Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have never heard of any such law. Please post a link to what you have read online that explains this law. And please confirm whether you were ever married to or in a formal Civil Partnership with your Ex.
    • Today has been hectic so  have been unable to complete the whole thing. If you now understand it and want to go ahead with a complaint to the IPC, fine. If not then I won't need to finish it. But below is my response to your request  on post 64. No you don't seem stupid, the Protection of Freedoms Act isn't easy to get one 's head around at first. The part of the above Act referring to private parking is contained within Schedule 4 which you can find online under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Section 9 of SCH.4 relates to how the parking scrotes have to perform so that they can transfer their right to pursue the keeper from the driver when the PCN is still unpaid after a certain amount of time. In your case the PCN was posted to you the keeper and arrived within 14 days from when they claimed a breach occurred. That means they complied with first part of the Act. The driver at that time was still responsible to pay the charge demanded on the PCN and PCM now have to wait for 28 days to elapse before they can write and advise the keeper that as the charge has not been paid, that they now have the right to pursue the keeper. They claim they sent the first PCN on the 13th March, five days after the alleged breach and it arrived on Friday 15th March. So to comply with the Act they have to observe Section 8 subsection 2f   (f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given— (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So the first PCN was deemed to arrive on the 15th March and for 28 days to have elapsed is when the time is right for them to write and say you are now liable as keeper. So they sent the next PCN on the 12th April which is too early as you could still have paid until midnight of the 12th. So the earliest their second PCN should have gone to you was  Saturday 13th April so more likely on Monday 15th April. The IPC Code of Conduct states "Operators must be aware of their legal obligations and implement the relevant legislation and guidance when operating their businesses." So by issuing your demand a day early, they have broken the Act, the IPC Code of Conduct, the DVLA agreement  to abide by the law and the Code of Conduct not to mention a possible breach of your GDPR .   I asked the IPC  in the letter on an earlier to confirm that  CPMs Notice misrepresenting the law was a standard practice for all of PCMs Notices or just certain ones. Their distribution  may depend on when they were issued and whether they were issued in certain localities or for certain breaches. Whichever method used is a serious breach of the Law and could lead to PCM being black listed by the DVLA . One would expect that after that even if the IPC did not cancel your ticket, PCM could not risk going to Court with you nor even pursuing you any further.
    • thanks jk2054 - do you know any law i can quote (regarding timeframe) when sending the email as if i cant they'll probably just say no like the normal staff have done? thanks.
    • I lived there with her up until I gave notice. She took over the tenancy in her name. I had a letter from the council and a refund of the council tax for 1 month.    She took on the bills and tenancy and only paid the rent. No utility bills or council tax were paid once she took it over. She will continue to not pay bills in her new house which I'm now having to pay or will have to. I have looked online I believe the police and solicitors are going by the partner law to make me liable.   I have always paid my bills and ensured her half was paid then see how much free money is over.   She spends all her money on payday loans and rubbish then panics about the rent. I usually end up paying it or having to get her a loan.   Stupidly in my name but at the time it was because she was my partner. I even paid to move her and clean and decorate her old house so she got the deposit back. It cost me £3000 due to the mess she always leaves behind.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Crawfords Please read my story re Crawfords loss adjusters


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3790 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

As any body had the misfortune of dealing with Crawford Loss Adjusters?

 

This is my story so far.

 

1, on the 8th of February, the water tank in the loft burst causing extensive damage to bathrooms and 2 bedrooms.

 

2, We contacted our insurance Nationwide and home emergency call out which resulted in tap being capped and so we had no water in the house. Further the plumber believed that the ceilings had asbestos.

 

3, Our insurance company appointed Crawfords to handle the claim, a surveyor visited the property and access the damage caused.

 

4, On the 12th February, we were contact by ICAB telling us alternative accommodation has been arranged at a hotel for us all until buildings works are completed. We were happy that at last we will water to use and not have to buy gallons of bottled water.

 

5, My autistic son objected to the changes and found it difficult to cope then he took a shine to one of the waitress at the hotel and the he began to relax, my eldest daughter was in the middle of A level revisions and we had no internet access at the hotel. It would cost £14 per day, this made revision difficult and my 9 year old daughter just thought it was brilliant staying in the hotel!

 

6, A team of specialist came and remove the asbestos ceiling from all the rooms affected, the house now looks like a derelict building. Then nothing no more work was being done on the property.

 

7, There was not much contact between ourselves and Crawfords however ICAB was in regular contact with us. Crawford wanted end the accommodation even though there was no water in the house and ICAB even took it upon themselves to argue with Crawfords about extending our accommodation because the there was no running water.

 

8, By the 5th April I was getting concern that no works is being done on the house, I asked the man of the house to chase up and get things moving, but he found it difficult to deal with staff member who were being unhelpful.

 

9, I contacted Nationwide, they put me through to Crawfords but they not helpful eventually I was told to contact Home Emergency as they are dealing with the plumbing side of things. Home Emergency demanded payment of £325 for the plumber to come and fix the tank and I promptly made the payment.

