Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Portfolio chasing old HFC debt - Statue Barrred?


Wonderwall1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3087 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

BB

You know as well as I do that not being on your credit file means didly squat about SB.

 

They have not found him but they have found a previous address.

 

I think I would suggest contacting them with something like this

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Ref: XXXXXXXX

 

Under the provisions of The Consumer Credit (EU Directive) Regulations 2010 and also c.39 (s.74 (A&B) (VA)) CCA(1974) I wish to formally request a copy of the original overdraft agreement and relevant paperwork that you should be sending me annually, for the above numbered bank account with [enter bank name here].

 

As I held what can only be regarded as an 'Agreed Overdraft', which has now reverted to an 'Unauthorised Overdraft' then the lending becomes regulated in line with c.39 Part VA (s.74) (s.1(b)) CCA1974 meaning the normal rules and CCA(1974) protection applies to this account.

 

You should be sending an annual reminder to me regards the overdraft, as well as copies of the original agreement made and an annual renewal form that contains the relevant prescribed terms that are clearly outlined in s.74(A)2(a,b,c,d,e). I highlight this provision for your perusal;

s.74A(2) The current account agreement must include the following information at the time it is made:

(a)the rate of interest charged on the amount by which an account-holder overdraws on the current account or exceeds the pre-arranged overdraft limit,

(b)any conditions applicable to that rate,

©any reference rate on which that rate is based,

(d)information on any changes to the rate of interest (including the periods that the rate applies and any conditions or procedure applicable to changing that rate), and

(e)any other charges payable by the debtor under the agreement (and the conditions under which those charges may be varied).

You should also be paying attention to s.74(B)(2) which reads, I quote;

s.74B(2) The matters referred to in subsection (1) are:

(a)the fact that the current account is overdrawn or the overdraft limit has been exceeded,

(b)the amount of that overdraft or excess,

©the rate of interest charged on it, and

(d)any other charges payable by the debtor in relation to it (including any penalties and any interest on those charges).

Therefore in line with the above, please could you send me what you should have been doing annually and have not been, to allow me to take whatever action I deem appropriate.

 

I trust that I have set out the position clearly and I await your response with the requested information.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Sign Digitally

Head it formal complaint

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would ignore them completely until they send something of substance. All they have sent so far is a notice of Assignment.

 

The OP states than no acknowledgement has been made in 6 years , nor payment so if they send anything to the OP, the only thing that needs to be sent back is the SB letter. Not a letter for any agreements. If its SB, lowell will say you paid a random amount in late 2007/early 2008. Then when you challenge them, theyll say its an "admin error".

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you don't know for SURE the debts are SB'd DONT send the SB letter.

that can be classed as acking the debt & resets the 6yrs SB clock.

 

as for the cra stuff.

 

its a whole lot better as BB says to get the cra file

and use your real address.

 

then check ALL your old addresses are linked.

 

if they send an SD or a claimform to your old address you've NO defence. [sent to wrong ad one]

 

even if it does wake them up to where you are

it'll take then/you a good few months to run through the CCa lark

to check the debts are properly assign

 

esp if they have been sold.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The simple fact is the tracing methods used today will find on the ER or not, any account or service you use will be sharing your data.

 

As BB says use the CRAs even try Noddle from call credit which is free always.

 

This is the only way you can assess your debts.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of good advice there.

 

As DX says you need to be 100% sure it is SB.

I know that on my current account it was some months from me last making any payment into it before they defaulted then terminated the account

so the 6 years from last payment would not work for me, its nearer 7 years.

(We had a good 6-9 months of please clear your unauthorised OD to we are withdrawing your OD to we are closing your account please pay us.

 

I perfectly understand why you would want to hide

but it may not be the best option in the long run.

 

As you have no bank account you may have some difficulty getting your credit report as they will want to see proof of ID

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

UPDATE -

 

I wanted to get into 2014 to ensure that my debts should be SB now

( I know for a fact that I have not paid a penny to any creditor since 1/12/07),

so technically they should all be SB

( unless of course they all have CCJ's attached to them, in which case none of them are/ever will be SB).

 

Letters still flowing to my dads address from Lowells, and again I have just been marking them as return to sender/does not live here ( which is not a lie as I do not live there).

 

Getting a bit worried now though because I read all over the internet that Lowells are very fond of making you bankrupt!!!

 

I want to get my credit report, but I don't have a bank account and am petrified of putting my current address down anywhere ( not even on voters roll etc).

 

I have a funny feeling that Lowells wont just go away.

 

What should I do?

