Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lowell chasing Lloyds 2007 CC debt - **agreed SB**


pigginpie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3665 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Personally I would follow2 dx advice Lowell have become very persistent of late and issue SDs requently.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Personally I would follow2 dx advice Lowell have become very persistent of late and issue SDs requently.

 

sorry to come across dumb but what is an SD

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to come across dumb but what is an SD

 

Statutory demand

 

A statutory demand can be used to ask for payment of a debt from an individual or company.

 

When an individual or company gets a statutory demand, they have 21 days to either:

Settle the debt or reach an agreement to pay.

If there’s no agreement, whoever issues the statutory demand can start proceedings to recover the debt.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

the last time i acknowledged the debt was april 2007 with the tsb bank , but the credit report says lowells april 2008 im confused ere , cause i have never spoke with lowells will the debt be statue barred and therefore no legal action can take place , im starting to feel really ill with the worry , sorry for seeming repetative

 

paull

Link to post
Share on other sites

Acknowledgment of a debt is ''an unequivocal WRITTEN ACKNOWLEDGMENT THAT THE LIABILITY SUBSISTS''. Phone conversations do not count.

What exactly does the entry say re Lowell in April 2008 also what is the default date shown?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Acknowledgment of a debt is ''an unequivocal WRITTEN ACKNOWLEDGMENT THAT THE LIABILITY SUBSISTS''. Phone conversations do not count.

What exactly does the entry say re Lowell in April 2008 also what is the default date shown?

 

it just says lowell was the lender date of default as 1 / 4 / 2008 , then theres like a calander what as a red D for default on every month from the 2008 date , i believe this is wrong cause it was lloyds tsb the lender not lowells ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowells bought the debt. You claim last ack of the debt was apr 2007? If so, send them the Statute barred letter and put them to proof that the debt is still enforceable.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

it just says lowell was the lender date of default as 1 / 4 / 2008 , then theres like a calander what as a red D for default on every month from the 2008 date , i believe this is wrong cause it was lloyds tsb the lender not lowells ?

Di NOT send anything anywhere yet, is this the date Lowell acquired this account?

 

Was the debt defaulted by the original creditor Lloyds?

 

It has been known for DCAs to claim the default starts when they but the debt but this is wrong!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowells bought the debt. You claim last ack of the debt was apr 2007? If so, send them the Statute barred letter and put them to proof that the debt is still enforceable.

 

can i do this over the phone or via email

Link to post
Share on other sites

lowlife has brought the debt

 

when this happens

their name will replace that of the OC

 

in this case Lloyds.

 

so Lloyds would have defaulted you

lowlife just followed suite.

 

as stated

if your last written ack or in/out transaction was apr 2007 the debt is SB'd

 

send them the SB letter

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Di NOT send anything anywhere yet, is this the date Lowell acquired this account?

 

Was the debt defaulted by the original creditor Lloyds?

 

It has been known for DCAs to claim the default starts when they but the debt but this is wrong!

 

yes this is the date lowell took / bought the debt there is no default on there from lloyds tsb , is this maybe cause the 6 years as past

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are going to send a statute barred letter to Lowell use this and send by RM recorded delivery.

 

The Compliance Manager

Lowell Group

Enterprise House

1 Apex View

Leeds

LS11 9BH

 

Ref: use theirs.

 

Sir,

 

I refer to recent correspondence regarding an alleged debt for £xxxx .xx originating from an account with Lloyds, please not I do not acknowledge any debt to Lowell.

 

I have concluded that any such alleged debt is statute barred therefore I will not make any payment

 

I would remind Lowell that if it should deny the status of the alleged debt I would remind you that the onus of providing unequivocal proof that the debt is NOT statute barred lies entirely on Lowell.

 

Lowell will now confirm in writing that it has closed the file on this account and has removed all adverse data reported to credit reference agencies.

 

I have also noted that the default date place by Lowell is inaccurate and I expect Lowell to correct it prior to removing the data from the files.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes this is the date lowell took / bought the debt there is no default on there from lloyds tsb , is this maybe cause the 6 years as past

Just what I thought Lowell has altered the date to when they acquired the debt, have drafted a letter for you send it by recorded delivery.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

well spotted brig

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well spotted brig

 

dx

Fresh in my mind dx 2 similar seen ''elsewhere'' during last week!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are going to send a statute barred letter to Lowell use this and send by RM recorded delivery.

 

The Compliance Manager

Lowell Group

Enterprise House

1 Apex View

Leeds

LS11 9BH

 

Ref: use theirs.

 

Sir,

 

I refer to recent correspondence regarding an alleged debt for £xxxx .xx originating from an account with Lloyds, please not I do not acknowledge any debt to Lowell.

 

I have concluded that any such alleged debt is statute barred therefore I will not make any payment

 

I would remind Lowell that if it should deny the status of the alleged debt I would remind you that the onus of providing unequivocal proof that the debt is NOT statute barred lies entirely on Lowell.

 

Lowell will now confirm in writing that it has closed the file on this account and has removed all adverse data reported to credit reference agencies.

 

I have also noted that the default date place by Lowell is inaccurate and I expect Lowell to correct it prior to removing the data from the files.

 

Thanks very much starting to feel better already , am i right in thinking they cant SD a statute barred debt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much starting to feel better already , am i right in thinking they cant SD a statute barred debt

 

Statute Barred means the debt cannot be enforced by judgement in court nor can they start bankruptcy proceedings !!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

just like to ad your guys are doing a great job helping total strangers out in your own free time

Thank you I am sure everyone appreciates your thanks!!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi guys back again with new info i found on a different credit report , it says a satisfied account then on 30/9/2012 it states debt assigned , also it turns out my last payment on the debt was august 2007 then for 6 months states account in arrears then it is defaulted in march 2008 , does the 6 years start from the last payment or when the account as defaulted

Link to post
Share on other sites

last payment.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

last payment for statute barred, the default will remain on file until its 6 year life expires, as stat barred means that the debt cannot be enforced in court but in England and Wales it still exists and remains payable until the letter I have drafted is received by Lowell.

So get the letter off when that has been dealt with we can try to get the default removed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

last payment for statute barred, the default will remain on file until its 6 year life expires, as stat barred means that the debt cannot be enforced in court but in England and Wales it still exists and remains payable until the letter I have drafted is received by Lowell.

So get the letter off when that has been dealt with we can try to get the default removed.

 

so i can send that letter now even thou my last payment was august 2007 , sorry for the confusion

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry my fault I thought is was Feb 2007 :-x

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...