rely on verbal evidence only.....then let the Judge direct.

 

You will be lucky if he allows more than 45mins.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

Sorry I've been trying all morning to get an idea of what would happen in the room and I keep getting different views when looking. I'm gunna set off for the court soon will this be okay for me to say when asked.

 

 

1. Sir, I would like to draw your attention to the Defendant’s lack of compliance with the orders set out in the “Notice of Allocation to the small claims Track”.

 

2. In this notice, it was ordered that the Defendant has to deliver to the Claimant copies of all documents on which the Defendant intended to rely upon no later than 14 days before the hearing.

 

3. The Defendant to this date has not delivered any witness statements or case evidence to myself the claimant.

 

4. In light of this failure to comply with the orders set out by the court. I request that you refer to part 3.4© of the Civil Procedure Rules and strike-out the Defendant’s Witness statement.

 

5. I also think that you should apply sanctions to the defendant for this failure to comply with the orders and that the defendant is barred from introducing written documentary evidence.

 

6. If the defendant is allowed to proceed with the case after these sanctions I request that the defendant only rely on verbal evidence.

 

 

Also If the judge does strike out their witness statement. Will he still want to hear my witness statement or will he just apply judgement since the defendant no longer will have a defence?

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes thats fine.....he wont strike out their witness statement as they have not submitted one...you mean their defence?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They haven't sent a copy to me but they filed one with the court on the 28/06/2017 a day after the dead line. So I thought it would have to of also been struck out. Does that mean I should ask to strike out there defence not witness statement?

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both :-)

 

Its important to understand that any party cannot be ambushed with evidence without due time allowed to consider it..thats the basic mechanics of law and trial...file and serve...if you get this point across effectively...and succinctly then you shouldnt need to worry about anything further as they will either strike out or adjourn to allow you to consider their statement.

 

Do not allow the Judge to allow the defendant to ambush you!!!

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...