 

10, The plumber attended the property on the 8th April, for some reason he was not happy to do the job, he spent over 2 hours on his mobile phone pacing angrily up and down the front of the house. He eventually came inside the house to start installing the tank.

 

11, It was getting late and so I took the kids back to the hotel around 8.30 pm living my husband in the house with the plumber.

 

12, I chased the builders and advised them that the tank had been fitted so they can come and do the building work. The builders confirmed they will start work on the 18th April. The plumber left the house in such a bad state and also managed to damage my carpets!

 

13, On the 11th April, ICAB informed me that Crawford are not willing to extend our stay in the hotel and are insisting we move back home. I explained the conditions to ICAB and they tried so hard to get Crawford to use their common sense but to no avail.

 

14, I contacted Crawford myself and basically told me they couldn’t careless what the condition of the house was, they have made a decision not to extent the accommodation and that was that.

 

15, I was shocked by their attitude, I just couldn’t believe it. I contacted Nationwide and explained the situation to them and also emailed photos of the state of the house. Nationwide agreed that the living condition was unacceptable and immediately extended our accommodation stay to the 15th April.

 

16, Then on the 15th April the Crawford ended the accommodation, and this time they was so rude and abrupt with me. They treated us like beggars and second class citizens. Their attitude was so unprofessional, and I have never experience such behaviour in my whole life before.

 

17, I told Crawford the house is still in the same state it was the previous week and it is about to get worse with the builders starting work soon, common sense dictates that if the house was not habitable the previous week and nothing has been since therefore it is still not habitable. Crawford then started telling lies that our accommodation ended on the 11th and it was not extended beyond that. I referred them to ICAB and Nationwide but they persisted and believing their lies.

 

18, I contacted the Nationwide to explain the situation, unfortunately the claim handler I spoke with was absolutely hopeless and became very arrogant and rude after speaking with Crawford. In fact she said her colleague was wrong by extending our accommodation the previous week. She went further to say that it was costing too much to put us in an alternative accommodation therefore we should go back home and live in the house as it is irrespective of our health and safety.

 

She then went on to say that I have a four bedroom house and I should therefore sleep in the other bedroom. I tried to explain the dynamics of our family to her and the reasons why it would be possible to share bed with a 15 year olds autistic boy, 17year old studying for her A levels, everybody needs their own beds and privacy, it fell on deaf ears.

 

 

I then asked that since we do not have bathroom to use what are suppose to do when nature calls, her reply was that we do need to use the toilet whilst works are being out! I was in such a shock that I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry. She further told me that should I need to use the toilet when the builders are working, I should go and ask the builder to use the toilet and the builders will let me know when I can use the toilet. I think at this point I ended the conversation as I had already spent the whole day on telephone with them.

 

I felt bullied, demean, degraded and at times felt I was being discriminated against. Surely no other customer is treated this way!

 

19, I put in a complaint straight away, which I was told would take so many weeks to be investigated, I had no choice but to sleep on an old sofa in the living and my autistic son also slept in another sofa downstairs. The discomfort was unbearable and was unable to sleep through the night. I received a letter from UK insurance in respect to the complaint with a cheque for £200 for the inconvenience. I thought what an insult, I contacted the complaint handler and insisted that he listen to the phone calls between myself and the claims handler.

 

20, On the 17th the builders started work and the house was a building site! Even the builders were shock to find us in the house and not an alternative accommodation. Eventually the builders and decorators finished by the 3rd May. The amount of dust and rubble was unbelievable. I spoke with the Nationwide and demanded a professional cleaning of the house. Rainbow international were sent to survey the cleaning on the 10th May. Rainbow international came on the 5th June to start cleaning the house and completed on 11th June. We then were able to move into the bedrooms and also to use the bathrooms. By now I have back ache from sleeping in the old uncomfortable sofa.

 

21, I was still haunted and in shock by the way I and my family had been treated and I was informed by a neighbour to contact the FOS. I am still suffering from back pain and treating it with heat patches

 

22, I received a call from UK Insurance complaint handler (let’s call her Vera) and she apologise for what had gone on. Vera informed me that Crawford will be sending me a cheque for £2160 for the disturbance caused.

Vera also told me the way the staff member spoke to me was unacceptable and feedback has been provided to prevent re occurrence.

 

23, I received a Cheque form UK Insurance for £2160 for disturbance, this cheque did not come from Crawford.

 

24, I called Vera and emailed her in respect my back pain, as I expect to be compensated for the pain I am suffering as a result of sleeping in the sofa for so long. Vera contacted me later and advise that since it was a personal injury I will therefore need to seek legal advice.

 

25, It is clear that the refusal to give us alternative accommodation was a dirty tactic used by Crawford and in doing so, have avoided paying the cost of accommodation which would have come to between £17000 - £25000!

 

26, I have written to Vera stating clearly that it is unfair and unjust for the Crawford/Insurance company should profit out of the unfair treatment we had received. Given that it would have cost them up to £25000 for the accommodation which we were rightly entitled to, therefore I seeking fair compensation from them and the £2160 isn’t fair amount.

