Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BW Legal.Statutory Demand


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3727 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

we arrived home this evening to a letter claiming that we had been visited on 3 occasions

and that whoever they are are visiting again on 9/1/13 to serve my wife with a Statutory Demand.

 

The only thing we can think off that this might refer to is a Cap one CC we had a few years ago

which was sold to lowell. 2 or 3 years back

 

we applied for the credit agreement from Lowell and got the usual stuff back from them

which turned out to be nothing more than an application for the card,

 

ignored them and now this.

 

Now my wife is on benefits due to ill health (I work) and we have a mortgage with neg equity

and a charging order already on the house.

 

What would be the best route for us to go down?

 

Many Thanks

 

Sorry if this is posted in the wrong place....

Edited by gporter3319
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi GP

 

Take a read here :- http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?162131-Statutory-Demands-and-Service-By-Post I have reported your post for further attention from the Site team.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very likely to be a capone debt - Lowells are working overtime issuing stat demands on a bulk purchase by the looks of things.

 

You need to get this set aside - when it has been delivered then you have 18 days to get it set aside. Do write on the envelope the date and time it was delivered.

 

If there is an outstanding s78 request then that is one reason as the account is basically in dispute

 

Do you have any other paperwork, notice of assignment, Default Notice from Capone/termination notice ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,we arrived home this evening to a letter claiming that we had been visited on 3 occasions and that whoever they are are visiting again on 9/1/13 to serve my wife with a Statutory Demand.The only thing we can think off that this might refer to is a Cap one CC we had a few years ago which was sold to lowell. 2 or 3 years back we applied for the credit agreement from Lowell and got the usual stuff back from them which turned out to be nothing more than an application for the card,so basically ignored them and now this.Now my wife is on benefits due to ill health (I work) and we have a mortgage with neg equity and a charging order already on the house.What would be the best route for us to go down? Many Thanks

Sorry if this is posted in the wrong place....

 

So you don't really have anything to lose, by Lowells losing money on bankruptcy. They will issue these SD's before working out whether it is worth going forward with bankruptcy or not. Once they realise that it is not worth it, they won't bother.

 

Anyway, once you get the statutory demand you can try for the set aside and as long as you state valid reasons for this, they are mostly accepted. However, sometimes with a judge lottery, this can fail. Lowells might argue that they fulfilled the CCA request, so failure to action the CCA request is not a valid reason.

 

Suggest that you send an SAR req to CapOne, if it does relate to this and ask them for copies of all statements, as well as all other data they hold. Perhaps there may be charges on the account, you can look to get back and that would help, if you wanted to stop bankruptcy.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with all that has been said above.....get a SAR sent out immediately, and once you have the demand in your hands you can set it aside. Spend some time reading around these forums, and you will be come more knowledgable. The fact it has been in dispute for a while will hold strong ground in front of a judge. When was the last time you made a payment towards the debt ? is it 6 years ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other possible option is to send an email to BWLegal along the lines of

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

I am aware that you are attempting to serve a statutory demand on me, the specific particulars of which I am unaware of, however I have to inform you that if it relates to an original dispute, then I will have no hesitation in setting this aside at my local court and will claim my costs in the process. I am sure I have no need to remind you of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 and the Office Of Fair Trading's guidelines on debt collection.

 

If in the event you continue with this action, bearing in mind any dispute, then when the issue of costs arises I will have no hesitation in showing this and previous correspondence to the judge. Please note the date of this letter.

 

I trust this makes my position completely clear.

 

Yours faithfully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

a bankruptcy petition is not an option until they have deemed served the sd, and then after at least 18 days after that if the sd is not satisfied/compounded or set aside. they would then need to petition for bankruptcy (which could also be challenged depending on the circumstances).

some gov't info re bankruptcy etc http://www.bis.gov.uk/insolvency/Publications

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

We have no grounds to have the sd set aside and no real chance of having it satisfied due to my wife being on incapacity benefit.Has I said in an earlier comment if they do file for bankruptcy am I still "guilty by association" kind of thing even though the debt is not in my name.Also should I just let them go ahead and file for bankruptcy being has we are in neg equity and also already have a charging order on the house from a another debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do you say you have no grounds to set aside?

did you see the link posted re bankruptcy?

here's some more info. note 'beneficial interest'. http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/england_wales/factsheet.php?page=01_bankruptcy

as UncleB says, could might as well apply for set aside, seems nothing to lose by doing so?

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

What grounds would I need to get it set aside.Yes saw the link but not quite sure what the beneficial interest means...

 

as the nat debt line link says, any poss particular bankruptcy would be re your wifes 'interest'/share depending on the circumstances which may end up affecting the whole. also, you say there is negative equity, and other secured creditors which would affect things.

main grounds for a set aside have been posted. dispute, counterclaim (any missold ppi for eg?), amount disputed, statute barred? technical errors, etc

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

haven't sent the email yet don't know where to send it to and the last payment was about 2 years ago I think to lowells.My wife paid them twice and then I came across this site and went down the cca road.At 1st they sent nothing and then months later sent all the cap 1 statements .She ignored them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just sent the email....

 

oh ok! was going to suggest an addon to it if not already sent! no probs though, see what they come back with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just something cheeky along lines of asking them to confirm in writing that if they do continue to serve an sd that they will in fact pursue a bankruptcy petition in the unlikely event that the demand is not set aside. :)

could've worked either way, but no worries, actually could be good to see what they come back with re your email?

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

who do i Sar ?

 

looking back from what has been posted, seems capone. but, maybe best wait abit first see what details if any they come back re your email?

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

Right then SD posted thru door today.It appears that its for Monument CC £3565.Defaulted in Oct 2007.Never had any letters of assignment from either original creditor or Lowells.Should I CCA them or offer token payment due to wife being on benefits and having Neg equity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...