Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Schipoo and thank you for the update.   Excellent news for you and a huge relief, I imagine. You might like to start a new thread about Independent Tax if you want advice on that problem. HB
    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
    • President Ruto says Kenyans pay less tax than citizens in some other African countries.View the full article
    • As PM Sunak really showed his true colours at the D Day Commemorations by doing what? Oh I am the British PM lets just leave early I have better things to do and as he is called out on disrespecting all those veterans that served our country for the freedoms we have today he gives a groveling apology to little to late. He knew about this event for a long time and also knew that this is probably the last D Day Commemoration due to the age of those Veterans who gave so much for there countries freedom. Even on the day of the D Day Commemoration he still could have changed his plans As PM and stayed but choose not to showing such DISRESPECT to those Veterans, those that lost there lives and Families for the Freedoms we have today Being a Veteran myself I have never known a PM to show such disrespect what the hell was he thinking SHAME ON YOU PM SUNAK  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Worried - DWP Invitation to office interview - ** RESOLVED **


maggieomx
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3707 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

JUST ANOTHER THING ITS NOT BEING HELD AT MY LOCAL OFFICE ? its being held at one further away , I live in Manchester this is being held in Cheshire east ?about 10 miles away ?? why is it not at my local office ??

 

It'll be at the office where the guy works. Not every office has its own Compliance team. As Jasta11 says, make sure you claim travel expenses - if you can't use public transport and will need a taxi, be sure to confirm this with them in advance.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Maggie, these officers investigate two things - the first is random checks on claims to check for error. What happens here is that a national insurance number is chosen at random by a computer and the officer checks to see if there were errors in processing the claim - basically checking that the person who put the claim on to the computer made no errors - so checking on the processors' error rates. The second is to check on allegations of fraud that they think have no genuine basis - just to give the claim a quick look and tick that they've checked it and (as they thought) no fraud there - they have to check all allegations.

 

 

If they genuinely thought you were committing fraud, they would hold the interview under caution, but basically because they are well aware that some people try to make life difficult for benefit claimants by making allegations that aren't true, they handle it this way.

 

 

So it could be either thing, and if you've done nothing wrong then there truly is nothing to worry about. If I were called in for one of these checks, I wouldn't worry at all.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Panicking so much my dr has upped my valium to 2 x 5mg a day !!,

 

 

feel a little better now at

least the shakes have stopped thankyou xx

Edited by maggieomx
spelling !!
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's just human nature to worry - when a workmate comes up to you and says 'Hey, the Managing Director wants to see you' we always assume something is wrong.

 

Last time I had that happen, all he wanted to do was to thank me for helping a new guy settle in to the job quickly. (I'd rather he'd kept the thanks and stuck an extra £50 in my pay packet but you can't have it all can you!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before my compliance interview I went through the customer compliance guidance / freedom of information request response I found online. It says they are not allowed to tell you what it is about before the interview because it may prejudice the investigation. They have to say "it is to ensure that you are getting the correct payment".

 

Correct payment: payment continues if you done nothing wrong. Incorrect payment: when they pay those who commit fraud. So they check to see if all is in order to ensure claimants only get their rightful money.

 

There are loads of malicious allegations and JCP can tell when it is probably not true as no evidence is provided by the person who makes the report and in these cases they do a compliance interview rather than interview under caution.

 

They have a duty to investigate so they have to check unless the allegation is something absolutely impossible. Like a wheelchair bound 60 year old lady works in a pole dance club on the pole. That they would not look into.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i rang this morning and hes not in thursaday or Friday ! typical and she cant get into his computer to see what its about ,

kk3582 if that's his title that means in being called in for fraud ? his title is fraud and error service compliance officer , if it was only a routine interview why is it not done by a compliance officer, but by a fraud and error officer ? I shakeing with fear and worry

 

