Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lowell chasing Lloyds 2007 CC debt - **agreed SB**


pigginpie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3674 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

yes that was updated

 

 

So the default date shown on the Lowell entry is still 2008??

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes sorry , just realised 1st of march 2008

That's fine then, but I would have loved to have caught Lowell out on something like this.!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Default date does not indicate statute barred a debt may or may not be SB because of payments in the six year period.

The default entry will be removed on the anniversary of the default date when we see that gone we can work on the SB status.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't worry about that carter letter

 

my neighbour had loads of those

 

PERS I never advise replied to any of them over 8 debts

 

they never went anywhere.

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fine then, but I would have loved to have caught Lowell out on something like this.!!

 

You and me both! What a shame...... :Cry:

 

so with regards to bryan carters solicitors giving me 14 days to pay before legal proceedings do i just ignore them ?

 

Pretty much yes, you'll only encourage him, besides his 14 days is purely a con and arbitrary he is trying to force you into a reaction and hoping to reset the limitation period.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

fat chance!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So will i end up eventually going court over this debt , pretty clueless when it comes to these kind of things

 

Yep, two hopes there, and one of those is bob!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would i be right in thinking if it was clear cut i would of been in court well before now

Almost certainly!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowlifes :sigh:

 

Brig and co... are we sure this wont go to court?

BC and Lowell have a tendency to push these before the Statute Barred date...

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowlifes :sigh:

 

Brig and co... are we sure this wont go to court?

BC and Lowell have a tendency to push these before the Statute Barred date...

My feelings is action would have started much earlier.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi guys made a mistake with the dates ,

 

just looked on my credit file default date on the tsb entry 28/3/2008 then lowells have the default date at 1/4/2008 ,

 

seems bryan carter will have a extra month to do what he is going to do there for is not running out of time like i 1st thought and hoped , starting to get a bad feeling

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then the default date is incorrect and the CRA are reporting inaccurate data, which if you wanted to, you could sue them for.

 

You're really reading far too much into these silly little missives they spit out.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Boo, that scenario will not work I'm afraid the CRAs have a protection in that they are supplied with the data that their client confirms is correct, the liability for causing inaccurate data to be displayed fall upon the company supplying it. only if a CRA fails to correct data that is proven to be inaccurate may claim possibly succeed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys

 

recieved a letter of fredricksons today

stating that despite a recent letter from bryan carter

it appears you have still not discharged your debt with our client lowell financial ,

 

we are prepared to offer you one final opportunity to pay

before recommending to our client that they instruct solicitors to issue a claim at my address ,

 

at this late stage and as a gesture of goodwill we are prepared to accept a full and final settlement on this account

provided that you contact us on 08453136614 within 48 hrs of receipt of this letter ,

 

then the letter goes on about lowells will amend the credit file to show part payment as been made

and it will help me to obtain credit etc.

 

is this a letter before action

 

is it time to send the cca request

 

any advise please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah well their GOGW is a con, any F&F payment should only be made in the understanding that they mark the account as satisfied/settled, NOT as part payment!

You won't make your position any better if you pay this F&F on their terms.

 

If it was a LBA then it should state as such.

What account is this for? A credit card?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is commonly known that a part settlement will not work with you but against you in your credit rating...

 

I think you should submit that to the OFT.

With a cover note saying there is no proof to what they are saying.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah well their GOGW is a con, any F&F payment should only be made in the understanding that they mark the account as satisfied/settled, NOT as part payment!

You won't make your position any better if you pay this F&F on their terms.

 

If it was a LBA then it should state as such.

What account is this for? A credit card?

yes it was a credit card starting to feel stressed now , any advise on what i should do now thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan it up...

 

think I've got 4 copies of that letter my neighbour got last year

never goes anywhere

 

its gonna drop off next month anyhow

and it prob already statute barred

and with no CCA

 

lemon debt

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...