Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I thought the LibDems were going to table a motion of no confidence? I haven't heard anything about it for a couple of days.
    • Sorry for late reply dx been away and appreciate your replies. Yes he has paid the original borrowed amount off but obviously interest on top in which is owed and offer to write off. I know it is only a small amount owing but I didn't know whether to attempt to pursue with reclaim of previous paid amount plus interest. Or just to accept their offer and have removed from Credit File.
    • breaking news More Tory MPs ‘pondering defecting’ 'bl**dy hell, if they'll have her I should be a shoe in. I dont stand a chance as a Tory, but I might if I'm the labour candidate' .. is rumored to be heard again and again at the Torys favorite  subsidised bars of Westminster.   More Tory MPs ‘pondering defecting’ as Natalie Elphicke ‘sorry’ - live WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Labour frontbencher says other Conservatives wrestling with their futures and calls grow for Diane Abbott to be let back into party "Wes Streeting insisted his party would not take just any Tory MP" .. as he looked nervously looked over his shoulder   We may be looking forward to a vote of no confidence in the Guv by the newly majority labour party as early as next week has allegedly been overheard
    • You were given this PCN because you overstayed not because you went to Starbucks or MaccyDs from the other car park. I assume therefore that the parking time is only 30 minutes as you were recorded as being there for 38 minutes. Given that there is a Consideration time and a Grace period  as well as the time between their photographs of your car arriving and leaving one wonders why they gave you a ticket. Force of habit I suppose. Because they are on airport land which is governed by Bye Laws that supercede PoFA we do not usually look at their PCNs there because in none of them can the charge be transferred from the driver to the keeper  as would normally happen after 28 days if the charge is unpaid and the land is not subject to Byelaws. In your case as they have failed to specify the Parking period  which is the time car is spent actually parked in a parking space not the bit that they include which is driving from the entrance to the parking space and the other bit from the parking space to the exit. As that reduces the lawful time you were actually parked I would suggest that they have breached your GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3914 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Police wont do anything. Neither will PPI companies as its too much work for very little reward for them.

 

WHat you need to do is get all your info together with evidence that it has been edited. Then you need to go through it thoroughly and start issuing full complaints. It's not going to be a quick process, but its better than handing over 30-40% of your reclaim to a silly company who sends two letters out. Yes, thats right. PPI companies usually just send out two letters and demand 30-40% of the reclaim for the privilege of doing so.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

have already made some complaints passed from piller to post nobody wants to take responsability as afar as they are concerned there system is perfect,even though they have me down as opening my bank account in 1957.......when i was 11 years old,there reply your parents must have opened a account in your name,------my parents have been dead since i was 6 years old my grandmother who took washing in to make ends meet brought me up---it must have been her then ,they just will not listen,as far as the gross misconduct is concerned in 2008 i converted my credit card debt into a bank loan in a loydds tsb branch i surrenderd my credit card with the intructions to close and destroy it and that is the last i heard of it until i received details from sar which shows that the card not only had not been destroyed but had the 15000 pounds limit reduced to 1000 pounds and kept open and monthly statements produced which never came to me so who did these statements go to and there data says the card was not closed until 2011 work that one out

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to get your evidence in order and make it clear and concise. The info you gave here rambles a little and is pretty haphazard with conjecture thrown in.

 

Once this is done, you need to get a full complaint in to the OFT and FCA, and to the lender. The lender then has 8 weeks to give you a response upon which the FOS can get involved. If you have a clear evidence trail and can conclusively prove what you say and not say " well, they must have done it cos i didnt", then the regulators can investigate. The key though is to keep everything simple, clear and right to the point. No regulator wants to read hearsay and opinion. They wait for a face to face meeting or phonecall interview for that.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could do. But you need to keep EVERYTHING in writing.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

as far as i understand the data protection act banks are only required to hold data for six or seven years

the reason being if a mistake was made or you wished to complain it was expected you would know about this within six years

so there would be no need to hold on to data after this,

 

but this was before the ppi scandal and the fact is thousands did not know they were being robbed and banks are using this guideline to pay out less .

 

question we all know banks keep records for much longer than this as in my case for 13 years,

but the bank are saying that due to data protection legislation even though they have the data they are not allowed to look at it in ppi cases over six years old work that one out

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a lot of bull. If they have the data, they are obliged to provide it to you. Have they put this statement in writing !

 

You should also request what legislation they are using to support this bizarre statement.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

due to data protection legislation even though they have the data they are not allowed to look at it in ppi cases over six years old

 

They are feeding you a load of baloney. This is completely untrue.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got this in writing please?

Very important.

If you haven't, was it said on the phone and if so did you record the call?

Link to post
Share on other sites

it gets worse.

i have already challenged them on this they insist they can only look back six years.

