Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
    • New rules and higher rates resulted in a jump in the number of savers opening accounts at the start of this year's Isa season.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Management company asking for more and more money


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3646 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Caggers,

I have a query on my friend's behalf.

He pays service charges related to communal areas around his freehold house to a management company.

Recently they have increased the charges by almost 50% without explanation

and asked for £500 arrears because they made a mistake not charging an administration fee for the past 6 years.

At this point my friend requested evidence of expenditures.

They refused to provide them, claiming that the accounts are private (?!?!)

They also ignored my friend's request to view the building insurance certificate which costs around £70/year.

He showed me a breakdown of the charges they claimed in the past 6 years

and I can tell that there is something fishy,

i.e. there's a charge for garden maintenance

and one for landscaping,

one charge named Management charge and

one Administration fee (the one they forgot to charge and they want £500 now).

It sounds like the same things under a different name to me.

He now wants to inspect all accounts for the past 6 years including all supporting evidence to balance the sheets

but they are refusing to disclose these and said that he's only entitled to the breakdown of charges,

a list with the price next to each line.

What can it be done to obtain the accounts?

I thought of a SAR, but would the DPA apply to this kind of situation?

Second question:

the Administration fee they forgot to charge is a contractual fee stated in the lease,

so he needs to pay that, but he can't atm.

What can he do to pay it in small instalments, possibly £5/week?

 

Thanks for your help and let me know if you need any more info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a little confused (not unusual). You say his house is freehold but he has a lease. What is the lease for?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Charges have to be claimed within 18 months so they shouldn't be able to go back 6 years, unless something in the lease says different. http://www.lease-advice.org/documents/Service_Charges.pdf

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a little confused (not unusual). You say his house is freehold but he has a lease. What is the lease for?

Yes, it's odd.

His house is freehold, but there are communal private gardens and parking spaces

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi king

 

They really need to have a good read of the lease for that communal area to fully understand its meaning.

 

In the mean time I would challenge this "Administration FEE" for the past 6yrs.

 

1. As this error was of the Management Companies doing what Act of parliament/Regulation/Legislation states they can claim 6yrs backdated money with copies of these provided to you?

2. A complete breakdown of said money.

3. A full explanation as to why this error was not picked up during those 6yrs by your companies Financial Accountants that would have had to do annual accounts for your company?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks stu007,

I try to answer your questions in order:

 

1. They said that because the admin fee is listed in the lease (It's there, I checked) then it's a contractual fee and must be paid even if it is their error that it was never invoiced.

I suppose they are appealing to the fact that debts become statute barred after 6 years (correct me if I'm wrong) and being a contractual fee it would surely be awarded in the county court.

2. We asked for detailed breakdown of all the other charges which are not listed in the lease, so non contractual, but they refused to give them because the accounts are private (?!?!)

We wrote to them highlighting that if that was the case they could charge £1000 a month for service charges without anyone being able to challenge them.

No answer to this.

On that note, if we make a SAR under the DPA, would they be obliged to disclose full accounts including receipts and proof of expenditures?

3. Already asked, they said human error.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

Normally in similar situations, the property is leasehold and you pay service charges, for leasehold properties there are all sorts of laws that apply and even charges can be challanged at a LVT (Leasehold Valuation Tribunal), now called FTT.

 

BUT unfortuntaley these DO NOT apply to freehold properties, so the links above such as #3 don't apply.

 

In your situation, the leasehold rules dont apply, for example, if leasehold you have rights to view invoices, etc. In your situation it is purely contractually..i.e what ever is in the lease, what does it say ?, does it give an amount ?, can it rise ?, or soes it say something like to pay for services ?

 

If the last one then clearly they can only bill you for costs they have actually incurred, if they started legal action, they would have to prove this, you maybe be able to ask to see details as part of the CPR Pre-Action Protocols.

 

I normally deal with leasehold issues and there are many protections in law, alas freehold properties that include a management fee can be tricky as nearly all of the protection is stripped away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys,

One thing is not clear to me:

If we make a sar to see the detailed accounts under dpa, do they have to comply?

How can they charge what they want without proving that they've actually spent the money?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What does your lease say ?. That is your contract and is the first place to start, can you post it up or the relevant parts with perosnal info redacted.

 

Thanks.

