Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
    • Frankly I think you should go to a hearing unless you feel especially nervous . If you have any worries then you should follow our link to find out about a county court familiarisation visit     You shouldn't forget that county Court judgements are very helpful but they are not binding. They are only persuasive.  It is difficult to see you losing but it might be better to be there in order to counter any arguments from the other side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

baliff took our retail stock in storage worth 20k and sold it at auction for £1725


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3971 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

can anybody help.. we had a issue a storage company who the instructed baliffs to remove our retail stock and sold it at auction.. we did not know anything about this until afterwards

 

they took 200 items item worth approx 20k and sold it for next to nothing at 1725..

 

what can we do as we have been ripped off beyond belief for a debt of £625..

 

we didnt receive a penny as the baliffs took the remaining balance for themselves

myself and my wife are feeling physically sick by this and has left us with no stock and a huge problem trying to replace it .

 

can anybody help.. the baliffs concerned were some frim called Guants in bradford who we have contacted and found them rude annd agressive and they simply hung up the call.

 

 

any help would be greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without providing any personal information could you provide a bit more information about the background to this debt and when the bailiff visited etc.

 

Was the debt owed by you personally or as a Limited Company.

 

Was the stock owned by the person who owed the debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this was a storage locker, I believe the storage yard have a right to sell goods when arrears arise from storage lockers, However I believe this is subject to serving notice under tort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once a writ is issued the HCEO is commanded to seize and sell the judgment debtors goods (if payment is not made) wherever they may be found. Clearly if the goods were located in the creditors premises then the HCEO would have no problem finding them, seizing them and subsequently selling them.

 

There are strict rules about the method of sale and these must be adhered to or the HCEO may face legal action. The goods must be sold by public auction or by private treaty if a court so allows.

 

Whilst you may value your goods at £20,000 it is not unreasonable to expect a quarter of that at auction, much less if provenience, documents or other factors that may have aided value are missing. Then the auctioneer will take their own commissions and storage costs from this. Add to this the HCEOs fees and removal costs and all of a sudden it's easy to see why the sums realised may be so little.

 

A starting point would be to ask for a breakdown of the sale prices.

Edited by HCEOs
Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest that you obtain proper legal advice on this to see what remedies are open to you. There may be a Solicitor locally who has knowledge of such issues who can at least provide a consultation as to whether they can follow this up or whether the costs/risks may outweigh any amount you could recover.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

thanksy guys,extra info for you you are correct as above hceo seized the goods fro mthe container storage unit and sent them to auction in stcokport.. at no point was i informed or was i sent any details.i recieved 7 months later a breakdown of of sols items. it doesnt identify each item ,as they gave some away as packs of 5 etc they sold the hole lot for 1750 ,there was genuinely 15 at cost and sold for fivers and tenners even thouch each item cost 100-199,..i feel totally ripped off and feel ive had the guts ripped out of me.. the nasty baliffs were gaunts from bradford.i dont know what to do..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you actually own the goods seized or were any still unpaid for and technically remained the property of the supplier?

 

My reason for asking is ....you should have been advised at the time of seizure what goods were listed, thereby giving you the opportubity to contact the 'owner' and allow a third party claim at interpleader.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you actually own the goods seized or were any still unpaid for and technically remained the property of the supplier?

 

My reason for asking is ....you should have been advised at the time of seizure what goods were listed, thereby giving you the opportubity to contact the 'owner' and allow a third party claim at interpleader.

 

in response: i owned all the items all paid for for...the bill i owed was £675.. the next thing i know ive got a ccj and was never told anything.. i found out 5 months later when i forced gaunts to provide an incomprtant list with scribbled auction prices at £10-15 FOR ITEM that cost 90-150 plus vat etc. gaunts were rude and evasive with information.. all i know know they took every last peeny in fees and charges of £1100.cno breakdown just sheer ignorance on their behalf.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WD has OP any mileage in the incomplete listing, and the method of sale?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

BN....there is not enough info on the thread to allow me to draw a conclusion but, based on what has been posted I would say that Gaunts did not execute the writ correctly. what I am reading tells me there is a strong possibility they can be held to account.

