Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  So brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details so first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it ,this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025 so slightly longer than the original tax set up so all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. So I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled so I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
    • That doesn't look like clacton ... Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage buys coastal home in Lydd-on-Sea WWW.KENTONLINE.CO.UK Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage bought a coastal home in the county, it has been reported.  
    • It's not a private road.  It's a small public street (with Resi houses) that leads into and from public road/ highway. The garages have land in front of the doors.  Then there's a yellow line. So there's a clear marker on what is private and what is public.  These people keep parking on the private land side
    • Do you also own land the garages on and the private road? Or is it shared freehold with right of access to all freeholders or why?  Dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Jacobs certificated Bailiffs and debt collector's **Taken back by Council**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4058 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

can someone tell me before I write this e-mail if the National standards apply to Jacobs when collecting rent arrears' I don't think/know if my DIL has been taken to court for the arrears'

 

It not until you see first hand someone who truly is a vulnerable a debtor go to bits when told Jacobs will be paying a visit (as debt collector's in case I think) that you understand how bad it can affect them

 

To say im :-xis an understatement

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm surprised that they are using a bailiff/debt collector I've not known it before, I would suspect they would be covered (if not chasing court debts) by debt collecting, but I'm not 100%

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The statutory regulations regarding the certification of bailiffs may be found in the Distress for Rent Rules 1988 and the applicable fee scale in relation to the collection of rent arrears may also be found in the same regs.

 

Most certificated bailiffs enforce debts on behalf of a government agency (council tax and parking charge notices) and others enforce unpaid rent arrears. All of them will be certificated under the Distress for Rent Rules 1988 and accordingly, they must all abide by the National Standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They must abide by the NSEA. There can be no doubt.

 

 

TT Thanks for that

 

I know Jacobs read these threads so just to let them know the wee welsh lassie that phoned you today and explained the reason she had missed 2 payment was because she is dying of cancer and has spent the last 6 months going through her 2nd round of chemo (end of life treatment)

 

after what you said to her today I am totally and utterly disgusted you have sunk to a whole new level today

Link to post
Share on other sites

TT Thanks for that

 

I know Jacobs read these threads so just to let them know the wee welsh lassie that phoned you today and explained the reason she had missed 2 payment was because she is dying of cancer and has spent the last 6 months going through her 2nd round of chemo (end of life treatment)

 

after what you said to her today I am totally and utterly disgusted you have sunk to a whole new level today

 

 

Hallow nothing can describe the horror and absolute disgust and contempt I feel for Jacobs after this post, they are the lowest of the low. They need a compulsory winding up notice, they are beyond contempt

What nastiness did they spout this time, we don't care, pay up we will clear the house etc etc, or worse?

Nothing surprises me about that heartless bunch of cretins at Jacobs, they are the sort who would levy and clamp a paramedic ambulance attending a debtors house after they collapsed as a result of their bailiffs behaviour. Clamping third party and random motors is their usual Modus Operandi.:-x:-x

Edited by brassnecked
blowing my top at Jacobs inhumanity and heartlessness ignoring vulnerability

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

These employees need exposing. They need photographing perhaps when leaving the pig pen where they work and then plastering their pictures all over the internet. Sick individuals working for mentally ill companies. Let's face it, no one in their right mind would try and put pressure on a terminally ill person. Like I've mentioned before, I am seriously considering a name and shame Bailiff Web site and having it administered abroad.

 

I encourage everyone hassled by Bailiff firms and or DCAs to record all telephone calls. You only need to reply to one letter and have small print at the bottom of it stating calls to you home / mobile may be monitored for training and security purposes. - play these criminals at their own game.

The Banksta Buster.

:-x :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hallow if there is anything we can do to help, you have our support,

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hallowitch.

 

The complaint appears to be very serious indeed and given the exceptional circumstances I would suggest that it is referred to their Senior Partner; Mr Simon Jacobs.

 

Given that Simon Jacobs was the previous President of CIVEA he would be the best person to address such a complaint.

 

In the morning I will let you have his contact details ( email address).

Edited by tomtubby
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hallowitch.

 

The complaint appears to be very serious indeed and given the exceptional circumstances I would suggest that the complaint should be referred to the Senior Partner; Mr Simon Jacobs.

 

In the morning I will let you have his contact details ( email address).

 

Thanks for that I most certainly will be making a complaint to him I sent the head of revenues an e-mail about an hour ago and believe it or not I've had reply from him

 

she said to me I couldn't believe they way they were speaking to me I missed 2 payment I told them why they said you have my sympathy and then they threatened me with assorts they are to come to the house taking me to court and you should have heard how they were speaking to me really nasty (her words)

 

 

about 6 weeks ago my daughter in-law finished he second round of chemo (we were devastated when we found out the treatment she had last year didn't work ) this second treatment that she has is new approved November last year and the side effects can be pretty bad (she is just getting over a collapsed lung) then she went for a scan to see if the treatment had started to work this time , then she had and wait on her results that's why paying Jacobs was the last thing on her mind

 

Quite frankly im surprised she is only 2 payments behind she has paid almost half the debt its not as if she is avoiding it

 

its about time ALL local authority's stopped there bailiff using manual payment method as the rule rather than the exception in this day and age

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the revised National Standards were announced last year, there was a Press Release from the (previous) Justice Minister which stated that MOJ expect all LOCAL AUTHORITIES to also abide by the NSEA. I will dig out a copy in the morning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget to copy your MP and AM into the complaint, along with the local member for your DIL Jacobs must be called to account for this heartless treatment of someone who is genuinely vulnerable.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let you know the debt has been returned to the council

 

A big thanks to the head of revenues of my council Jacobs have been informed not to contact my DIL again under any circumstance's and she has been given a number to phone if they do get in touch with her

 

I believe Jacobs had to send a fax/e-mail to my council to put it in writing that they will not contact her again

 

TT thanks for the PM will be in touch soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm glad the council saw sense Hallow, and you and DIL can rest easier now, looks like Wrexham Council care after all. hope they think twice when someone complains about their contracted bailiffs in future.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would seem that common sense has prevailed at WREXHAM COUNCIL and well done to them !!!

 

You and your family must be going through a most dreadful time at the moment and I do hope that your daughter in law makes a speedy recovery. A big hug from me to you all xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

These employees need exposing. They need photographing perhaps when leaving the pig pen where they work and then plastering their pictures all over the internet. Sick individuals working for mentally ill companies. Let's face it, no one in their right mind would try and put pressure on a terminally ill person. Like I've mentioned before, I am seriously considering a name and shame Bailiff Web site and having it administered abroad.

 

I encourage everyone hassled by Bailiff firms and or DCAs to record all telephone calls. You only need to reply to one letter and have small print at the bottom of it stating calls to you home / mobile may be monitored for training and security purposes. - play these criminals at their own game.

 

I too have had trouble from Jacobs, they seem to think that they are above the law and immune to legislation re vulnerable clients, can't we take them on? form an action group?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...