 

I dont know if SAR applies, hopefully someone esle can answer, IF it were leasehold, there are clear provisions under Landlord Tenant Act S21 to view accounts and then further under S22 to actually visit their office and physically inspect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, how are you getting on with this, i believe youre talking about a deed of covenant. Have similar situation and made a lot of paperwork, so get in touch through here and lets see what we can do

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still waiting for my friend to find the lease agreement.

The first question remains: can we request the management company to disclose the details of how the money is spent? (i.e. receipt from the gardening contractor).

The truth is that they do not look after anything deemed communal.

They don't cut the grass, they don't repair car park potholes etc.

The residents have been doing it themselves since the houses were built, so I suppose they're just pocketing the money.

This would explain why they don't want to show any receipt or accounts.

I'll be grateful if anyone could answer the question.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first question, yes you can ask for a full breakdown of their charges, it most likely states that inthe deed. Ie, up front estimate for six months followed by a full and detailed bill six months later.

Although the deed will say your friend promises to pay the company, they also have to provide the service.

So you need the breakdown to allow your friend to make a reasoned judgement over whether the charges are correct.

However, they will most likely refuse this as they will know it will cause them embarrassment. If youve got proof that residents have been doing work on the estate, get them on your side, before any threat of court.

Challenge everything, even down to insurance costs. Lets say this company charges £10 per household, per year for insurance. How many proprties do they manage? If its say 400, then i would expect to see the original insurance policy cost as £4000. If its less, then they have made a profit, which they are not allowed to do.

This formula should work for everything.

Get the bill and the deed together and write down each part, then request the info. If they resist, then that would be fishy to say the least. If it gets to court, then you have certain procedures that allow you to force them to disclose this, as long as the court allows it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far they have refused to provide any evidence and separately my friend asked for the building insurance policy documents (they charge £70 a year to 1400 dwellings) but they ignored his request.

I think that they don't have a building insurance as all houses are freehold and the only parts they're supposed to manage are the flower beds and car park spaces.

Would be nice if hmrc investigated the accounts and found no evidence of any expenditures.

All residents have been looking after the flower beds from day one and the car parks are areas of badly broken tarmac without lines or lights, just empty spaces where residents park.

Indeed fishy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Precisely my point, so that insurance policy should equal 70 x 1400. If it exists, ill wager it doesnt even have the correct value, well worth pursuing. Sounds like exactly same as our company, ive not paid them for over 5 years, so just waiting court, theyve threatened but backed down in the past, they seem to be a little bolder now, but we,ll see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure how a SAR would help you. It is a "Subject Access Request" and only information directly relating to you should be given out.

 

A Freedom of Information request is more like what you are thinking about but I believe (although I may be wrong) that this applies to regulatory (Government owned) bodies only

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, FIR only applies to government bodies.

SAR is probably the best bet, but they've already said that they will only release a summary of how money is spent without evidence of any sort.

In practice they will break up the amount pay in fictitious charges for work never carried out

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget sar , are they threatening court? You can ask that they fully explain all charges, if they refuse then put the account in dispute, if this is a deed of covenant, it will be stated somewhere that they must act reasonably and in the best interests of customers, it may be implied also. So effectively you give them the chance to be unreasonable and they have breached the agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget sar , are they threatening court? You can ask that they fully explain all charges, if they refuse then put the account in dispute, if this is a deed of covenant, it will be stated somewhere that they must act reasonably and in the best interests of customers, it may be implied also. So effectively you give them the chance to be unreasonable and they have breached the agreement.

No, they're not threatening court because my friend has always paid and keeps on paying.

They're just refusing to justify how the money is spent.

They sent him an email saying that they're only obliged to provide a summary of accounts, not proofs that they've actually spent the money.

In other words they take the money from 1400 residents and issue a fabricated summary at a cost of a few pounds a year.

I'm thinking of starting a management company myself!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh wow, thats exactly thevsame response i got a few years ago,

Sounds like the same company to me.

Well, i guess if your friend is paying they wont do a thing, but they have to prove they did the work and they have to prove their costs as there is a maximum 15% normally as profit, our paperwork stated 10 % but the snidey gits charged 15 straight away, so was very misleading.

 

I got trading standards involved, they will investigate on your behalf, the more people who do this it will highlight the issues with this type of company.

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...