Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 7 weeks now. What happens if they don''t get back to me within the 8 weeks? They have to provide me a final response in that time frame right? 
    • Referring back to to your initial post... So not a judgment ?
    • I have never heard of any such law. Please post a link to what you have read online that explains this law. And please confirm whether you were ever married to or in a formal Civil Partnership with your Ex.
    • Today has been hectic so  have been unable to complete the whole thing. If you now understand it and want to go ahead with a complaint to the IPC, fine. If not then I won't need to finish it. But below is my response to your request  on post 64. No you don't seem stupid, the Protection of Freedoms Act isn't easy to get one 's head around at first. The part of the above Act referring to private parking is contained within Schedule 4 which you can find online under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Section 9 of SCH.4 relates to how the parking scrotes have to perform so that they can transfer their right to pursue the keeper from the driver when the PCN is still unpaid after a certain amount of time. In your case the PCN was posted to you the keeper and arrived within 14 days from when they claimed a breach occurred. That means they complied with first part of the Act. The driver at that time was still responsible to pay the charge demanded on the PCN and PCM now have to wait for 28 days to elapse before they can write and advise the keeper that as the charge has not been paid, that they now have the right to pursue the keeper. They claim they sent the first PCN on the 13th March, five days after the alleged breach and it arrived on Friday 15th March. So to comply with the Act they have to observe Section 8 subsection 2f   (f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given— (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So the first PCN was deemed to arrive on the 15th March and for 28 days to have elapsed is when the time is right for them to write and say you are now liable as keeper. So they sent the next PCN on the 12th April which is too early as you could still have paid until midnight of the 12th. So the earliest their second PCN should have gone to you was  Saturday 13th April so more likely on Monday 15th April. The IPC Code of Conduct states "Operators must be aware of their legal obligations and implement the relevant legislation and guidance when operating their businesses." So by issuing your demand a day early, they have broken the Act, the IPC Code of Conduct, the DVLA agreement  to abide by the law and the Code of Conduct not to mention a possible breach of your GDPR .   I asked the IPC  in the letter on an earlier to confirm that  CPMs Notice misrepresenting the law was a standard practice for all of PCMs Notices or just certain ones. Their distribution  may depend on when they were issued and whether they were issued in certain localities or for certain breaches. Whichever method used is a serious breach of the Law and could lead to PCM being black listed by the DVLA . One would expect that after that even if the IPC did not cancel your ticket, PCM could not risk going to Court with you nor even pursuing you any further.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MCOL For cancelling Life Insurance Policy


Basejumper
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4061 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have a read of http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part38In in particular, 38.6

 

(1) Unless the court orders otherwise, a claimant who discontinues is liable for the costs which a defendant against whom the claimant discontinues incurred on or before the date on which notice of discontinuance was served on the defendant.

BUT

(3) This rule does not apply to claims allocated to the small claims track.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Mike_hawk yes it is a N279 signed and dated 21st Mar. I may have difficulty in scanning it as I have moved jobs but basically it states:

To the Court

The Claimant (tick only one box)

Discontinues all of this (claim)

against the (defendant)

signed and dated

 

Hi steampowered - I have read this and I have also gone to the additional section mentioned i.e. 44.12 and I am still unsure if I can or cannot. would it be best to write and ask for direction or order that cost up to this point are claimed and hope the DJ will allow the £9.25 ph or a proportion of what would be expected if a solicitor did this work for me? I seem to remember that a while ago when Surfacagent x20 was on the scene we could end a document that we wish cost to be taken in to consideration as a LiP at a such and such rate - cant find it now but will keep digging

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though 38.6 may not apply to SCT:-

 

http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/_old/part27 PD27.14.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Base

 

I'd check with the court that the notice has been filed then consider what [if anything] you want to do about costs.

 

The reference Andy provided above should assist, in effect 38.6 precludes the costs issue being deemed [ordered by right at discontinuation] within the sct. That doesn't mean that you can't recover, just that you would need to apply for relief.......... another £45.00!

