Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That explains it then. MET's fantasy is that it's a pay car park.  You're only let off paying if you are a Starbucks customer which you can't be when Starbucks is closed.  'Cos otherwise lots of people would abuse the car park facilities on the far edge of the Stansted Airport area in the middle of nowhere to ... admire the bushes?  Look at the cloudy sky? The important thing is that we have around 140 cases for this site, and MET have only tried court seven times.  Even then, they had no intention of getting as far as a hearing, they were attempting to intimidate the motorists into paying, when the Caggers defended the cases MET discontinued.
    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Was 1997 Student Loan under my 2010 Bankrupcy? - Erudio now chasing


heidda
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2807 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I last deferred my loan with the SLC around 2012 so won't be sb'd for a while yet. Since then only communication I have had with SLC or Erudio was the CCA and SAR request. I will send another letter today about the mystery payment.

 

I have read the thread and am a bit puzzled. There has never been a period of 6 clear years, where you have not deferred the loans. Deferment acts as acknowledging the debts, so as you say they are not statute barred.

 

If they have received £10, then that is less for you to pay. You could ask for details, they realise a mistake and take the £10 off the account.

 

Now that you earn more than the threshold, at some point you are going to have to make payments. I guess that if you don't, they could take you to court. Have a search online to see whether Erudio are issuing court claims. You might want to avoid getting a CCJ.

 

That is my reading of the situation. How do you see the situation ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Your reading of the situation is correct.

I earn just above the threshold and cant afford to pay anything back at moment as my shifts haver been reduced at work.

If it was the SLC they may be more understanding but I dont want to deal with Eurdio and their sneaky tactics.

 

 

I have now received a Termination letter that I have attached.

They now demand full payment.

There no mention of being taking to court

but the usual stuff of they may contact the CRA's etc.

 

 

Has anyone else received these letters and does anyone know of anyone being taking to court?

 

 

I can't seem to find any evidence of this unless that have had an outstanding decree from the SLC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there have been two rumours that have done court twice

but both turned out not to be true.

as the posters here and on the likes of mums net provided no proof and disappeared when questioned.

 

 

there have also been instances whereby old CCJ/Decrees attained by the SLC have tried to be enforce by arrows

but again they don't really seem to have gotten anywhere as such bar willy waving.

 

 

pers I'd be riding this out

 

 

this £10 wasn't payment for your SAR was it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think you have much choice now, but to ride it out and see what happens. If it has been terminated, then the repayment would not be via the old loan terms.

 

The £10 on the account may be more important to establish now re stature barring, if it is more recent than your last repayment deferral.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The £10 postal order was sent to the SLC for the SAR.

Details of this are in post #59.

 

 

The SLC received the recorded letter the following day but some how Eurdio have managed to to get their hands on this a short while later.

 

 

The track and trace service from the post office said this was signed for by the SLC. Strange!

 

 

I thought the SLC dealt with the SAR and not Erudio.

 

 

It seems SLC have forwarded this onto Erudio.

 

 

When I received the SAR several months later there was a letter stating the SAR had been sent to Eurdio minus the £10 postal order.

 

 

Don't know if this was acccidently included.

SLC apoligised for the delay and enclosed a differant cheque for a £10 refund for not complying to my request in time.

 

 

I have details of the £10 postal order so going to contact the post office and see if they can tell me who cashed it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

capquest?

 

 

what are they doing with a SLC loan?

 

 

that's a first!!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received two letters.

 

 

One from Erudio saying that Capquest debt recovery are now managing my account.

 

 

I got a separate letter from Capquest (Same postcode on both envelopes of Huddersfield HD81DY)

 

 

saying they are managing my account on behalf of Erudio

and any future payments should be made to them although any direct debit or any continuous payment has been cancelled.

 

 

Take it that means they a requesting the full amount!

 

 

No mention of court action yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then you can ignore capquest

they are simply acting for their 'client'

 

 

and like their 'client' they can do bugger all!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

wake up brain...

 

 

arrows are Erudio- capquest are part of arrows.

 

 

long day sorry

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What can I expect fromCapquest? Harrassment/Court procedings etc? I was still waiting from answer from Eurdio about a few disputes when they transfered my debt to Capquest. I have now been getting phone calls from them too. Don't know how they got my num. Any info would be great.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just tell them in writing of the oustanding disputes with Eurdio and ask whether Capquest have taken over dealing with answering the disputes.

 

Have a look in the legal part of CAG to see if there is any evidence of them issuing court claims. If there outstanding disputes, you shoukd remind them in writing, as they should not be hassling you while disputes are ongoing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think they can mark your credit file.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Capquest can't add anything to your credit file.

 

Erudio may be able to if you have not deferred and not repaid, as you would have defaulted on the loan, depending on the original agreement terms for the years you took them out.

 

i.e. under clause 12(b) if you break the agreement, as you have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Windysock - What action did Capquest take against you in 2006?

 

Nothing. Just hot air.

 

Was SLC though directing things, so now it's Erudio it's their 'ball' so to speak.

 

No real evidence yet whether Erudio will take and legal measures eventually. So far no, but they are basically Arrow Global, who have been known to go to court, so who knows in the long game. You would suspect not, but would not like to say for certain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Just recieved a letter today that since my acount was defaulted last year they now intend to notifiy the CRA's with my default. I have 28 days before this will be done. I have a few questions to ask and any advice would be great.

 

Does this sound genuine that they will go ahead with this? I had a letter from Erudio last year that they would not be managing my account anymore after I defaulted and that it would be passed onto a DCA for collection. Can they still do this?

 

They state on their website that the default can be avoided by paying in full within 28 days. The account would then be closed. Do you think I could offer a final settlement of a percentage of the value of loan and this would avoid a default. Or could they still mark my file with a partial settlement?

 

If I do decide to contact them I only have a few weeks to do so. I know I should contact them by letter and never the phone but due to the short amount of time could I call them and record the call for evidence?

 

Any advice would be great!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erudio adding default and passing the debt on for another DCA to chase ?

 

Yes cannot see why not, if they have deed of assignment for this debt, you have defaulted and it is not statute barred.

 

If you last deferred in 2012, i would presume the default was in 2013 and not 2015. So you need to keep an eye on the date, if it added to your record.

 

Really depends on your plans in the next few years. Any default would be unhelpful, if you wanted to obtain any new loans.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

several people have reported getting these default letters

no-one has actually gotten a default yet afaik.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The latest letter mentions that from Sept 2016 Erudio will start to notify the CRA's. Read on another website that since they have sorted out historical paperwork they will start to contact CRA's. I'm undecided yet of how to move forward but if I did contact them and I offered them a settlement figure and they agreed could they mark my file as partially settled basically trashing my credit file anyway. Also, if the account is defaulted could they still chase me throught the courts for the debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defaulted or not they can do what they like

If they actually do is a totally diff matter

 

And I doubt they'd short settle either

 

Its a blinking game for you and 10,000,s of others

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...