Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • First thing to do is what the the DVLA website extract says - write to the Central Casework Group with full details of your licence, adding that you spoke to DVLA call centre xx/xx/xxxx and they told you they couldn't see the details either.  Get proof of posting. Are you in physical possession of your Driving Licence Photocard? And the card shows it is still current? If so include a photocopy of it when you write to DVLA. There's no reason for you to assume that the licence has been cancelled or that you have been banned. Just some IT problem at DVLA. I wouldn't go into all the stuff about your court case last year. There's no evidence that the current glitch in the DVLA system is anything to do with it and it will just muddy the waters.  Most comparision sites ask for your licence number. You can get quotes without the licence being checked but when you take up an insurer's quote they then check your licence number against the DVLA website to make sure it is valid and to check if any Points for motoring offences are recorded. If you are unable to access your licence details on DVLA then insurers won't be able to either so they will refuse to proceed and cancel their quote. 
    • How about posting the full email, rather than just the bits you want us to see??
    • Hi Folks,   Thank you for your help so far. Please find below the correspondence so far from various parties. If I've missed anything, please let me know. Again, apologies for not posting the correct stuff. I thought I'd lost it all, turns out it was on a rarely used pc Letter advising of change of address will be posted shortly, with proof of posting not tracked. Buncrana 1 Edited Notice To Keeper ECP.pdf 2 ECP Back of PCN.pdf 3 DRP Edited 25012021.docx 4 DRP Back of letter.docx 5 POPLA Appeal redacted.pdf 6 DCBL 30:04:24 Redacted.pdf ESSO Cobham Signage.pdf
    • Thanks just looked at SARequest It wouldn’t make ebay have to say why they suspended me. all their email said was that it was related to buying activity. But under that bike buying activity there are about five different reasons why it could’ve been. But they haven’t specified which of these five reasons it was.
    • Thank you Ethel, their letter was literally one line, with an added bonus of a typo..... "As you own the land that the property was damaged on we would not be able to dela with that aspect of the claim.", so I think it may be the initial fob off. I have replied just stating "This is not correct, the fence is owned by XYZ ltd, please clarify?", but will follow it up with a letter from the company. will let you know how I get on x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Honours/Drydens claimform - old SLC Loans stayed - now n244 sj/strike out


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2638 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am just wondering if anyone can advice me on what to do.

I took out a student loan while at uni during the 1997-2001.

I cannot remember paying or not paying towards the loan.

As I understood it if you are earning £2318 or less per month (as stated on the letter sent to me by honour student) you can defer payment.

I was made redundant in November 2010 and I am now self employed since January 2012.

I have not been responding to their letters for the past 6 years or so as I am not earning close to that amount.

I received a claimform through the post on the 15th of October from Northampton Court that I am owing £6236.16

Out of panic and confusion I didnt do anything

this morning I log on to the MoneyClaim website where I filed and sent off the Acknowledgement of Service that

"I intend to defend part of this claim.

As I only have 14 days to do so as I do not want judgement to be entered against me as I believe the amount I owe is way less that £6236.16.

My confusion is that I dont know what to do now.

Please any advice/information will be well appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 163
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Confused and welcome to CAG

 

If you could type out the particulars of claim (verbatim)

 

Any defence only needs to be submitted by the 16th Nov.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is an 'old' style student loan (which it looks to be) look here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?191527

 

And providing you have not made any payments for 6 years or acknowledged the debt in writing - 5 years in Scotland (or there is a gap of at least 6 years where you have not made a payment) then it will be statute barred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy and 42man

The particulars of claims reads like this

1. The Claimant's (Honours Trustee Ltd) claim is for the sum of £5918.92 due under loan agreements between the Claimant (including predecessors in title) and the Defendant dated between 29/01/1998 and regulated by the consumer Credit Act 1974.

2. The defendant has failed to comply with the Default Notice served under Section 87 (1) on 16/12/2006 (I didn't think I received this from them)

And the Claimant claims

1. The sum of 5918.92

2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 totalling 27.24 to 15/10/2012 and continuing until judgement or payment at a daily rate of 1.29730

3. Costs

Drydens Limited t/a drydensfairfax solicitors.