 

Perhaps if your costs are minimal, circa £200.00 for the allocation hearing etc it may be useful to contact it and find out if it wants to settle the matter amicably or risk further unnecessary costs in the application.

 

Oh and, very well done by the way :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mike_hawk

Thank you for your support. I have not had an opportunity to contact the court yet to confirm the notice of discontinuance, however, it is first on my 'things to do' for tomorrow list.

Following on from the posts above I have found this... please see link below. I was wondering if this has merit in forming my application or letter to the court, I can then quote a court of appeal case that rules about costs. I like in particular this reference:... "It was clear that the claimant knew what the second defendant’s position was and that it wished to contest its liability for the claim. The claimant proceeded to *discontinue his claim which meant the court was unable to determine what the outcome would be at trial. Therefore, the circumstances were the usual consequences of discontinuing: the claimant becomes liable for the defendant’s costs".

 

http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/costs-liability-discontinuing-a-claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Base

 

The case may be useful but given the value I probably wouldn't argue it beyond a couple of phone calls and a letter to the other side in the short term.

 

You won, anything else is a bonus

 

CPR27.3 is your friend in respect of costs within 27.14 and PD27.7

 

I'd send it a stinging response advising it has the opportunity to settle your costs at £ (a reasonable sum) absent which you will file an application increasing same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good evening all.

I have checked with the court and they have received the Notice of Discontinuance. The kind lady at the court was asked by myself if i could send a letter to the court for costs and she said yes and it would go before a DJ, however, from the post above I would like to get some clarification on the phase "I'd send it a stinging response" does the 'it' refer to the claimants solicitors or should I just send a letter to the court quoting the case reference Messih v McMillan Williams & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 844 above and make reference to summary costs at the rate of £18 ph for LiP AND 27.3; 27.14 AND PD 27.7?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All - I have been digging around and found some info :wink:

 

I am hoping if someone could pop by and cast a critical eye over the attached

 

Thank you in advance

 

[ATTACH]42902[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default rule is that there are no costs in SCT, even after a notice of discontinuance. To get costs you need to fall within the categories set out in CPR27.14. The only one which looks relevant is "(g) such further costs as the court may assess by the summary procedure and order to be paid by a party who has behaved unreasonably". I think you should refer to this and you need to explain why the other side has behaved unreasonably.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello steampowered. Thank you for your advice. Having researched threads on here dating back to 2009 onward, I have been of the impression that up to the point a track is nominated, I would be in a position to claim expenses, now that the claimants went on to discontinue. however, I would have preferred it to have gone to trial, then it could have been ruled whether or not the terms of business agreement was in fact an unfair contract against my submitted defence. That we will never know, i suppose. :???:

It is intended to send this to the claimants solicitors accompanied with a N252 and press to test as to whether they will go someway to pay costs or I will have no hesitation in taking the matter to court, hopefully get a ruling on their terms of business agreements and then have all of this resolved through the courts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

N252 is used when you already have an order awarding you costs, and you then need a detailed assessment to decide the level of those costs.

 

I think you would need to use N244 asking for an order that you are awarded costs. Accompany with a witness statement setting out why you think you should get this order. I think it is worth attaching a schedule of costs and asking for them to be summarily assessed in the amount you are asking for.

 

The court will not decide whether the agreement is unfair now they have discontinued, unfortunately we will never know as the court will only look at the issue in dispute which is costs. Good luck.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That advice appears sound, steampowered, thank you. and thank you for correcting the form number.

I have already submitted a witness statement, but that was during the case process. is there another or different template that i should follow and file or just a letter to the case manager. I was hoping to shoot one across their (claimants and claimants sols) bows, a scare tactic i suppose in order to avoid court action but with the knowledge that would be expressed to them that court action would follow if they did not respond in say 21 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...