Why are you worrying if you haven't done anything wrong, show them all documents they've asked for, I got call a while back and showed them everything bank statements the lot and never heard from them since. You are stressing yourself for no reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the reason im flappin so much is recently I read if someone is suspected of fraud even if it is unfounded they will stop your DLA and try and get you tested to go on PIPS ,and the people who are tested this way normally lose out and ended loseing their DLA and PIPS as their not disabled enough ,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not worry, they have more than likely received an allegation, they have to investigate all allegations they receive even if someone is just trying to cause trouble, if its not under caution it basically means that they don't have much....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maggie, this compliance interview is on the administrative side of the claim, not the disability side. There is disability compliance checks - it used to be called (if I remember rightly) the 'right payment programme' (or something like that), and the way you'd know you'd been selected for a check, would be a reassessment form arriving in the post. For suspected fraud on the disability side, they investigate and either dismiss the accusation as baseless or gather evidence then call the person in for an interview under caution.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

quick story for me is my son was married had a son now 5 we looked afteter him at weekends and when she was off work or was working with no problems with her !!

about 2 years ago she met a fella got pregnant had the baby last December, 2 month before she had the baby she stopped the contact we had with my g/son we,v not seen him in 18 months its before the judge for 2nd time end of april, end of last month we got a statement saying my son shook the baby made him sleep on floor always left him with me beat up the wife and tried to set fire to house all the normal crap!! oops and she said my grandson came home with morphine tablets from my house ,,,YET iv never been on morphine tablets !! liquid morphine yes tablets no !! she wants to stop my son seeing his son because she wants a nice family life with her new fella and the 2 children without my son

yet 12 months ago she signed a statement saying my son was best thing since sliced bread with his son !!

cut the story short,,,,,

 

 

now its due back in court again is it a

coincidence or what a get a call to this interview ??!!

 

 

is someone trying to cause trouble ??

 

 

or has somebody got a big nasty gob !!

Edited by maggieomx
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't say for sure that it's a coincidence - it could be someone trying to make trouble, given everything else that's going on. But it's the Compliance team. Even if someone has made some allegation against you, it doesn't seem that the DWP are taking it seriously.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my interview is on the 14th april at 10.40 am

 

More than enough time for you to get worked up over nothing. The issues you mentioned with your son would not be of any concern to the DWP. If child abuse was being investigated, it would be social services and the police.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it has nothing to do with the dwp i was just showing whats going on here at the moment !! And exactly got another week to wait for it , my son looked after my g/son for 4 years every weekend and when she was working? And needed a baby sitter, right up to 18 months ago when she met her new fella !! Ago !!And like you said social services would of investigated it a couple of years, when it was supposed to of happened !! Not when she remembered it 2 weeks ago !

 

The so called abuse was supposed to of happened when he was 6 months old ??!! He,s now 5 !!

The reason i mentioned this is because shes duin her best to discredit us and she has started already to bring me into it by saying i gave g/son morphine tablets even though iv never been on them and now this seems like a coincidence its happened now or the social have got good timeing ??? Sorry for rambling on x

Edited by antone
Convert to mixed case
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have done nothing wrong they have achieved nothing by trying to cause trouble- other than causing you a load of worry. Don't let it worry you any more- don't hand them that victory. Just look upon it as a review of your claim x

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the capitals its late in the day and my eyes are tired and i cant read properly when there like that xx

 

Not to worry, I hit the caps by mistake a few times, good luck ....

 

PS

 

Love your review's on tp http://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/ShowUserReviews-g274772-d647063-r187454469-Oskar_Schindler_s_Factory-Krakow_Lesser_Poland_Province_Southern_Poland.html

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the capitals its late in the day and my eyes are tired and i cant read properly when there like that xx

 

Hello there.

 

I really don't like reading all capitals either. You can edit what you wrote in the first 24 hours if you click on the Edit Post button at the bottom of the relevant post and then retype it.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the capitals its late in the day and my eyes are tired and i cant read properly when there like that xx

 

I converted it to mixed case using this handy site. Paste in the all-caps text and choose the "Sentence Case" button.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...