Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Apologies dx100uk  I did not put the answers in red  Thank you all for your patience. H
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton  Name of the Claimant ? Overdales solicitors  How many defendant's  joint or self ?  Self Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.  13 may 2024 What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? the claim is for the sum of £6163.61due by the defendant under an agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 for hsbc uk bank plc. Account 4546384809766042. The defendant faild to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a default notice was served under s 87(1)  of the consumer credit act 1974 which as not been compiled with. The dbt was legally assigned to the Claimant on 23/08/23, notice on which as been given to the defendant.  The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £117.53 the Claimant claims the sum of £6281.14. Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?   Not to my knowledge. Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  No Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?  Online but it was for a smaller amount they kept on increasing this with me asking Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  It was assigned to a debt collection agency  Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? yes  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  Yes I also made offers to pay original creditor a smaller amount but was not replied to Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No Why did you cease payments? I was made redundant and got a less paid job I also spent some time on furlough during covid and spent some 3 months on ssp off work. What was the date of your last payment?  May 2021 Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes at the time I communicated with all my creditor's that I was running out of funds to pay the original agreements once my redundancy money ran out that was when my accounts defaulted. I then wrote to all my creditor's with pro rata offers of payments but debt collectors took over the accounts.
    • Just an update for all. I received about a letter every other week, increasing in threat levels. Then I hadn't had one for a about two weeks, then Saturday received a carbon copy of the very first letter they sent me in February. Made me laugh, rinse and repeat. 
    • So, your response was not received by the SCP as you did not send it with a valid stamp. Therefore, from my two option in post #14, the first option is the only one available to you, but you do not have the option of asking to be sentenced at the fixed penalty level as the reason the SCP did not receive your response was down to you. Here's a reminder of what to do: Respond to the SJPN by pleading “Not Guilty” to both charges. In the “Reasons for pleading Not Guilty” box state that you are willing to plead guilty to the speeding charge providing, and only providing, the “Fail to Provide Driver's Details" (FtP) charge is dropped. This is a tried and tested method to deal with your problem and is almost always successful. Before the pandemic it was necessary to attend court to do this "deal" because it needs the agreement of the police prosecutor.. During the pandemic courts made every effort to have as few  people as possible attend and they began doing this deal under the "Single Justice" procedure without the defendant's attendance. Some courts have carried this procedure on whilst others have reverted to a personal attendance being necessary. If you are required to attend, your case will be taken out of the SJ procedure and you will be given a date for a hearing in the normal Magistrates' Court. If that is the way they do it in the area involved you will have to attend, see the prosecutor and offer your "deal" in person. 
    • what device are you using? copy all the questions then come here to this thread and paste them. then answer each question click on red give answers here. when done  hit submit reply bottom right.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DWP - After death (benefit) reclaim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3943 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello there,

 

I have deep concern in regards to the DWP and what they're claiming I owe them from my late fathers estate, he unfortunately passed away 2 years ago of Motor Neurone Disease and left my mother with a few outstanding debts.

 

We sold a property prior to his death and the money was transferred to me in advance due to the fact his ability to eat, drink, think and communicate deteriated rapidly and it came to a point he could barely type on an ipad to speak so therefore did the best he could in offering me the money they had prior to his death.

 

Upon his death, I used the money to pay off existing debts outstanding upto about £35,000.00, once the debts were paid I then invested their money into a property which I and my sister now pay the rest of the mortgage on to give my mother a roof over her head and the final yet small amount of funds available went to the solicitor for doing absolutely nothing yet charging for it. The DWP although two years since my dads death are saying there was a period he was overpaid pension credit and we now owe them £5800(ish) pounds.

 

I have no doubt that we owe them this money because although he was dying and was entitled to pension credit, there was a point we had enough money to not claim the maximum amount entitled however due to ill health my father didn't change that and I wasn't aware that this would be the outcome.

 

My question is, is it possible to pay back half the outstanding balance and call it a day or will they basically demand the money in anyway shape or form, they've told me via telephone that I have a month, unless I can't pay up I have two years in which they want a lump sum (based on bank statements) The thing is I'm not executor, I'm just trying to stop my mum from suffering anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about this one.

