Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • thread title updated. so a sold debt. who are the solicitors? TM legal? why didn't ovo do this themselves as they do but chose to sell the debt on for 10p=£1? funny debt you state you reived a letter of claim, why did you not reply too it.? also is there is no indication of the date this bill comes from on the claimform? how do you know its from 2022? what other previous paperwork have you received? please scan page 1 of the claimform and bothsides of ALL previous letters upto one mass pdf read upload carefully. .................. pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466952-lowelloverdales-claimform-old-cap1-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5260464 .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
    • Thank you again. I'm hoping it will come out in the wash and will endeavour to check my online account. I'm a bit unsettled by not hearing from Booking.com but the host is sounding helpful at the moment. HB
    • I've just remembered that a friend of mine had bookings cancelled on Booking.com about a month ago - and the good news is that all worked out in the wash. I'm at work now but will scribble properly in a couple of hours with the full tale.
    • Thank you Dave. I've had nothing from Booking.com, just a message via the site from the host. I know I need to check my bank account, just trying to resolve some technical issues. HB  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre Name of the Claimant ? JC INTERNATIONAL AQUISITION How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self Date of issue – 22 May 2024  Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – 1. The def owes the claimant £300 in respect of gas and electricity charges supplied by OVO. 2. Debt was assigned to the claimant with notice given to the def. 3. Despite formal demand the def has failed to pay the debt and the claimant claims £300 and further claims interest pursuant to s69 of the CCA 1984. What is the total value of the claim? £385 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Energy debt When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Moved home and they were the current energy supplier  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax/Etc...) ? No Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt assigned to JC International Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not sure probably  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Again can't remember but probably  Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No Why did you cease payments? Changed supplier What was the date of your last payment? Never  Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Devere Parking and lapsed blue badge


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3910 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks to Skiboy for that useful information...Just goes to show that most ppcs have a dodgy background and drive nice cars after falsely obtaining money off people with idle threats.....Reminds me of Gary Osner - Roxburghes front man & BPA Elect who turned up at my case and told the judge he was Michael Sobell's driver.....shame I didn't know him at the time, could have asked for contempt......needless to say they all made fools of themselves and lost !! Id love a front row seat to see Devere standing before a court bringing a case involving a Blue Bage on private land :whoo::whoo:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

link doesnt work, youve been rumbled by the man.

No tax disc on a vehicle in a proper public car park wont get you a valid PCN, long standing case precedent from Cheam Library car park and Sutton council. Their argumant was that the car may be lawfully parked without a tax disc because it wasnt a public highway but it must have got there somehow. Judge said how it got there is of no business to Sutton Council- case dismissed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly,

 

any offences regarding Blue Badges and the Road Traffic Act can only be prosecuted by statutory bodies ie the Police or Local Authority.

 

Moreover, if a private company or individual should try to make punitive charges (no matter how they might dress them up or call them something else)

they themselves are likely guilty of offences under the Administration of Justice Act and Theft Act relating to blackmail so put in a complaint to the police if they hassle you.

 

And even if you accept there is a legally binding contract then it will be unfair as per the Unfair terms regulations 1999.

 

I personally don't agree with the ignoring them policy, just get your facts straight,

do the research (there's plenty of people who will help - pepipoo are a great community)

and take these rogue traders head on.

 

Oh and when you win don't forget to counterclaim and like me have a good time at their expense when it's all over!

When they are challenged properly they lose every time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx,

Sorry, I may be a bit thick. I still don't see the basis of the defense you are giving.

 

I know that if I were to stipulate that anyone entering my flat for a party, say, was required to bring a teddy bear,

say, I would be entitled to refuse entry to my flat to anyone not showing a teddy bear.

I would be legally entitled to ask someone to leave who didn't show a teddy bear and take action if they refused.

You may read anything in place of the teddy bear, no matter how silly - my private flat, I'm allowed to make the rules. Agreed?

 

Trite example but hopefully it helps to illustrates the point.

 

Contract law is just a formalisation of this basis for sociable behaviour, albeit much messed about by lawyers over a long time.

 

AFAIK, the only legal exceptions to any terms I may require are when my terms require someone to break the law e.g. bring heroin, unlicensed firearms and so on.

 

Nobody has a right to use any private land owned by another party, even if that land is a car park.

The owner may grant someone access provided that the someone complies with the conditions laid down by the owner.

They may even require extra conditions for a special spot e.g. require black tie to be worn in the VIP lounge.

 

Given the above example your posts seem to imply that blue badges have less legal status than teddy bears or black ties? Or could a blue badge requirement be seen as an unfair term?

 

Or am I barking up the wrong tree altogether?

 

The question you need to ask is Does Devere own the land? as based on your teddy bear argument I could say anyone going into your flat without a teddy bear has to pay me £100 even though I do not rent or own your flat

Link to post
Share on other sites

link doesnt work, youve been rumbled by the man.

.

 

Copy saved, the author was LEE and the document was created on 22/05/2013.

 

Can we ask the OP if he wants to pursue things or are things being pursued via other channels ? Has anyone been in touch by PM/e-mail ? Has the OP paid ?

 

Devere do not own the land and there is more excellent info available ref Devere and this location that needs to be kept off forum. The trouble is the required no of posts before you can PM on here means it isn't going to happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Regardless of who owns the land this is from the CAB website

 

"The blue badge scheme does not apply on private roads, private car parks, in off street car parks and in some airports.

 

There may be some parking spaces for disabled people in these areas and they will

 

either

 

be subject to the conditions imposed by the parking operator

 

or

 

be designated by law, with signs and markings that make this clear.

 

If the parking space is designated by law and it is used by a non-blue badge holder, this is a parking offence.

It will be enforced in the same way as on-street parking, by the police or by the local authority"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...