Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How do I 'link' a letter without posting it publicly. Sorry for stupid question.
    • Rather than dsunaks lies, lets look at the reaL Data and real black holes in the UKs budget - all created by the poop Tories   Public sector finances, UK: April 2024   Main points Borrowing – the difference between public sector spending and income – was (a black hole of) £20.5 billion in JUST April 2024, the fourth highest April borrowing since monthly records began in 1993. Borrowing in April 2024 was £1.5 billion more than in April 2023 and £1.2 billion more than the £19.3 billion forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). Public sector receipts grew by £1.6 billion compared with April 2023, however, this growth was outstripped by a £3.1 billion increase in spending over the same period. Since our March 2024 publication, we have increased our initial estimate of borrowing in the financial year ending March 2024 by £0.8 billion to £121.4 billion, now £7.3 billion more than the £114.1 billion forecast by the OBR. Public sector net debt excluding public sector banks (debt) at the end of April 2024 was provisionally estimated at 97.9% of gross domestic product (GDP); this was 2.5 percentage points more than at the end of April 2023, and remains at levels last seen in the early 1960s. Excluding the Bank of England, debt was 89.9% of GDP, 8.0 percentage points lower than the wider debt measure. Public sector net worth excluding public sector banks was in deficit by £703.4 billion at the end of April 2024, a £93.5 billion larger deficit than at the end of April 2023.     and the Tory legacy of financial mismanagement  to be passed on :   UK government debt 2023 | Statista WWW.STATISTA.COM Government debt in the United Kingdom reached over 2.25 trillion British pounds in 2022/23, compared with 1.83 trillion pounds in...  
    • yep. if they send no paperwork by the time mediation comes to be able to make an informed decision upon mediation..you refuse it. keep reading up here dx  
    • uncle, why you think the last 2 years I did not not do this lol - 90% was keeping my partner sane... but after explaining everything and that we have a plan she is feeling a lot better about it.
    • That's very interesting to hear! I received a notification of a CC verification from Coles in Australia on the 12th May - also a Sunday evening. Not having been to Oz for about 30 years I was somewhat suspicious and so immediately cancelled the card. Guess what, it's the one I use to pay Lyca with........... If you've got any further information I'd be interested in hearing it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claimform lowells/BW - old 3 mobile 'debt'


geee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3407 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've been issued with court papers from an old debt from Three/lowells/BW Legal

Is there a secure/private part of the forum I can ask questions and get help with writing my defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

this is the forum , you have found it

 

 

please fill out the following

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-April-2014**

 

 

and post it back here

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that..

I'll fill in the details tomorrow but I'm afraid I've left it a little late posting on here! Claim form was dated the 9th Sept I think but will confirm tomorrow.

I've done my AOS.

 

Will BW not see what's going on here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so what hundreds of like threads here

 

 

its no hiding game anymore

 

 

have you send CPR?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if its was the 9th sept you've a good few days yet to submit

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you complete dx,s link in post 2 and tell us the details we will then be able to advise on how to proceed.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd

 

Date of issue 9th September 2014

 

What is the claim for?

The claimant's is for the sum of £563.46 being monies due from the Defendant to the claimantunder a non regulated communications agreement between the defendant and Three mobile

Under account ref ****** and assigned to the claimant ao 09/03/2011 notice of which has been given to the defendant.

the defendant failed to maintain the contractual payment under the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served and not complied with.

the claim also includes statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8.00% per anum (a daily rate of 0.11 from the date of assignment of the agreement to the date of issue being an amount of £128.00.

 

What is the value of the claim? £563.46 (ammount claimed)

 

Is the claim for a current or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? mobile phone.

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007?[/color][/color] I think I started with Three in 2005 but canceled the contract Nov 2006..

I cancelled my contract as I was emigrating to Spain and this was the end of my contract.

The next day they phoned me and offered me a pay as you go deal that in brief I was told it was pay as you go with £400+ credit etc (my monthly bills were £150-£200 a month so thought they just wanted to keep me till I emigrated in Jan 2007), so used till I moved to Spain then paid the £4 balance that I had gone over and that was March 2007.

They have been trying to get me to pay for a full years contract since saying it was a contract I took when I believe it wasn't! Why wouldn't I of taken a nice new handset???

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I need to find the file as it's thick as this has been going on for years! (will update this)

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes for £97!

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Not sure, I need to find the file as it's thick as this has been going on for years! (will update this)

 

Why did you cease payments:- March 2007 was the last payment I made but I did a SAR to which they replied that they had used this money to pay off part of the balance! (letter to prove)

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? I claim I was missold the contract as I cancelled my contract Nov 06 as I was emigrating to Spain and this was the end of my contract.

The next day they phoned me and offered me a pay as you go deal that in brief I was told it was pay as you go with £400+ credit etc (my monthly bills were £150-£200 a month so thought they just wanted to keep me till I emigrated in Jan 2007), so used till I moved to Spain then paid the £4 balance that I had gone over and that was March 2007.

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan? NO

 

What you need to do now.

 

Answer the questions above

 

If you have not already done so – send a CCA1974 request to the claimant. where do I find this?

 

Send a CPR31.14 request to the solicitor named on the claim form for copies of documents mentioned/implied within the claim form. There are two different versions - one for Loans/Credit cards the other for Current accounts. where do I find this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was originally defaulted by Three for £97 - 09/12/07

But Lowells and Red have been pursuing me for £435.46

 

I think this is Statured bared but have some info I don't want to be seen public!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay geee many thanks......

 

Section 77/78 (CCA request) is not applicable to mobile phone contracts so disregard.PM me the details re SB if you wish to keep it off forum.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay so wrote to the claimant in 2011 and made a F&FS offer without prejudice ...they made a response offering a payment plan.

 

What date was the last payment to the account?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally think your offer could not be construed as an acknowledgement...was made WP...last payment March 2007.....I would therefore submit the statute barred defence.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally think your offer could not be construed as an acknowledgement...was made WP...last payment March 2007.....I would therefore submit the statute barred defence.

 

Regards

 

Andy

Can I defend on two counts? SB & miss sold? Do I also bring it to the courts attention the fact they used my SAR fee to pay some of the balance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not recommended to mix the two types of defence......as it tends to dilute its effect.A SB defence is the ultimate defence and does not require any additions to defeat a claim.

 

You need to decide which way to defend..one or the other.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy

 

So I stand a better chance of going SB as I've not paid since march 07? Not sure on how to write my defence up but do I add that they paid £10.00 off the balance from using my SAR fee?

Do I supply the letter they sent saying they'd paid it from my SAR fee?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you dont add anything....

 

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on ( insert date).

 

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980. If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.

 

3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £x or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tnanks Andy

 

So that above is what I put as my defence and that's it? Thats all required as its Statute Barred

Nothing about them paying with my SAR fee? No if the debts dismissed are you really concerned about £10?

Will I need to attend court? Depends if they proceed if so yes If so do I counter claim?

For what ? £10?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you tell them it was for a DSAR...not payment towards the account.:bolt:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence submitted as below... Thanks Andy

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on 9th September 2014

 

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a

claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions

of section 5 of the limitation acticon 1980. If, which is denied,

the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the

alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date

on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of

the Claimant.

 

3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £693.46 or any

other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have 28 days to respond...if they fail the claim is stayed if they reply and tell the court they wish to proceed.....then the claim is allocated to your local county court.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...