 

Thank you all for reading this very long saga. I do wonder how many other families are going through this kind of treatment.

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome Fear no evil1,

 

I have moved this thread to the appropriate Forum, hopefully you will get some advice shortly.

 

Regards,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to exhaust the Company's complaints procedure after which time you can go to the Insurance Ombudsman

 

Have you dealt with this situation on the telephone or by letter ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have 8 weeks to resolve a complaint - if it is longer than that and there appears to be no resolution, then I would suggest you write one last letter - ensure they understand that this is a Formal Complaint (send to their Head office), give them say 14 days to resolve things to your satisfaction if not, then start escalating your complaint to the Insurance ombudsman.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The behaviour of Crawfords loss adjusters is not acceptable, but they are simply the agents of Nationwide, employed to adminster the claim in line with the policy t&c's and to minimise the cost of the claim. What should have happened is there should have been an assessment of how long the repairs were going to take and what period alternative accommodation would be required. It is normally the case that you would be offered Hotel or B&B type accommodation for as long as needed to properly assess the damage, for you to sort out the plumbing issue and for the home to be made as habitable as possible. If the damage to the house was severe and needed many months of work, the Insurers would have rented another house for you.

 

The problem is in regard to alternative accommodation as set out below, is what is considered habitable. For a home to be habitable, it would have to have running water for health and hygiene requirements (drinking, washing & toilet). It would have to have sufficient space for your family to be able to sleep. It would have to have facilities for your family to be able to eat. It would have to be safe to live in. If there were occupants with disabilities, then this should have been subject to an assessment by Crawfords on behalf of your Insurers, as they have responsibilities under a normal duty of care to work with you, to ensure their safety.

 

Normally in these situations, the Insurers won't pay for alternative accommodation, beyond the point where these points are catered for. As soon as the house was made safe with the asbestos risk removed, the plumbing issue resolved with running water restored and there were rooms in the house that could be occupied, you would be expected to move back in. Even if this meant that you were living in one or two undamaged rooms of the house, while restoration work was being done elsewhere in the house, this is normally seen as acceptable.

 

In my opinion you were not entitled to alternative accommodation to the value of £17k to £20k, but simply to accommodations costs where the house was not fit for habitation by your family, taking what I have said above. I would have expected this to be no more than a couple of months accommodation, if the claim and renovations had been handled properly.

 

What needs to be addressed, is the sloppy handling of this claim by Crawfords and any risks/inconvenience that they caused as a result. You need to work with Nationwide to come to a resolution and if you are not able to, then I would suggest that you speak to a Solicitor to see what they say. I think going to the FOS may not be worth it, as they will take months (or years) and I think this will just prolong this unncessarliy.

 

Buildings cover

4

Alternative accommodation and rent If your home is not fit to be lived in as a result of damage for which a valid claim covered under Section 1 of the policy has been made, or it is occupied by squatters, the insurer

will pay:

a) providing the property is yourmain residence, the necessary cost of comparable alternative accommodation for you and your pets while your home is being repaired or

b) if you rent out your property, the amount of rent you would have received but have lost as a result of it being unoccupied because of the damage

c) the cost of up to 2 years ground rent which you are legally responsible for.

 

Contents Cover

6

Alternative accommodation and storageProviding you live in the property and your home is not fit to be lived in as a result of a valid claim made under part A of Section 2 the insurer will pay:

a) the necessary cost of comparable accommodation for you and yourpets whilst your home is being repaired

b) the necessary cost of temporarily storing your contentswhile your home is being repaired.The insurer

will not pay more than 30% of the ontents sum insured in total for any alternative accommodation and storage costs.

Edited by unclebulgaria67

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all so much for your response. I accept that we may not be entitled to an accommodation of £17k-£20k.. I based the calculations on the nightly cost that was being paid when we were in the hotel. I believe they should have rented a place for us especially given the fact that it was going to take so long to get the house in order and habitable again.

 

It is the point blank refusal to help us at all and that really saddens me. The builders would leave their tools in the rooms and warn me of the dangers and to keep the kids away. It was a complete nightmare.

 

And the fact that I was told I should not have the need to use the toilet whist in the house was just beyond me. I shall be patient and work with the Nationwide on this matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

We have had a real proplem with Crawfords, the person who came to our house, was very aggressive towards me, theatend me and my pregnant wife, saying that we were lying and alsorts, Mr X from Crawfords was so bad towards us, we made a complant against him,

 

people beware of Mr X, he lied to us about police report, and other things

Edited by ims21
Link to post
Share on other sites

You should make a formal complaint to your Insurers. They are responsible for the actions of the loss adjusters.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
You should make a formal complaint to your Insurers. They are responsible for the actions of the loss adjusters.

 

Absolutely put your complaint in writing to your Insurers. Get them to listen to any recordings and I am sure they will investigate fully. I do find Crawford very unprofessional, but after I made the complaint to my insurance company (chief executive), I noticed a very big change in their attitude towards me. I would go as far as to say they showed respect towards me whenever we spoke although their service is absolutely appalling. Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...