 

this is the credid card people

but i pointed out that after a sar request 13years of accounts have been reeiled,

 

they say and it is part in writing quote data protection legislation requires us to delete customer information from our files

once any legitimate business or legal requirement to retain it has expired

we therefore only have a need to keep credit card transactions for a period of 6 years as we would reasonably

expect that any need to look at the figures including complaint investigations arise in that timescale,

as such your account is longer than six years so we dont have any records,

that is what is in writing via the phone they more or less said they will only look at what they are legally obliged to keep ie six years

,when i pointed out that another debt of tsb has these records they say they are not legallt obliged to look at them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please will you reproduce the letter here.

 

Which bank?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please have your grand son follow the instructions below, after removing any personal information.

 

 

Dx100 – Instructions on uploading pdfs

scan the requiredletters/agreements/sheets

as a picture file

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint

but leave all figures and dates.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

or ir you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

 

Banks are supposed to keep data for 5/7 years after a financial relationship has ended - this according to tax and Money laundering laws. Although the ICO say that they only need keep data for as long as is necessary. We saw banks start providing only 6 years of data around the time of the bank charges reclaiming frenzy.. then they would only need to pay out 6 years worth of charges.. unless the claimant had retained their own statements ! Obviously with the PPI claims coming in thick and fast they are continuing to say that data is only available for 6 years in order to avoid repaying this money back !

 

If you have proof that they do have the information but are not providing it then that would be great.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do they actually say in writing that they hold the data but won't look at it? Or is it that they hold 13 years of data on your bank account but not on your credit card and the two separate arms of the organisation are doing totally different things? If it's the former you need to call the Information Commissioner helpline, as it is totally wrong. In fact, if you can speak to the bank's own data controller, they will probably agree that it is is totally wrong. if it's the latter it is probably still worth talking to the ICO.

 

I'm amazed that the PPI issue hasn't triggered some full investigations by the ICO, as there are clearly massive issues with data control within the banks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry i forgot to mention whiich bank it is lloyds tsb

 

Why does that not surprise me !!

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i do have proof

 

on one hand the credit card debt say they have no records of any credit cards ,

and after admitting misselling they can only pay out on assumtions,

 

after requesting a sar from their dept they send me 13 years of credit card statements,of 4 credit cards

they have only got 1 cca agreement dating back to 2000 which i think has been doctored

 

,there is a whole lot of wrong information for example the cca relates to a asset gold card but records show that it was a platinum card i took out

and a hole host of mistakes

 

so much so it leads me to beleive somebody has made a right mess of trying to change things,

but yes on one hand part of the bank say they have no records the other part send you 13 years worth,

 

i am nobody special if they hold these records for me i am sure it applies to everyone else,

they are really hard work to deal with but i will not give in

Edited by dickster 60
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

So initially the bank said they only had data going back 6 years, but then they found a full set of statements going back 13 years? And now they are refusing to calculate your PPI refund based on those statements? I understand there are lots of other issues about errors in the records, but is that the key problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes but to give you a glimpse into others

 

i also have a letter from the bank which i got in 2011 on my 65th birthday stating that the unemplyement cover now no longer applied to my ppi cover

witrh the relevant credit card number,

 

they say they have no record of this in their system,

 

also in 2008 i was talked into converting my credid card balance into a bank loan which hands up i agreed to

so i surrended my platinum card with the instructions to cancell it and be destroyed ,

 

i thought that was the case as i never ever got another credit card statement relating to that card.

 

until looking through all the paperwork from the sar request i find a lone statement dating oct 2009

the limit had been changed from 15k to 1 k and there was a zere balance

 

i also found in the paperwork that the card that i thought had been destroyed by the bank was not closed until 2011 what the hell is going on with these people

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like a terrible series of errors on your records. Do any of them actually impact on your PPI claim? I'd try to sort the problem out into two piles - calculations for your PPI claim and errors on your data file to create a complaint with the bank/ICO about.

 

Are the bank actually refusing to take into account all your credit card statements in their calculation for PPI? Have you written to them saying you have these statements and they need to take them into account in their calculation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have sent these statements off to the card poeple still awaiting reply

 

as far as call the mistakes i have been pased from piller to post and no one is prepared to take responcability

it is always somebody elses dept not theirs,

 

they keep giving me phone numbers which turn out to be the ppi complain/help line

 

,they told me to ring card servies in scotland and ask about this platinum card

 

i had been using up until 2008 with i suspect ppi on it ,

 

and you could not make it up

 

but according to their records i cancelled this card on dec 7th 2000

which is another reason i suspect a nasty smell,

 

what does others think

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there more than one credit card account? I thought you had the statements going back to 2000, so that should end the confusion. But did you have several card accounts running concurrently? Could they be talking about different card accounts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...