Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I am aware there’s been few threads about this already but just wanted to confirm information on my case. I was with Village gym last year(2023) on initial 6 month usual contract they do, I lost my job and due to that I couldn’t afford to pay for gym nor I had any motivation to go to gym at that time so they sent me arc phone message in September 2023 that I owed them £140 so I paid them back on instalments in 2 months time.  Then I started receiving new years deals in December 2023 and I decided to give them a call but they never mentioned anything about 6 month contract or anything, only that it would be monthly rolling contract and I paid them for 2 months and then I realised both months they charged me £59 instead of £38 they offered me on the phone when I mentioned that I am still student, even though before I was paying £43 a month in mid 2023. I spoke to gym entrance lady and she said I should give a call to gym on the phone number so I did and whoever answered said they’ll pass my info to manager and he will give me a call back in 24 hours, of course no one called me back so I called again and they said same thing. And of course once again no one got in touch with me so I got tired of them charging me more than they should and decided to cancel my direct debit and stopped going there as I got new job with rotation shifts which is not good for me as I cannot visit gym after I finish at 10pm every second week.  And now in April I received arc message saying this :  Also they have my old flat address where I used to live. What is the  best thing to do for me please? Thank you!
    • Richard Holden refusing ro answer Jon Craig's questions in a Sky pool interview and his spad argiung about the questions. As Jon said, not his finest hour.  
    • CCA to debt purchaser pap reply to sols with copy of CCA letter included  all as per post 2 in letter of claim thread 
    • If I go to court to defend my claim and will will my licence be unrevoked automatically?
    • Does this mean my driving licence is void now? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SCS Guardsman Policy Mis sold by SCS Staff


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4030 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I wonder if anyone can advise, on the way forward, back in 2008 We purchased a sofa and managed to get some discount off the sofa and put it on finance, part of this was the purchase of the guardsman policy for 5 years, we were told that we had to take this as part of the finance deal, even when asking could it be removed!!

In any case we were told that it would cover Accidental damage for any stains rips burns etc.. "we could even sit on some scissors and puncher the leather, this will be covered" their words not mine, they were almost reading out of the leaflet we got as part of the sale, which specifically says.

"No Pains with stains

For a Small additional charge you can increase your peace of mind with our superb Guardsman warranty. Available on leather and fabric upholstery, Guardsman covers you in event of staining to furniture or accidental rips, tears and burns for five years from purchase, ensuring the best protection for your new furniture (please refer to policy for full details).

Guardsman protection will help to prevent permanent staining of a suite, it cannot prevent general soiling."

My 2 year old Daughter unfortunately spilled nail varnish that she got hold of on the arm of the sofa and this has effectively stained the sofa, I called guardsman and they advised that it was not covered and under the policy it does say point 12 Any instance of staining.

I called SCS CS who advised me to call the branch, I spoke to the sales manager who asked to see the leaflet, I faxed this off and he called back to say that there was nothing he can do due to the fact the leaflet states (please refer to policy for full details) which we received a couple of months after the delivery of the sofa.

I have spoken to the Citizens Advice consumer helpline who have recorded the case and will pass on to trading standards, but that I should send a Breach of contract letter to SCS Customer services recorded.

My concern here is that im not entirely sure what to put in the letter and wondered if anyone else has had this issue, I know there is a lot of people in a very similar situation and that they feel misled regarding this.

Any help would be much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep thats about right sens

 

they wriggle out of it

 

IMHO i would reclaim the lot + the interest its cost you being added to the loan

 

we had that with them too

 

the foot rest wouldn't come out kept fouling.

 

had this valspar eng come around twice to look at it.

 

eventually after waiting 4mts of hearing nothing

phoned up

 

got told that the valspar eng's report said it had been probably bent by it being used to stand on to change

light bulbs in the cluster above it.

 

no claim

 

policy cost me £515!!

 

suit was £2300!

 

got pages of exclusions in the post [24 of them!]

 

claimed the £515 back + 8% stat int

 

took a few lettres and threats but they coughed up.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks

 

You dont happen to have what you said int he letter do you, so I can see what to put myself?

 

Thanks

 

yep thats about right sens

 

they wriggle out of it

 

IMHO i would reclaim the lot + the interest its cost you being added to the loan

 

we had that with them too

 

the foot rest wouldn't come out kept fouling.

 

had this valspar eng come around twice to look at it.

 

eventually after waiting 4mts of hearing nothing

phoned up

 

got told that the valspar eng's report said it had been probably bent by it being used to stand on to change

light bulbs in the cluster above it.

 

no claim

 

policy cost me £515!!

 

suit was £2300!

 

got pages of exclusions in the post [24 of them!]

 

claimed the £515 back + 8% stat int

 

took a few lettres and threats but they coughed up.

 

dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

treat it as a std PPI mis-sale reclaim

 

the additional warranty was mis-sold as there are so many exclusions

that i was never told about at the point of sale

that i think it is useless to me.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Sensimilia_uk,

 

I work for the ScS Online Team and would really like to look into this for you.

 

Please could you either send me your account number and post code via this page, visit our 'ScS Customer Support Facebook' page or visit our @ScSCustomerCare Twitter account where I will be able to help you further.

 

Many thanks,

 

Kate, the ScS Online Team

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Hello Sensimilia_uk,

 

I work for the ScS Online Team and would really like to look into this for you.

 

Please could you either send me your account number and post code via this page, visit our 'ScS Customer Support Facebook' page or visit our @ScSCustomerCare Twitter account where I will be able to help you further.

 

Many thanks,

 

Kate, the ScS Online Team

 

 

Have sent you a PM with my details

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have sent you a PM with my details

 

Hello Sensimilia.

 

You may find that your PM hasn't arrived, because you don't have enough posts to PM other CAG users.

 

If you don't want to use Facebook or Twitter, you can send the information to one of the site team to forward to Kate. Or perhaps Kate can provide an email address for you to use.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks I didn't see anything come up when sending so assumed it went, but on looking in sent items there is 0, I don't fancy passing my personal details on here so it would be good if Kate_SCS could provide an email address to contact her directly?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just an update, ive had communication from SCS, the on-line team missed the point that I was complaining about it being mis sold, once they found this out, they got a store manager to call me who also missed the point about my complaint, they have advised that an area sales manager will call me, and ive not had that call as yet.

 

Although it has been easter so ill give them a little more time before taking it further

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just had a call from the area sales manager who automatically said that he believed it was not mis sold,

and advised that there would have been information and leaflets around the store detailing that staining was not covered,

even though I have a leaflet given to me to point of sale which gives mis leading infromation,

he even said that he could not remember the wording form back in 2007!!

 

He has requested the leaflet that I have to be faxed to him,

but has said he will respond with the belief that I was not mis sold,

 

so the question is,

 

what's involved with going to a small claims court,

or is this a step too far at this stage,

 

he did say he will write to me so I have something in writing,

 

but id love to open the flood gates for anyone who may have been mis sold this insurance before

Link to post
Share on other sites

matters not about any 'signage' anywhere

 

it could even say in great bold letter

 

'OUR INSURANCE DONT COVER XYZ'

 

the fact you were told it did

overwrites his ' our salestaff & polices were XYZ'

 

bit like the PPI scandal.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh and WRITING ONLY.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Sensimilia_uk,

 

Are you having any luck with this? I hope you get your problem resolved. I might be faced with a similar problem (I hope not, should know when I get home), so I am curious about your progress. Good luck with.

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...