Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I applied to the Court to act as litigation friend has my son is Severely Mentally Impaired and sent the proof they requested from his GP so I thought this might have been accepted without a hearing. I cannot believe the claimant is still convinced my son was the driver.
    • I had to call an ambulance for my wife, but one of the paramedics was not happy, about the condition of our house, as it's cluttered. And he  would only see to my wife, on the ambulance itself. After diagnosis they took my wife to hospital. My wife was ill for a few months, and received help from the district nurses. We then got a call from a social worker, who wanted to visit us, and discuss ways to make my wife more comfortable. When I asked for more details, she became vague, but could give us a phone number, if she visited. I politely declined her offer, as I was coping, along with my daughter in caring for my wife. Then a letter arrived from another social worker, saying similar things, to the first. I didn't bother to reply. Another letter has just turned up, from the social services legal department, which doesn't say anything specific, but refers to the other social workers trying to visit us. Coming from a legal department, has badly upset my wife, who's recovery was on going, and she now fears that someone will be coming to the house, to do whatever. Do we have to respond, or take notice of these people. Also we recently had a fire prevention officer come and fit, smoke and heat detectors. He didn't voice any concerns with the conditions at the property. Worried, Paul.
    • By not sticking to the deadline which you set you have lost credibility. Your letter of claim becomes one of hundreds of others which they receive and which they put in the bin because they think that you are just bluffing.  
    • 05.05.24 Ever so sorry if I have entered this in the wrong part of this website.   My grandfather is in his 70's and retired.  He asked me to help him find a work pension that he was paying into when he was working. From 1967 - 1982 he worked for a Fabric Dying Company, Celanese, Spondon Derby UK. I have already used the GOV.uk Trace Pension Scheme. It listed a few pension companies : Akzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme formerly Courtaulds Pension Scheme.  I do not fully understand how this works but I think this scheme is administer by a company called Willis Tower Watson. We have called this company, got through to the pension department submitted all my grandfather's details (D.O.B. , N.I. no. etc.) but that agent tells that they have no record of my grandfather and ask what is the name of the pension scheme. Here is the problem, his home was burgalled in 2005 and a briefcase which contained his legal documents was stolen. So he does not know who was the Pension Scheme company. I have a this phone number 01332 681 210 for Celanese but it just rings and never gets answered. So I am asking for help if anyone can tell us where we can try next. I am also hoping for a massive long shot that one of them members on this website, worked for or knows someone who worked for British Celanese Spondon Derby and could tell us of any pension company. Thanks for any help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

35 hour a week Jobsearh


Flickyhecky
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3766 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just to note that this is an old thread. Perhaps you'd be better off starting a new thread about your concerns, rather than repeatedly posting these JPGs on other ones.

 

This is merely a suggestion, not a moderator instruction. It's an interesting topic.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the new UC regulation for those that are claiming the old JSA.

 

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/269422/foi-3786-13-eg-claimant-commitment-annex1.pdf

 

 

You will note that apart from job hunting, and walking the streets for up to 120 miles in any direction of your home, you will be mandated to carry out voluntary work to make up the 35 hours a week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

[...]walking the streets for up to 120 miles in any direction of your home

 

This is scaremongering and impossible. The commitment, as does its predecessor, the JSag, states: "[find and take work that] is within 90 minutes' travel from my home"

 

The distance travelled to meet this 90 minute requirement is highly dependent on the modes of transport available. Another point worth considering - If travel expenses leave you worse off, you would not (usually) be penalised for turning down a job offer.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You will note that apart from job hunting, and walking the streets for up to 120 miles in any direction of your home, you will be mandated to carry out voluntary work to make up the 35 hours a week.

 

You most certainly will not be expected to walk 120 miles to work, or to look for work.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You most certainly will not be expected to walk 120 miles to work, or to look for work.

 

You missed the point - I meant 'walking the streets up to 120 miles away from home'.

 

 

As an example would the JC expect me to look for work in say Peterborough, Cambridge, Ipswich or maybe Bedford all of which I can easily reach by car within 90 mins from Canterbury?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is scaremongering and impossible. The commitment, as does its predecessor, the JSag, states: "[find and take work that] is within 90 minutes' travel from my home"

 

The distance travelled to meet this 90 minute requirement is highly dependent on the modes of transport available. Another point worth considering - If travel expenses leave you worse off, you would not (usually) be penalised for turning down a job offer.

 

I agree, Cambridge, Bedford, Peterborough and Ipswich are all within a 90min drive of Canterbury. Have a look at a map to see what I am talking about.

 

 

So those who have to rely on public transport might only have to travel say 20 miles or so to look for work, whilst others with a car will have to look for a job up to 120 miles away from home? And you think that it is reasonable and fair?

 

 

I wouldn't want to put the JC to a test. A job is a job to them even if it would cost you 70% of your weekly wage in just getting to work. More than likely they would counter the argument to tell you to either move home or stay in a B&B instead during the working week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where does the 120 miles come from? Surely, the JCP wouldn't expect you to travel that far? When I claimed JSA, I was told I'd have to travel up to 60 minutes each way. I explained that I don't drive; so depending on the transport used, it may get me to the main hospital or to Exeter. I was told it doesn't matter where it gets me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where does the 120 miles come from? Surely, the JCP wouldn't expect you to travel that far? When I claimed JSA, I was told I'd have to travel up to 60 minutes each way. I explained that I don't drive; so depending on the transport used, it may get me to the main hospital or to Exeter. I was told it doesn't matter where it gets me.

 

In another thread, solbert asserted that 90 mins by car was 120 miles. Which it is, if you average 80mph. Even if that were legal, there are very few places in the UK where it's even possible.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In another thread, solbert asserted that 90 mins by car was 120 miles. Which it is, if you average 80mph. Even if that were legal, there are very few places in the UK where it's even possible.

