Honours/Drydens claimform - old SLC Loans stayed - now n244 sj/strike out

[confusedoldstudent]

Just a quick question am I meant to change anything from the statement below ...,...

 

"Interest pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 totaling 27.24 to 15/10/2012 and continuing until judgement or payment at a daily rate of 1.29730

Costs"

[AndyOrch]

Just a quick question am I meant to change anything from the statement below ...,...

 

"Interest pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 totaling 27.24 to 15/10/2012 and continuing until judgement or payment at a daily rate of 1.29730

Costs"

 

No...why ?

[confusedoldstudent]

The 27.24 to 15/10/2012........ and the 1.29730 ....what does it mean

 

 

totaling 27.24 to 15/10/2012 and continuing until judgement or payment at a daily rate of 1.29730

Costs

[AndyOrch]

Thats is just the section 69 interest calculation of the claim and should they get judgment will be updated once (if)judgment is permitted

[confusedoldstudent]

ok, good.

 

on my way to the court now to submit my witness statement.

 

im really grateful and thank you guys very much.

 

finger crossed for a favourable result.

 

many thanks once again

[confusedoldstudent]

Good morning,

 

A quick update, I am yet to receive the claimant witness statement but instead i received a letter of their client statement of cost.

 

....what should i do? should i call them to request for it please and what do i do with the statement of cost please.

 

thanks

[dx100uk]

IMHO you do nothing?

 

Not for you to chase?

[Guest]

they are submitting that as they requested costs for the SJ hearing if successful, yr post #87.

you can do the same if you want, ie yr costs for the hearing should they be unsuccessful? or just request costs at the hearing?

see what the guys say.

[confusedoldstudent]

ok, many thanks guys.

 

............ im a little bit nervous, please, any advice on how to proceed or what to do when i get there tomorrow,

[AndyOrch]

On arrival at the CC.....check in with the Court Usher and give your details and case details and then wait.You will be called to the appropriate court number....the DJ will then direct everything.

 

Andy

[dx100uk]

watchout for them wanting a little chat before you go in

they might try and unsettle you.

 

 

dx

[confusedoldstudent]

hmmm, really. i"ll watchout

 

thanks guys

[confusedoldstudent]

hi all, good evening

went to court today.........i was a nervous wreck when i got there, as i was a little late.

when we started the dj asked the claimant sol if he had gone through my defence and witness statement to which he claimed no, that they did not receive any from me.........at this point i told the dj i sent a copy to them as well as the court.

he offered his copy to the solicitor to read and told him he can request for the case to be adjourn or if he want we can continue. After reading his offered copy the sol said he wishes to continue that "its the same defence of limitation which there is no bases to"

At this stage the dj said we can,........ i noticed they both brought out a bundle of paper, i suspected this will be claimant statement.

.....when the dj was going through the documents i immediately told him i have not got the statement. the dj queried why i havent got a copy and how i was aware of the case against me. i showed him the letter i received from the sol and the court.

pheww.....the dj now said the case has to be adjourned and i must file in my revised statement by 2 weeks time.

[Guest]

evening

what do you need to revise on?

[confusedoldstudent]

.......lest i forget, the judge also said i will have to do more than LIMITATION in view of defending the case

 

i am going through the 9 pages statement given to me by the judge now......

[Guest]

why did they say limitation has no basis

[confusedoldstudent]

I dont know why, the sol said that but i guessed/thought it was to dismissed my defence or so. But it was when the dj now said i were you i would do more than LIMITATION

[Guest]

the sol/claimants wit statement should say why they think limitation is n/a.

and, as you said, the J seems to have hinted it also...

[confusedoldstudent]

I thought i might need to update it based on the claimant statement

[AndyOrch]

You may not need to revise your WS ...subject to the contents of theirs...can you scan their WS in or type it in verbatim (less any identifiable data) .

 

Andy

[confusedoldstudent]

thanks guys,

 

i'll scan it through.

 

please.........should i paste it on here or pm you guys

[AndyOrch]

Post it here ...as long as you remove any identifiable contents.

[confusedoldstudent]

ok, thanks

[dx100uk]

pop it up in PDF

read the upload guide

[confusedoldstudent]

Good morning, attached below is ws.

 

many thanks

Document.pdf