 

I've dealt with a couple of these types of cases before, but in every case, the capital in the estate had been spent and the family member had no lump sum themselves, so I was able to make payment arrangements. I assume that as far as they see it, any capital you have is partly comprised of your father's estate, so they certainly have a case in court.

 

If you really don't have the lump sum to give, make a written offer of payment in manageable instalments providing proof of your current capital and income, showing what you can and can't afford.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about this one.

 

I've dealt with a couple of these types of cases before, but in every case, the capital in the estate had been spent and the family member had no lump sum themselves, so I was able to make payment arrangements. I assume that as far as they see it, any capital you have is partly comprised of your father's estate, so they certainly have a case in court.

 

If you really don't have the lump sum to give, make a written offer of payment in manageable instalments providing proof of your current capital and income, showing what you can and can't afford.

 

Thanks for your help, Well we have a house off of the back of the estate which is my mothers irrespective of who's paying the mortgage, I just want it over with, we genuinely weren't trying to dodge anything or be clever, I was just a 25 year old who'd never faced this type of responsibility before in my entire life, a solicitor we overpaid to sincerely do absolutely nothing but forward bank states to the DWP and charge the earth for it over 18 months. We were given the grant of probate and I was advised by the solicitor we can do as we wish with the estate to then be told 4 months later that the DWP are questioning my fathers pension credit.

 

I have some money (that will cover the majority of the outstanding) I'd personally saved myself however I'll just have to sacrifice it for the over payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, there really isn't any way around it. I would suggest you write offering an instalment plan first before sacrificing your savings. But yes, it's a very difficult thing to happen - the family lose someone very dear, have to deal with everything that goes with that, think everything is sorted and treat any inheritance accordingly, and then find out there is a DWP overpayment - I really do feel for you and your family.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

the DWP always do this,they call it protecting public funds, when my father died six years ago now,there was a bit of a run on with his pension credit which I didnt know about,when I cleared his bank accounts I just distributed the money between my two sisters and brother,I didnt give myself anything,couple a months later they sent me a bill,I had to pay back the money I had distributed,thats the way they are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about this one.

 

I've dealt with a couple of these types of cases before, but in every case, the capital in the estate had been spent and the family member had no lump sum themselves, so I was able to make payment arrangements. .

 

If an estate has no assets but has debts - those debts die with the deceased unless they were joint ones.

 

Not quite sure what you are saying - the family had the deceased money, spent it and then had to repay the DWP?? Yes quite correct - the question I would want to ask is who was the Executor/Administrator??? Whoever it was made a hash of it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help, Well we have a house off of the back of the estate which is my mothers irrespective of who's paying the mortgage, I just want it over with, we genuinely weren't trying to dodge anything or be clever, I was just a 25 year old who'd never faced this type of responsibility before in my entire life, a solicitor we overpaid to sincerely do absolutely nothing but forward bank states to the DWP and charge the earth for it over 18 months. We were given the grant of probate and I was advised by the solicitor we can do as we wish with the estate to then be told 4 months later that the DWP are questioning my fathers pension credit.

 

I have some money (that will cover the majority of the outstanding) I'd personally saved myself however I'll just have to sacrifice it for the over payment.

 

Sue the solicitor!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help, Well we have a house off of the back of the estate which is my mothers irrespective of who's paying the mortgage, I just want it over with, we genuinely weren't trying to dodge anything or be clever, I was just a 25 year old who'd never faced this type of responsibility before in my entire life, a solicitor we overpaid to sincerely do absolutely nothing but forward bank states to the DWP and charge the earth for it over 18 months. We were given the grant of probate and I was advised by the solicitor we can do as we wish with the estate to then be told 4 months later that the DWP are questioning my fathers pension credit.

 

I have some money (that will cover the majority of the outstanding) I'd personally saved myself however I'll just have to sacrifice it for the over payment.

 

The process is that the Administrator/Executor first of all pays HMRC any Inheritance Tax due, then gathers all of the funds of the estate, writes to all known and possible creditors including the DWP, places an ad in two newspapers including one national one/London Gazette advising of a date by which the estate will be finalised and distributed and for anybody that is owed money by the deceased to contact the Administrator/Executor by that date with proof of that debt. Once that date is passed, the estate settles all known debts and any balance left over goes to the beneficiaries.

