Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
    • No doubt the hotel will have security cameras on the floor you were staying to confirm or deny the allegation??   The only compensation you will probably get, which will be discretionary as a goodwill gesture, will be a credit voucher for the entire hotel group. Very much doubt anything more than that as you have not substantiated, the hotel committed the transgression 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

out of my depth with SD over school fees


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3691 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The Defence has to come after the set aside, but I am wondering if there is anything to be done about the fact that they terminated the arrangement for you to pay by monthly DD without any notice, and in fact refused to take the monthly payment you offered.

 

Did you ever get a letter or email from them confirming that they were happy to accept monthly payments and the fees would be paid on that basis?

 

I have 8 years worth of invoices from them with the following wording "Please note you are paying by monthly direct debit. Collections will be made on the 15th of each month"

Also the varies emails, stating DD had missed or that they would take 2 payments together the next direct debit date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have 8 years worth of invoices from them with the following wording "Please note you are paying by monthly direct debit. Collections will be made on the 15th of each month"

Also the varies emails, stating DD had missed or that they would take 2 payments together the next direct debit date.

 

Again, I don't think it is reasonable for them to withdraw the agreement without notice (although there may be something in the T&Cs).

 

Let's see what Andy thinks when he comes back later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tomorrow!

 

I'm sorry I thought we had more time.

 

I'm sure Andy will be along shortly with his thoughts, but I think you should ask for the set aside on the basis of your husband's illness, and yours. The delay in asking for the set aside will have to be due to continuing ill health.

 

Andy will advise you on what to say for the Defence based on the information you have just given.

 

Do you have any emails where you have offered to pay by instalments, and they have replied refusing to allow you to do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tomorrow!

 

I'm sorry I thought we had more time.

 

I'm sure Andy will be along shortly with his thoughts, but I think you should ask for the set aside on the basis of your husband's illness, and yours. The delay in asking for the set aside will have to be due to continuing ill health.

 

Andy will advise you on what to say for the Defence based on the information you have just given.

 

Do you have any emails where you have offered to pay by instalments, and they have replied refusing to allow you to do this?

 

unfortunately the dismissal of paying the bill in 2 instalments, i.e. the first at the time of the exclusion and the second before end of term, were executed over the telephone. Only have emails, referring to one missed payment then the next email, states they want triple the amount. They don't even state that they wanted the term paid in full, just an amount, it is our assumption that it is the term in full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you reply to those emails saying it would be impossible for you to do this?

 

Is the amount right for the full term's fees?

 

There is also the matter of the other amounts for outings, etc.

 

Were the DDs for 12 payments over the year? When did the year start? September?

 

I did communicate over the phone with the credit controller that we could not make the full payment, and asked for it to be split into 2 payments, I was told that they were not a bank!.

The school operates a termly policy, they send an invoice for 3 months, you pay by DD or in full at the beginning of a term. We had always used the DD method, thus our termly payments were split into 3 equal sums.

Our child was excluded because we owed half of the terms fee, with 2 months left to run on the term.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be dodging about but we are dealing with a set aside and a defence.

 

Can you list the exact charges you think you should have paid - 3 x ?£

 

Then the rest of the charges they are claiming.

 

Then the amount on the claim itself. Total, court fees, other charges. Solicitor's fees?

 

Then the disputed amounts.

 

Also, you said the bill has gone up by £3,000. What is this £3,000 for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be dodging about but we are dealing with a set aside and a defence.

 

Can you list the exact charges you think you should have paid - 3 x ?£

 

Then the rest of the charges they are claiming.

 

Then the amount on the claim itself. Total, court fees, other charges. Solicitor's fees?

 

Then the disputed amounts.

 

Also, you said the bill has gone up by £3,000. What is this £3,000 for?

