Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Shop Direct Debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

SAR 40 days if beyond that then complaint to ICO.

 

Shop Direct if you pay like I do £1.00 or so per month may accept, all I have seen is non payment then account sold off then action by a Debt buyer possible court route ( if the amount is worthwhile chasing), sure others will advise.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

did not I just keep paying that amount, they will not talk about it via e-mail, NDR are shop direct anyway. I also run a spreadsheet on charges so that one day the amount matches what they reckon I owe them. in fact the CRA Noddle shows account not in default, so I let sleeping dogs lie for now.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

How long have you been doing that for, Mike770? I'll just keep paying and see what happens. Surely that'll go in my favour if they do take it further. I noticed that the default does say that they MAY take further action, not WILL.

 

It's somewhat comforting to know that I'm not alone in my problems with Shop Direct.

Edited by The_Sherinator
Link to post
Share on other sites

How long have you been doing that for, Mike770? I'll just keep paying and see what happens. Surely that'll go in my favour if they do take it further. I noticed that the default does say that they MAY take further action, not WILL.

 

It's somewhat comforting to know that I'm not alone in my problems with Shop Direct.

 

 

as I see it you are showing a willingness to pay to an extent, suppose it depends on the alledged amount you owe them>?

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

go to the ICO site and fill in their complaints template and send it straight away, that is what I did regarding another company.

 

get those charges reclaimed if they match the amount owed, using the 39.9% + the £10.00 SAR charge from date of request.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm hoping and I'm 99% sure that reclaiming the charges will reduce the debt considerably!

 

Although, couldn't they say that the charges are fair and block any reclaim?

 

I've been getting chest pains due to the stress of this and their unwillingness to listen.

Edited by The_Sherinator
Link to post
Share on other sites

If they try and say the charges of fair, they have to prove it. SInce they are very obviously penalty charges, it would be impossible for them to do so.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi,

 

Need some help ASAP.

 

I have received my usual summary from Shop Direct and it has all the latest payment of £1 on it.

 

Inside is another letter,

 

a 'Notice Of Sums In Arrears' stating that I have failed to make the payments!

 

What the heck is going on?

 

This is for the account that they mysteriously defaulted but not the others.

 

Oh and they've added on £44 in missed payment charges from last month to this month!

 

What do I do now. I'm still waiting on a response from my SAR.

 

I know I've paid the £1 per account and can prove it, so what should I do!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing whats so urgent about that?

 

you are supposed to pay them the stated monthly figure on the statement

 

you are not

so they have levied their usual unlawful PENALTY fee of £12

 

the notice [NOSIN] letter is what they must send if they levy a PENALTY charge

 

just add them to the reclaiming spreadsheet

you are going to do

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the default is made up of charges or because of those charges they added a default, then yes. It can be challenged.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

reclaim THEN address the default issues.

 

only if the Default Notice 14 day figure contained PENALTY charges

or was SOLELY their charges can it be asked to be removed.

 

same goes for markers

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

 

I have finally received the SAR request from Shop Direct today.

 

I have to say, I expected it to be bigger, it's fit into a standard A4 window envelope.

 

It does not contain most of the things I requested in the SAR.

 

I have a few pages of screenshots,

which don't seem to date back to the entire history of the account

but do show some letter fees (£12 per letter) and late £12 charges.

 

There are also some printouts of what I'm assuming must be excel spreadsheets pasted into Word

and not set to landscape and not aligned. I can't make heads or tails of it.

 

There are no statements,

no CCAs,

no transcripts of telephone conversations,

no default notices and so forth.

 

It also says, at the bottom of the letter,

 

"Full details on how we use your data and who it is passed to is contained

within the data protection policy pages in our catalogue."

 

Basically, look it up yourself.

 

What are the next steps? They haven't followed up properly. Is there a letter to send back?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is the 40days up

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, a while ago.

 

I received a letter early February which thanked me for the SAR request

and they were gathering the information.

 

I've just received the very little bit of information today and

 

I sent a letter on 13th December reminding them.

 

It's been 66 days since then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

having had sars from them before the info will be in the logs

 

you wont get calls more recent than 3mts transcripted, if at all

you certainly wont, or rarely get a DN copy.

 

can you scan up

barring the rubbish which is not 'data

 

what you have got?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Did we ever find out what happened with this case?

 

Kinda entering in to a similar situation with NDR/Shop Direct and this has been a good read.

 

 

They are threatening me with a default on my account.

 

 

That doesn't worry me in the slightest in all honesty, as this is my mess and I have to deal with it.

 

What worries me is how they go about getting the debt back?

 

 

I am just paying them £100 each month at the moment but they are still not listening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...