 

I can't see why the DWP are now coming back for the money unless someone failed to contact them shortly after death and/or they didn't advertise for final proofs.

 

Secondly I can't see how it was possible for the beneficiaries to have the money without going through the process.

 

If a solicitor was acting - then that is a case for complaint and compensation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well we have a house off of the back of the estate which is my mothers irrespective of who's paying the mortgage, I have some money (that will cover the majority of the outstanding) I'd personally saved myself however I'll just have to sacrifice it for the over payment.

 

I do hope that you disclosed the property sale just prior to death to HMRC? It could be seen as attempting to reduce the value of the estate to avoid either paying the estate's debts or tax.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do hope that you disclosed the property sale just prior to death to HMRC? It could be seen as attempting to reduce the value of the estate to avoid either paying the estate's debts or tax.

 

The property we purchased was bought 9 months after the death, the sale of the previous property was declared within the estate to HMRC.

 

The solicitor was unfortunately executor and my mother was the sole beneficiary of the estate.

 

No tax was avoided, unfortunately my fathers ability to not communicate left us within a period of claiming too much pension credit. I'm just going to pay the majority anyway and install the rest over 4 months (if they accept it)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If an estate has no assets but has debts - those debts die with the deceased unless they were joint ones.

 

Not quite sure what you are saying - the family had the deceased money, spent it and then had to repay the DWP?? Yes quite correct - the question I would want to ask is who was the Executor/Administrator??? Whoever it was made a hash of it!!

 

What I wasn't sure about was the action the DWP could take against the estate if the full amount wasn't offered - not my area, and not a situation I've come across. I was suggesting that a payment plan might be acceptable, in the circumstances if reasonable and put in writing.

 

These circumstances often occur in the real world - you know, not the nice neat one of your imaginings - how many times on this board do people post that the DWP is coming after them for an overpayment just now discovered, but from a few years before. This is what happens if the person who incurred the overpayment dies and their estate settled and distributed prior to the DWP discovery of the overpayment.

 

The estate had assets, therefore the beneficiaries are liable for the debt

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I wasn't sure about was the action the DWP could take against the estate if the full amount wasn't offered - not my area, and not a situation I've come across. I was suggesting that a payment plan might be acceptable, in the circumstances if reasonable and put in writing.

 

These circumstances often occur in the real world - you know, not the nice neat one of your imaginings - how many times on this board do people post that the DWP is coming after them for an overpayment just now discovered, but from a few years before. This is what happens if the person who incurred the overpayment dies and their estate settled and distributed prior to the DWP discovery of the overpayment.

 

The estate had assets, therefore the beneficiaries are liable for the debt

 

I find it impossible to accept that if the estate was wound up in the correct manner, notice would have been lodged in at least two public newspapers including the London Gazette that any creditor that did not lodge a proof of debt by the given date, they would lose all right to have their claim admitted into the estate.

 

Simply that they left it far too late to ask for the money to be repaid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would refer the DWP to the executor/solicitor as the responsibility of winding up the estate lies squarely with them, and any executor/solicitor worth their salt should have made sure the DWP was included in the list of possible creditors, particularly as your father was suffering from a condition which would give entitlement to more benefits x

scotgal 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How many times do I need to explain this ?? I'll try to make it clearer.

 

Overpayments caused by a claimant not notifying them of something, for instance savings, income, any change of circumstances are not immediately obvious to the DWP - they are not psychic. On winding up the claim on a person's death, they don't suddenly have awareness of all the things a claimant forgot to tell them about during the life of the claim. These things will often become apparent at a later date, for instance due to data matching, HMRC info, etc etc.

 

On closing a claim there isn't an intensive search to check if Mr Bloggs forgot to tell them something, was dishonest in his claim or downright fraudulent. Use common sense - these things come to light later (or sometimes never) and are unfortunate for those left behind, but the reality is that in these circumstances the DWP has every right to collect the money from any capital that was left in the estate. In some cases the overpayment would be due to a mistake on the part of the claimant or family, in others it will be due to fraudulent activity. In either case it was state funds, and the DWP WILL and can reclaim it.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...