Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Housing Association trying to evict me for rent arrears


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4145 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Do you still have the reciepts of your payments of £878 + £200 or a bank statement shown these at all?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not receive any pay because my employer was saying that i had been made redundant it turned out that they had done so in error but took them nearly nine months to sort the mess out, sending me to Occupational Health in August since February 2012. I contacted HA a few months after i began my work related sickness ie about May 2012. I had no money to pay reny but as soon as i could which was mid October, I paid £200 then £200 agin in November & this month full rent. I told the HA shortly after i returned to work that i was back at work but they wanted £3,000 before agreeing any repayment. This month is the 1st month i have received full pay so this is the 1st month i have paid full rent

Link to post
Share on other sites

First, the particulars of claim are defective. The CPR states that the grounds relied on must be specified, and they are not. It is likely the judge will allow the HA time to amend the PoC and reserve on you.

 

Second, if you state you did not receive the notice referred to in the PoC, then you MUST inform the judge of this - the judge does have jurisdiction to dispense with the service of notice if he deems this necessary in the interests of justice. My view is a social landlord should not be allowed to claim service of notice was not required.

 

The above two points are technical issues - they are unlikely to mean that the claim will be struck out, particularly given the level of the arrears. But they may mean a slight adjournment for the amendment to take place. Do not rely on this - the judge does have discretion to dispense with both points at the hearing.

 

You are going to have to phone the HA tomorrow and ask them what grounds they are claiming under. It is impossible for me to guess (well, I could, but it would be foolhardy to give advice on a guess), and frankly, impossible to give accurate advice without knowing the specifics.

 

Your arrears are substantial, amounting to over 8 months worth of arrears. On an AST that would usually mean a mandatory claim for possession, however the HA may be lenient enough to only use discretionary grounds, in which case if you can put together a reasonable proposal to repay the arrears, they may consider this. But until we are clear what grounds they are claiming under, any advice is tenuous at best. (In the interim, if you find your way over to the repossessions forum, you can download a copy of the income and expenditure form to fill in.)

 

Can you phone them tomorrow and ask them what grounds they are claiming possession on and whether they can forward you a copy of the notice they claim they sent (they will have to provide a copy to the court, so it should be no issue to provide you with another one - remind them that the court expects them to provide you with a copy of all evidence they intend to rely on in court).

Link to post
Share on other sites

What OP can request of HA is monthly rent account statement for duration of T and copy of Notice served prior to Court application. This Notice is deemed served 2 working days after posying, if properly addressed and mailed by First Class post. No acknowledgent of receipt by T required, so holidyays etc irrelevent.

The Court claim is for rent arrears, (tick box selection), as detailed in the prior (unseen) HA Notice of Intent (s8?)

 

If OP contacts HA by tel tomorrow, s/he should gets works email address of person spoken to or dept email, so the contents of the conversation can be confirmed and evidenced from email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's possible the HA may not be open until after new year (certainly this is the case for the one I work for), so if this is the case contact the court and let them know that you need information from them before you can submit your defence.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IANAL (employment nor LL&T) but some things do not compute without sight of OPs Contract ot Employment

1 OP went on sick leave for a 'work related' codition.

How long had OP worked for Co prior to sick leave? Was Statutory Sick leave payable/received forthis period?

2 OP was subs made reduntant (rules on selecting employees on sick leave for redundancy?) and later re-instated due to procedural error), so basic back pay & poss compensation should be payable.

3 OP decided not to apply for HB due to 'intrusive' forms & expectation of early employment With/out a dependent child, you claim for due due benefits. Worth a day form filling, but OPs decision not to apply, despite accruing rent arrears!

 

Rent owing is a finacial debt and AIUI HA under no obligation to offer/accept any suggested repayment sched. (reasonable offers for repayment not be unreasonably rejected. Judge to determine reasonable terms).

 

Whilst Council may be obliged to provide temp accom, due to child, most are not obliged to offer perm accom, as evictionfor rent arrears is perceived as 'intentionally homeless'

I suggest OP pursues poss income streams, poss against employer

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have edited your documents as some of your personal information was showing through.. Have also turned all the pages right way up :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Highly unlikely at this stage Surfer01. The HA, like all other social landlords, will be extremely reluctant to move any one in arrears from one property to another. This is because the arrears relate directly to the property that the tenant is in, and creating a new tenancy for another property means that they lose their 'security' and ability to evict for non-payment. A tenant could, if allowed to move and take up a new tenancy, simply stop paying towards the arrears and apart from the usual enforcement action for any other debt, the LL would have no power to evict from the new property (if all rent is paid and up to date). Hence, the likelihood of being moved whilst arrears are as substantial as the OP's are slim to none.

 

The rent is very high, and the OP may have found she was entitled to some HB, or LHA, but clearly made the choice not to make an application at all, which has contributed to her position and the level of arrears.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

OP said she chose not to apply for HB as she felt the forms were intrusive. One can only assume this was a constant opinion throughout (i.e during ill health) and not only when the HA told her to claim 4 months ago (see post 1).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shelter is your best for advice, they are used to dealing with HA and the courts and will give very good advice and will attend court if necessary.

try on line or phone, dont give up, they are probably busy at this time of year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...