 

 

Absolutely! I live in a city right next a motorway, as do my in laws about 110 miles away from me. When I used to be able to manage to drive that distance, all on motorways (10 minutes each end to get from the house to the motorway), the average drive time (over the years of visiting them) was around 2.5 hours. Even on motorways, it's rare to be able to go long distances at the maximum legal speed limit.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

You missed the point - I meant 'walking the streets up to 120 miles away from home'.

 

 

As an example would the JC expect me to look for work in say Peterborough, Cambridge, Ipswich or maybe Bedford all of which I can easily reach by car within 90 mins from Canterbury?

 

Right, I see. Well yes, you would be expected to accept work that is within 90 mins drive, and to attend arranged job interviews in these places. You would not be expected to drive around on spec to Cambridge or Ipswich or wherever.

 

Edit to add: none of the places you listed can be reached from Canterbury in 90 mins driving at legal speeds.

  • Haha 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where does the 120 miles come from? Surely, the JCP wouldn't expect you to travel that far? When I claimed JSA, I was told I'd have to travel up to 60 minutes each way. I explained that I don't drive; so depending on the transport used, it may get me to the main hospital or to Exeter. I was told it doesn't matter where it gets me.

 

 

 

From what has been said on this thread you will be expected to travel for up to 90mins to get to a job interview and take a job.

 

 

Based on that and my regular experience of using the M20, M25, M11, it would take me to those destinations which are at least 120 miles away in 90 mins by private transport. Grief if I just wanted to get to London (St Pancras) by public transport it would only take me 53mins by train to do the 80 odd miles. Using that as another example, who would pay me the day return £35 cost of using the train?

 

 

Just for a 5 day week the train fare would be £175 out of the £250 weekly wage at NMW level.

 

 

As I have said I think that this is a wind up and the JC would only expect you to travel say a max of 10 miles using any type of transport. To prejudice someone because they have a car is totally unfair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In another thread, solbert asserted that 90 mins by car was 120 miles. Which it is, if you average 80mph. Even if that were legal, there are very few places in the UK where it's even possible.

 

It may not be entirely legal, but if I was to drive at 70mph on the M20/M25/M11 everything on the road would be overtaking me including the odd Reliant Robin! (strange as it may be one was clocked at 105mph on the M20 a few years back - obviously going downhill with a tail wind!)

 

 

The M20 to Dartford is a cruise at 90mph, the M25 averages maybe 50mph, whilst the M11 sees speeds of up to 100mph. Fortunately there are no speed cameras on that particular route.

Edited by solbert
Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely! I live in a city right next a motorway, as do my in laws about 110 miles away from me. When I used to be able to manage to drive that distance, all on motorways (10 minutes each end to get from the house to the motorway), the average drive time (over the years of visiting them) was around 2.5 hours. Even on motorways, it's rare to be able to go long distances at the maximum legal speed limit.

 

Then you have not used the M20 or the M11!

 

 

Then you must be setting your cruise control to 70 and not driving according to the road conditions. I regularly use the M20/M25/M11/A1M/M62 to get to Manchester (308 miles) and wouldn't expect to be there after a max of 4.5 hours. Normally it is just over the 4 hours non stop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, I see. Well yes, you would be expected to accept work that is within 90 mins drive, and to attend arranged job interviews in these places. You would not be expected to drive around on spec to Cambridge or Ipswich or wherever.

 

Edit to add: none of the places you listed can be reached from Canterbury in 90 mins driving at legal speeds.

 

 

Err they can at a speed that is normal for the traffic. I've yet to see many that drive at 70 nowadays.

 

 

I don't know where you are but Canterbury to Cambridge would take a max of 1 hour 52 mins, driving at speeds up to 70mph. Driving at speeds consistent with the traffic flow would see that journey time come down to 90 mins - I do the journey every month!

 

 

So if a job came up in Cambridge for 40 hours at NMW and I could prove that I could get there in less than 90 mins, would the JC make me take it even though it would cost me £50 a day in fuel alone to get there and back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought the M62 went to Liverpool or Hull, solbert?

 

HB

 

Errr yes it goes to Liverpool after passing the outskirts of Greater Manchester. If you want to go to the centre then use a few miles of the M60 until you get to the Trafford Centre via Barton Bridge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Solbert surprised to see you're still being allowed to post on here. See MSE have already shut you down with this username.

 

Why? MSE thought that I was a little too near the mark when answering a question. I was brought up to believe that a spade is a spade and not a garden implement. Some people don't like to hear the truth - they prefer it to be dressed up with a pink bow!

 

 

Can't see any on here that have that PC mind set. They prefer the truth, warts & all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, we're just a little more tolerant of WUMs.

 

Our tolerance does have limits, though. It's a kindness, really - he spends too much time on here and not enough time with poor, neglected Flo.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Solbert surprised to see you're still being allowed to post on here. See MSE have already shut you down with this username.

 

Ahh, the ever reasonable MSE forums. Home of the ardent benefit bashers, some of the posters on there have their heads so far up their fundamental orifices they can see breakfast coming.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you travel to manchester in 4 1/2 hours you must be a) breaking the speed limit and b) going at very very off peak hours.

 

Barton Bridge is more often than not congested as are the parts of the M62 round Leeds. Again once you get onto the M60 it is not exactly foot to the floor territory.

 

Being deliberately difficult is not helping anyone.

 

I have to say though that when I was looking for work , it was pretty much a full time job once you took into account writing targeted CV's , targeted letters and then getting some interviews. Of course the level of job you are applying for makes a difference.

 

I recently went through UJ for someone and was not able to find a single job he could do either because it needed a driving licence, was outside publc transport hours and or outside hi reasonable skill set

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...