 

It is not something that should be done on open forum as there will be a lot of sensitive info required but if the OP is prepared to give that info I will be happy to take a closer look.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

BN....there is not enough info on the thread to allow me to draw a conclusion but, based on what has been posted I would say that Gaunts did not execute the writ correctly. what I am reading tells me there is a strong possibility they can be held to account.

 

It is not something that should be done on open forum as there will be a lot of sensitive info required but if the OP is prepared to give that info I will be happy to take a closer look.

 

WD

 

If OP is willing and site admins are Ok with it, I feel they should progress this with a PM of the info to yourself, as this is best kept off open forum for the time being, don't want Gaunts to be given any inkling of what they may get hit with. I feel they have botched the enforcement but defer to those who have more knowledge.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whether or not the Writ was executed correctly will be for others to determine but I would remind the OP of my early post regarding the value of the goods when sold at public auction. The prices quoted as realised in the sale are quite plausible in the current market.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whether or not the Writ was executed correctly will be for others to determine but I would remind the OP of my early post regarding the value of the goods when sold at public auction. The prices quoted as realised in the sale are quite plausible in the current market.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

you think 10-15 for a item that costs 100-200 is ok?

 

i owned all the items as im a sole trader business..

 

the storage yard offered me a discount at one point in settlement then locked my container and refused to let me in at all.. hence we couldnt supply any goods and couldnt bring in any funds.. we asked several times if we can get 1-15 items out as they were sold. the container people refused.

 

they put a double bolted lock in on the unit so had no chance of getting in.

 

i then find out guants have emptied the unit, sold it all at auction and i never knew a thing about it until 5-6 months later. gaunts sent me a list of items sold but it was shabolic list you can barely read. all i can see is 10-15 etc

 

total sale 1765 approx.. gaunts simply took the rest in the fees without sending.. no exucses as i lived at the same address for 13 years. at no point did gaunts contact me they just took everything.

 

private message me if you want more details etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure where i stand but 15k of stock plus vat all paid for taken by guants..all brand new and some items from what i remember cost upwards of 350 plus vat. all they had to let us do was delivery 5-10 mirrors and pay the container bill..

 

im feeling physically sick and unwell and face loosing my business as the stock was key to our cash flow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i havent done a subject to access request but i will do one and see what they send me ...

 

the issue is i would have bought the items back but had no knowledge of the auction at all.. i in fact never had any communication at all /nor did i receive the residual funds gaunts said they were going to send me as little as they may have been.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to seek professional legal advice on the matter.

 

Gaunts really haven't done that much wrong. They have seized and removed items and sold them at public auction (to which they have no control over the selling price) as commanded by the writ issued by the Court and directed to the HCEO.

 

The question you should be asking is why you never received the claim form. The process would have taken well over a month to get the HCEO stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you think 10-15 for a item that costs 100-200 is ok?

 

I understand your frustration but it's not a question of it being OK it's just a fact that auction values are very poor at the moment. It would help if I understood what type of goods you're referring to as some fair better than others at a public auction. For instance, untested electrical goods will often sell for very very little.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what happens if gaunts cant provide any paperwork etc? im at a total loss here, everyweek that goes by is another nail in my coffin so to speak.its going to ruin me hand over fist.. items concerned were decorative mirrors uk hand made and expensive too..150-300 at cost gaunts gave there director mobile number but frankly the guy was most unhelpful..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid you will need to contact the HCEO or the Auctioneer regarding the paperwork but I will say that items such as those you describe will rarely fetch anything like the value you put on them at a public auction unfortunately. They will have been sold to the highest bidder on the day and to that end I cannot see that the HCEO has done anything wrong regarding the conduct of the sale.

 

If you believe otherwise it would be best to seek independent legal advice from s Solicitor. I'm sorry I can't be of more help.

Edited by HCEOs
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...