 

the extra costs = £3000 are solicitor fees, court fees ect as of the SD

 

I think we should have paid £3,238, that covers the time at school. this includes 2 full months and 2 weeks. They only excluded our child because we couldn't pay the full term.

the extra charges are pupil insurances over the exclusion period. = £70

Dance lessons over the exclusion period.= £212

and late payment charges of £=91

plus school trip of £30

the total amount for the ccm claim itself = £5910.08

as of the SD it is almost £9000

Link to post
Share on other sites

See post #44

 

Thanks Andy,

 

So I'm trying to base my defence around,

 

Ill health, mine initially, making it difficult for my husband to work full time as a contractor, thus finances were tighter.

The unfair exclusion of our child, as willing to pay monies owed to that point, but school refused.

The lack of clarity and response to requests made by us over the billing.

communication from the solicitor notifying the a claim against us

following day notice from the court ref claim

husbands ill health in refuting why we could not deal with this until now.

 

in your opinion.... is this enough ... or too much?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also (sorry if you have already mentioned this earlier) can you afford to offer them anything in monthly payments at the moment?

 

yes we can pay half of the amount of the judgment, and willing to make arrangements to clear the rest within a year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£3,000 solicitors costs! I think you could challenge those.

 

The court costs for the CCJ in a small claims court shouldn't be more than £95, less if they did it online. They didn't pay anything further because you didn't defend.

 

I think it's £80 to issue a Statutory Demand, although I'm not 100% on that.

 

I don't think you will have much of a chance challenging the extras apart from the school trip if this was arranged some time after they had excluded her. The insurance will have been paid and presumably it's in the t&cs that extras like dance classes have to be paid up front. There is probably also something about late payment charges.

 

I think Andy needs to know more in detail about the actual letter they sent

 

Can you type it up here.

 

Did you respond in writing repeating your offer of payment by instalments?

 

I will be out now for a couple of hours but will be back later. What time is the hearing tomorrow?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I had a very similar situation at well known school on the south coast. They tried to put a charging order on my house, things were difficult after my wife nearly died. The headmaster was known as a self appointed expert on every thing. To cut a long story short I looked at via the charity commission the schools charity status to no avail at time. However in the meantime there has been talk among some MPs and others about removing their charitable status generally. You are allowed to ask for a copy of their charter from the commissioner and question their charitable status. It is quite clear that have not acted as charitable organisation given that your family is in distress. With some backing from press this might big stick to beat them with. Being a charity they save thousands in VAT. This means in effect they are supported by the tax payer.

I hope this is some help, I know first hand how difficult this is, Good luck

Pavi

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi macm00n,

 

I don't know if Andy will be back online before you go to Court.

 

I think your application for a set aside should be based on your husband having his stroke during the 14 day period when you could have acknowledged the Claim, and your and his on-going health problems which is why you have not applied for a set aside earlier. You obviously have the statement from the consultant.

 

I think you should say that it was always your intention to challenge part of the claim because you have never been given a clear figure. Point out that they have given five different figures so far. This is important. If you don't say you intended to defend part of the claim there is no reason for the judgment to be set aside.

 

Also say you want to challenge the amount added for their solicitor's fees and court costs.

 

Take the bank statements and statements from the school that show you were paying direct debits by agreement. Point out that they stopped this agreement without any prior notice and would not accept your payment, but demanded the whole sum and because you could not pay immediately they suspended your daughter who is only ? 7 years old.

 

Say that you offered to pay by instalments and the credit controller said they were "not a bank". Say it has always been your intention to pay the actual outstanding fees but you were not in a position to pay the entire sum when they demanded it and they have repeatedly refused an instalment plan.

 

That is the best I can do for now. The main thing is that you did offer to pay and you disagree with the sum they have claimed which is why you always intended to defend the claim.

 

I hope that helps a bit and I'll be thinking of you tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck for today - please let us know how things go !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy,

 

So I'm trying to base my defence around,

 

Ill health, mine initially, making it difficult for my husband to work full time as a contractor, thus finances were tighter.