 42man, Yes I do think its an old style student loan, but can I still statute bar even now that they've issued a court claim.

 

Thank you>

Link to post
Share on other sites

" but can I still statute barred even now that they've issued a court claim."

 

Providing you have not made payment or acknowledged within a period of 6 years then yes its SB, the Summons is irrelevant.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming you have not made payment or acknowledged then follow the N1 (summons ) process..you have 33 days 5 deemed served so 28 (14 to Acknowledge Service and if defending a further 14 to submit your defence.

You will submit a Statute Barred Defence....that should extinguish the matter...end of.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed you had submitted a 'partial defence'

the statute barred defence is a total defence....

I am interested to know how and if you can change the plea ?

The statute barred defence is here -

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?162456-Help-with-statute-barred-debt-county-court-claim-form

Link to post
Share on other sites

No defence submitted yet 42man only AoS " "I intend to defend part of this claim "

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to really 42 as a defence still has to be submitted and will still be treated as a defend all...the defence will reiterate that.The Claimant can not submit a N225/N227 (request for judgment)

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys,

 

As I understood it now, I need to send two letters back to the court. Hope I've got this right. My defence and the Limitation Letter.

 

1. Statute Barred defence link from 42man:

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (date).

 

2 The Claimant defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980. If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.

Do not allow denial as you know it to be true, change last sentence to ' the claimant should already be aware more than 6 years have elapsed between cause of action accrued and the court claim by their court submission.'

3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £x or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

I BELIEVE THAT THE CONTENTS OF THIS DEFENCE ARE TRUE.

Be more assertive and disallow doubt to appear, change 'believe' to 'am absolutely certain'

Signed:

 

Dated:

 

AND

 

2. The limitation letter from the thread (#19)

 

 

Sorry, just a little bit still confused hope I've got it right.

 

I will redraft mine now and keep you posted.

 

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just submit the defence on line...should be the end of the matter.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much guys.

 

I have written the defence letter and posted it recorded delivery to Drydensfairfax on the 31st of Oct.

 

All I have to do now is wait and see.

 

I appreciate you all for your help and advice. Million thanks.

 

 

I'll keep you posted.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence must go to Northampton not the Sols...they could misplace it and request judgment.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Andy, I'll do that straight away.

Thanks

Hello,

Defence sent to the court. Thank you.

Good evening guys,

I received a letter from Honours Student Loans dated 30th October 2012.

Which reads as follow:

NOTICE OF SUMS IN ARREARS

Balance £xxxx.xx

We are required to give you this notice in compliance with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 because you are behind with your payments under the agreement.

This notice is for information purposes only and is not demand for payment. Please continue to direct all your correspondence and telephone calls to Drydens Solicitors.

I am more confused now. Why have they sent me this letter and what does it mean and what should I do.

Many thanks for advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No idea why they have sent this to you. Perhaps it was a document they should have sent years ago, but they did not. Anyway your defence is statute barred and they have to prove otherwise.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

This amendment has been made in case of failure to give notice of sums in arrears in CCA 1974. Section 11 CCA 2006 inserts a new section - 86D - that sets out the consequences for a creditor or owner if he fails to give a notice as required by sections 86B or 86C.

 

If the creditor or owner fails to provide a notice of sums in arrears when required to do so, then during the period of his failure to provide the notice (i.e. from the date that it was required to be given until the end of the day on which it is eventually provided), he is not entitled to enforce the agreement.

 

Pity they issued it after litigation but they are trying...bless them.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good afternoon everyone.

 

I just received a letter dated 12th of November from Honours's solicitor.

 

"We write with regard to the above matter and further to your recent letter at these offices.

 

Given the contents of your letter we confirm that we are now taking our clients instructions and will respond to you in full in the next 14 days".

 

 

They have completely ignore the 7 days reply notice I gave them in my letter and they are now asking for further 14 days. ??????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let them take as long as they wish ........defence has been submitted...there is no response to a SB defence..apart from a Notice of Discontinuence :madgrin:

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...