 

I want to just write to Lowells with all the great letter templates on here, but on the other hand I don't.

 

HELP!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is still with Lowells and not passed to any Solicitors,

then it appears they are not currently seeking enforcement.

 

Which begs the question, as to whether Lowells already know it is not a debt they can go to court with.

 

You could therefore wait to see whether Lowells pass the debt to anyone else,

by at least checking what they are sending you.

Steam the letters open and send them back if they are just asking for your money.

 

You could send the original creditors an SAR,

for copies of all documents including statements.

 

You could check Trustonline for any CCJ's without giving your current address away.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks unclebulgaria.

 

I have been steaming the letters and they are just asking me to contact them,

I think one of them offering a reduction etc etc.

They all get sent back after reading.

I will look into Trustonline as would be good to know if I have any CCJs ( ref: SB ).

 

Both debts are current accounts,

how does that affect SB? / Letters I should send?

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps more tricky with current accounts, as you would need to know when the bank defaulted the accounts.

 

They may have kept the accounts going for a number of months, adding charges, before they eventually defaulted them.

If you wanted to make sure you could SAR the banks.

 

If Lowells thought they could take to court, they would have done so by now or have Sols threatening this.

 

In your shoes, I would just check Trustonline for now to make sure no CCJ's.

 

Perhaps at some point you will summon the courage to check your credit history and if these debts are not on there, then they are most likely to be statute barred.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh so SB doesnt happen until 6 years after the Default Notice?

 

I just checked Trustonline - 1 CCJ for £3k in April 2008.

 

I suppose I would have to contact Northampton Court on Monday to find out the claimant?

It could be 1 of the current accounts, but just a "could".

 

Also you say Lowells would of issued SD by now,

but I have only been receiving letters from November 2013,

surely they don't issue that quick anyway do they??

 

Thanks again, a great help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The successful claimant has 6 years from the CCJ date to gain enforcement. The could go to court to ask for more time, but this is not often allowed apparently. You could enquire with Northampton Court, but not sure of the point, unless you are looking to settle. They could tell you the claimant name, which might be useful I suppose.

 

If during 2014 these debts will become statute barred or no further enforcement can be carried out, then I am not sure why you would want to making enquiries about them, unless you really wanted to deal with them.

 

Keep an eye on the post and see what is being said. If they want to enforce further, you will get something in the post, court claim or Solicitors letter saying that they will be taking court action.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

pers i'd let them run.

 

esp as you've had discount offers

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The successful claimant has 6 years from the CCJ date to gain enforcement. The could go to court to ask for more time, but this is not often allowed apparently. You could enquire with Northampton Court, but not sure of the point, unless you are looking to settle. They could tell you the claimant name, which might be useful I suppose. - I would like to know if the CCJ is for the debt Lowells are chasing - if it is then the 6 year SB doesn't count, I suppose they have until 04/14 ( 6 years from the CCJ ) to enforce the CCJ or after that they cant.

 

If during 2014 these debts will become statute barred or no further enforcement can be carried out, then I am not sure why you would want to making enquiries about them, unless you really wanted to deal with them. - If current accounts are SB 6 years from the DEFAULT NOTICE date, how do I find out when they were defaulted ( Credit Report ? )

 

Keep an eye on the post and see what is being said. If they want to enforce further, you will get something in the post, court claim or Solicitors letter saying that they will be taking court action.

- Wont it be too late when I get a Statutory Demand or Enforcement of CCJ letter to do the whole letter template thing ( SB / SAR etc...)?

Help very much appreciated, you don't know me from adam, but are helping, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

- Wont it be too late when I get a Statutory Demand or Enforcement of CCJ letter to do the whole letter template thing ( SB / SAR etc...)?

Help very much appreciated, you don't know me from adam, but are helping, thank you.

 

If you are eager to deal with these debts, then go for it. Find out who go the CCJ, get your credit report. Send off CCA's for any relevant debt ( not the CCJ one) and SAR's.

 

At the moment they don't know where you are living and Lowells are offering you discounts.

 

The choice is yours. Cannot make it for you.

Edited by honeybee13
Name change

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are eager to deal with these debts, then go for it. Find out who go the CCJ, get your credit report. Send off CCA's for any relevant debt ( not the CCJ one) and SAR's. - I don't want to deal with them , I just don't want to find out they made me bankrupt when there MIGHT of been something I could of done to prevent it.

 

At the moment they don't know where you are living and Lowells are offering you discounts. - I thought they could make me bankrupt irrespective of knowing my current address or not? - Them offering discounts - I assume you mean that with them offering discounts they think that its unlikely to go for a BO?

