Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim for Lost Engagement Ring


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4046 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Last night I left my wedding and engagement rings at a studio we use at the local sports centre.

 

My husband and I were the only ones using the studio and the last ones out of the sports centre. I realise I'd left them on the table in the studio half way home, tried calling but no answer.

 

I phoned first thing this morning to find that the cleaners had already been and nobody had handed anything in!!

 

I have phoned the police to report them stolen, but wonder were I stand with my insurance policy, we added all of our rings to the policy when we bought them, so they are listed in the possessions section, but wonder if the fact that I forgot them will be a problem.

 

Any advice would be gratefully received.

 

Thanks

Tx

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will have to check their T&Cs.

Even if you are covered, your insurers are likely to wriggle. Check the wording very carefully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thank you for replying

There are two terms in particular that bother me - these are under what is not covered.

 

for theft or disappearance of jewellery from baggage unless

such baggage is carried by hand and under your personal

supervision

and

for unexplained or mysterious disappearance of jewellery or

watches

Any thoughts.

Thanks

Tx

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to be careful. The items left/stolen would needed to have been within your supervision at the time of loss. Obviously you had just left they behind, so they will ask many questions to find out why this was the case. They will also ask why the rings were not placed in a safe or locker or just left at home. They will ask whether it is usual for you to have taken the rings off. I think the Insurers will require a cognitive interview to be undertaken, which is designed to find out whether the claim event is likely to be truthful or not.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thank you for your response.

 

I always wear my rings, I have to take them off when we dance as they tend to cut into my husbands fingers. We use the same studio almost every week and we are the last session of the evening. No-one else is in the studio with us, nor could anyone come into the studio without us noticing.

 

I usually take my rings off and put them on the table next to the sound system and then put them back on as we leave, on this ocassion we got into the studio late after a mix up with our booking, so we left in a bit of a hurry as it was later than usual.

 

We called the sport centre several times as soon as we had realised, but with no answer. So we called back first thing before it opened, but was told that cleaners etc had already been around, and no-one had seen them.

 

So I called the police and left the details with them, they said that they would go down and speak to the manager. I haven't heard back about this yet

 

It's a truthful claim so I will happily go through an interview, to be honest I just want my rings back!

 

Tx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make enquiries with the studio about any CCTV that may be available and to advise them that a theft has been reported. Perhaps there is CCTV coverage of the studio ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately there is no CCTV in the studio, and I don't think there is any in the sports centre at all.

 

I told the manager that I would need to report them as stolen, but he wasn't really interested and said he didn't really know what they would do!

 

Tx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can se the insurance would be difficult on this as the rings wernt lost they appear to have been stolen but not from your home, i would report the theft to the police and get a crime number to back up your claim to the insurance, also the cleaning company may make investigations if you have reported it as a theft.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As advised, check the wording of the insurance policy but from what you point out above there is no mystery to the disappearance, they were stolen by persons unknown.

The other bit refers to things being pinched by baggage handlers so always carry valuable with you on planes.

get in touch with the police again and get a crime number if nothing else. If your insurers wont play ball then consider telling the sports centre you wish to claim against theirs and will sue if they dont co-operate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...