Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

M&S aplliance Fridge/freezer playing up - just out of warranty period


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3756 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I hope someone can help.

 

We bought an LG Fridge for about £500 approx 4 years ago.

 

the temperature has gone on it

- it freezes food in the bottom of the FRIDGE and other food at the top of the FRIDGE comes out warm.

 

Also the water dispenser arm has completely broken off so the dispenser cannot be used.

 

Have been emailing the retailer for around the last 3/4 months to try and get this sorted.

 

They are demanding we get and pay for an engineer's report which must state that there was an inherent defect

in the fridge at time of sale

- which we say will be an impossibility for any engineer to say

- also that we haven't misused it etc,

- which we DEFINITELY have not.

 

This was a huge expense for us at the time and although it's out of warranty

we think for a large expensive item such as this it should last at least 10 years.

 

We paid by credit card and have tried writing to the credit card company about this too.

 

Please can anyone help with how we can get this resolved.

 

We've lost food as a result of the faulty temperature

and had to buy a small second hand fridge to tide us over whilst we're trying to sort this out.

 

Retailer very unhelpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI and welcome to CAG... Best thing i could say is get the report.

Yes a white good shouldnt ideally breakdown, but it does happen occasionally.

 

If its out of Warranty then you will have to pay for parts + labour etc,

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Have a read through the Sale of goods Act, it does state that a product should last for 6 years from time of purchase as long as it has been used and cared for etc. etc.

It also says that the product should be fit for purpose, you mentioned the broken water lever, was this a plastic malfunction?

 

Your food loss could be covered either by claiming from the store where you bought the fridgefreezer from or by checking your household insurance policy.

 

Remember that your contract is with whoever you purchased from, not the manufacturer.

 

Here is a link for a read through and at the bottom of the page a link to CAB...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006mg74/features/consumer-law-sale-of-goods

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

SOGA. However since its 4 years old, the retailer is right. You would need to obtain an independant engineers report. If it shows up as an inherent defect or similar, then the retailer has to repair it and refund the cost of the report. Or they can give you a like for like replacement. However, its their choice which to do out of the two options.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cartouble,

 

Do you know exactly when you bought the fridge.

 

Who did you buy it from.

 

What was the warranty on the item with regard to both parts and labour.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing to do with any warranty nor it being in or out its time limit

this will be a SOGA claim against retailer.

 

under soga a product should last 'a reasonable period'

 

for a fridge [ if this is a fridge or a fridge/ freezer - your description of the fault is not specific]

 

I would expect +4yrs for white goods

 

and yes section 75 on the credit card might well play a part here too

 

eitherway, sadly you'll need to get an engs report done

 

if the claim is upheld, then that'll be refunded

along with a repair if founded in your favour.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Many thanks for the replies people have sent.

 

In answer to some of the queries:

 

It was bought around Dec 2009/Jan 2010 and it first started not working properly around 4/6 months ago.

 

Bought from Marks & Spencer Appliances.

 

It is a fridge/freezer (50/50) and the fridge part is broken as it keeps freezing some things and then getting to hot for other things on top shelves. It cost around £500 which I consider to be a lot to spend on a fridge and would expect it to last easily 6-10 years for this level of cost.

 

The water dispenser arm is plastic and has just sheared off completely - it has not had excessive use or been used by children, only adults, and has been treated with respect so we know we're not at fault.

 

Can anyone pls help on the engineer's report.

 

Problems here are I don't know where to get one and really don't have the money for this

- what is it likely to cost?

 

But more worryingly I can't see how ANYONE could say that a fault which has appeared in an item was inherent,

i.e. present when it was manufactured.

 

If this is the standard required it seems to me impossible to satisfy.

 

If all the report had to say was that t is broken/not working in the way I've described and that this is not as a result of tampering/ill treatment

by me then that would seem fair but is this going to be enough.

 

Will it be easier to make the claim instead to the credit card company - does anyone know what is involved with this type of claim and whether it's likely to be successful.

 

Any help and advice gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I realise this is a SOGA issue but the warranty on parts and/or labour may be relevant if the appliance has only just dropped out of the warranty period. A retailer or manufacturer may be more willing to make a goodwill gesture if the warranty only recently expired.

 

You'd need a decent appliance eng'r to visit and report on the appliance. They won't have to say if the fault was inherent on delivery as suggested by the retailer. They'll have to report on the current condition of the appliance including what they suspect to be at fault.

 

Speak to a few local firms to ask how much this will cost.

 

They should also be able to tell you the likely cost to repair.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

theres another thread about M&S appliances here somewhere too

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...