 

The choice is yours. Cannot make it for you.- Appreciate that, just worried.

 

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Find out the claimant for the CCJ first and post back when you find out.

 

Do you actually know what debts you have and roughly when any defaults might have been added ? If so, can you provide a rough list of what they are ? Type of debt, roughly when you took the account out and roughly when you defaulted.

 

DCA's generally offer discounts, because the type of debt might indicate loads of charges, the CCA might not be available enforceable or it could be statute barred.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Find out the claimant for the CCJ first and post back when you find out.

 

Do you actually know what debts you have and roughly when any defaults might have been added ? If so, can you provide a rough list of what they are ? Type of debt, roughly when you took the account out and roughly when you defaulted.

 

DCA's generally offer discounts, because the type of debt might indicate loads of charges, the CCA might not be available enforceable or it could be statute barred.

 

 

Ok will post back when I get the info - Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Find out the claimant for the CCJ first and post back when you find out.

 

Do you actually know what debts you have and roughly when any defaults might have been added ? If so, can you provide a rough list of what they are ? Type of debt, roughly when you took the account out and roughly when you defaulted.

 

DCA's generally offer discounts, because the type of debt might indicate loads of charges, the CCA might not be available enforceable or it could be statute barred.

 

 

Okay,

 

spoke to the court today and

 

the CCJ IS the same debt Lowell are chasing.

 

After phoning Northampton Court, they told me it was transferred to my local county court.

I panicked over this as though that it had only recently been transferred,

but after speaking with Northampton a 2nd time they said it was transferred as soon as the judgement was granted.

 

So Lowells have a CCJ for the debt they are chasing,

and the 6 years to enforce it runs out in 70 days.

 

I am still trying to work out a way to get a credit report without revealing my current address

( only been here 2 years and not on voters, no credit here under my name ),

 

I have tried to use my wifes card to credit check my previous ( where all credit is registered ),

but it wont let me use her card,

and I cant do it by post as obviously it will be sent to the previous address!.

 

Shall I wait and see if Lowells try to enforce the CCJ through the County Court?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who actually got the CCJ ? You only mention it is the same debt.

 

It is quite often the case that creditors will sell on debts even if they have CCJ's.

 

I am a bit suspicious that Lowells were not the ones who obtained the CCJ,

 

as I don't think back in 2008 Lowells did this a lot.

 

Plus surely wouldn't they mention the CCJ in their letters?

 

Post back to confirm whether it was Lowells who were the claimant for the CCJ.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who actually got the CCJ ? You only mention it is the same debt.

 

It is quite often the case that creditors will sell on debts even if they have CCJ's. I am a bit suspicious that Lowells were not the ones who obtained the CCJ, as I don't think back in 2008 Lowells did this a lot. Plus surely wouldn't they mention the CCJ in their letters?

 

Post back to confirm whether it was Lowells who were the claimant for the CCJ.

 

 

The 1st letter I have had from Lowells (ever) was November 2013 at my fathers home.

 

Unless of course they were sending letters to my previous address ( left there April 2008 ) for the last 6 years which I doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claimant is the original creditor - HFC BANK PLC

 

So Lowells have no rights of enforcement under the CCJ and would have to apply to a court to be substituted.

This is not an easy process and therefore they don't really have much chance to do this before the 6 years runs out.

( At the moment HFC have the enforcement rights per the court, but they won't obviously because they have sold the debt on):madgrin:

 

So panic is therefore over, you don't have to worry about this.

 

I would wait until February has gone by to check your credit records,

just in case Lowells are alerted and make an urgent application to be substituted.

 

I presume that there is a court process,

 

where they could make an urgent application for it to be considered,

 

hence waiting until you know the 6 years has gone by.

Edited by honeybee13
Name change

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Lowells have no rights of enforcement under the CCJ and would have to apply to a court to be substituted. This is not an easy process and therefore they don't really have much chance to do this before the 6 years runs out. ( At the moment HFC have the enforcement rights per the court, but they won't obviously because they have sold the debt on):madgrin:

 

So panic is therefore over, you don't have to worry about this. I would wait until February has gone by to check your credit records, just in case Lowells are alerted and make an urgent application to be substituted. I presume that there is a court process, where they could make an urgent application for it to be considered, hence waiting until you know the 6 years has gone by.

 

 

Ah I see, I thought Lowells could apply to enforce it. The CCJ was granted Mid-April 2008, so you think 3 months isn't enough time for them to substitute?

 

 

Bet they send me a bloody SD instead!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...