The unfair exclusion of our child, as willing to pay monies owed to that point, but school refused.

The lack of clarity and response to requests made by us over the billing.

communication from the solicitor notifying the a claim against us

following day notice from the court ref claim

husbands ill health in refuting why we could not deal with this until now.

 

in your opinion.... is this enough ... or too much?

 

If you was not allowed 7/14 days to propose any intentions then Pre Action Protocol was not complied with by the Solicitor.

It was your intention to fully defend the claim not partial except for the un for seen medical emergency that took priority at the time.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you was not allowed 7/14 days to propose any intentions then Pre Action Protocol was not complied with by the Solicitor.

It was your intention to fully defend the claim not partial except for the un for seen medical emergency that took priority at the time.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Thank you all so much for your time, knowledge and patience.

 

Here we go!!

 

I will of course let you know the outcome.

 

Fingers crossed.

Xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

evening all

 

so a quick update

 

We lost.

 

The judge whilst sympathetic with the illness in our family, has rule the debt was owed, that we entered into a contract with the school, we breached that agreement, therefore the debt was due. He did reduce the solicitors costs by £300 tho.

 

The judge did inform us of our options at this point,

1) pay the debt in full

2) apply through the court to vary how we pay, i.e. submit an attachment of earnings etc and the court will award instalment amounts.

 

the claimants solicitor also spoke to us after .. advising to have the SD set aside, cancelled, as unless by a miraculous technicality it would stand and they would award bankruptcy.

 

could that miraculous technicality be that he forgot to date the SD???

 

anyway the solicitor also said he would confer with his clients as to instalment payments, but they would only be open to that if we submit to them an attachment of earnings.

 

so may I once more ask for any thoughts on which way might be more beneficial to us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't listen to that weasel solicitor, your creditor has been awarded a CCJ - for now park all the noise that the weasel is making about the SD its just a lot of hot air. The Judge has reduced their costs and summarised your options. Very simply pay in full or apply to the court to pay in installments. This is called a redetermination, others on this forum much better versed in the fine detail will advise you how to apply for a redetermination, its a form you fill in and submit.

You will need to complete an income and expenditure form, listing out your legitimate living expenses and your income. The courts don't expect you to live on pot noodles but they'd be rather put out if you were buying cigarettes and vintage port. This information is shared with your creditor. The redetermination is conducted in the judges chambers and HE makes a decision on how much you will pay each month. It is an informal session and te Judge recognises the fact that you are not a lawyer. He enters this information on the CCJ it is his order. Your creditor will probably ask for the debt to be secured on your property, the Judge will consider such a request along with any objections you put. I would also ask the Judge to consider setting aside the SD. If they get the charging order then the debt is like a mortgage and this will be reflected at the Land Registry.

To enforce a CCJ in the event of a debtor not making the payments ordered by a judge, creditors have to follow a legal process, firing out a SD is not along the timeline.

As long as you make the payments as directed by the Judge that's it, the SD is irrelevant

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will alert others on the site team - I think you probably will need to cancel the set aside application.

 

I believe you would be best served by applying to the court for a redermination of the judgment debt. It might be a good idea if you were to speak to National Debtline and have them help you prepare a common financial statement - although the one I have attached is acceptable in courts. The reason I suggest ND is that they will let you know immediately if your expenditure is going to raise any eyebrows with the court.

 

https://www.nationaldebtline.org/EW/Pages/default.aspx

 

Call us free on

 

0808 808 4000

 

Monday to Friday 9am to 9pm

 

Saturday 9.30am to 1pm

 

 

 

Ellens Budget Sheet.xls

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mac, please see correction on my advice by andyorch below. It appears you have to make application to vary the judgement by using form N245 and the court has it's own I&E.

 

My apologies.

 

You dont redetermine a forthwith CB you apply to vary N245 which already has it own court standard I&E.They wont accept any other.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...