Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ANPR Preston H&S Litigation services - claim form received? **Won at POPLA**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3778 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh my lord they actually sent that, you do realise its a load of cr@p I hope. That really needs complaining about to trading standards and whoever else will listen, Trevor was an idiot when he was a clamper it seems he has become even more of an idiot now he is issuing charges.

 

OMG!!!, i have never read such utter tosh on any claim form in my life (even if it isnt a real one)

 

Its illiterate, doesn't make sense and is utter tosh!!!!

 

Who is the arbitrator?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I looked at the 'claim form' earlier and thought 'what rot'. It is only now I looked again to see it is not stamped. What an absolute cheek!

 

Sending out these 'pretend' claim forms should be reported.

 

The BPA should be removing them from their lists.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

H & S Litigation

H&S LITIGATION SERVICES LTD

145-157 ST JOHN STREET

LONDON

ENGLAND

EC1V 4PW

Company No. 08530908spacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gifStatus: Active

Date of Incorporation: 15/05/2013

 

And their registered office address is a 'Virtual Office Mail Forwarding" service

 

So basically they have been in existence 7 months and don't actually have any real offices!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

they ticketed the car

 

They have sent photos after when i requested them They aren't time or date stamped as far as i can see .They also sent copys of the photos on a CD which included someone else's car with a ticket on it !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

To quote somebody from the MSE forum:-

 

"who or what the hell is H&S and in what capacity do they purport to act?

 

H&S Litigation do not employ a solicitor

H&S Litigation are not registered with the Law Society

H&S Litigation are not registered with the Solicitors Regulation Authority as an alternative business structure

H&S Litigation do not have a Consumer Credit Act licence and are not, therefore, registered as a debt collector

 

So what is it that they do? The implication is that they advise ANPR from a legal point of view but judging by the wording on the so-called claim form I can't imagine anybody with any degree of legal training willingly associating themselves with that."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I'm not a genius but I assume its ANPR way of adding to the scare effect by using a different name and the words (Litigation services) and i'm sure must work on people

 

I tried to ring the civil court in Preston this morning RE complaining about the claim form ,alas no humans about to answer.i should just write

 

Just spoke to POPLA re the lack of appeal number.They suggested writing back and if it dose not arrive there's something amiss and then complain to Trading standards etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have EXACTLY the same documents fromn H and S litigation !! Literally the spitting image, signed SR, , again the supposed court paper isnt stamped, there is no reference number, Who do i complain do to take these down? I SO hope they take me to court as i want to expose them for who they are!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I spoke to POPLA today.They advised writting to ANPR again to ask for a appeal ref .there advice was if not appeal number came then something was fishy

 

Tried to ring Trading Standards to day.All humans to busy to talk

 

Not sure who to send the complaint letter at the Ministry of justice ? I was thinking of going into the civil court in Preston to ask ? what do you think

 

Also anyone in particular to writ to at BPA

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

On their website H&S make it clear that they are actively seeking business.

 

And what sort of business would that be?

 

The business's name and their website blurb make it clear that they are offering a legal service

- but there is no one on their staff who is legally qualified

- well not qualified either as a legal executive or solicitor.

 

And if there was why would they get advice from a solicitor when they need to?

 

They are half claiming to collect debts too but don't have that crucial Consumer Credit Act licence to enable them to act legally as a debt collector.

 

Were I a gambling man taking into consideration the claim that

 

"With over 150yrs of car park management experience to draw from between us"

 

I'd be tempted to place a small wager that the person behind this is actually our old friend Trev.

 

However, with no other evidence of that it would be foolish to risk the bet and perhaps he just advises them, pro bono, on the side.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...