Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Interview under caution/ capital


kate2212
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4287 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I am totally panicing as my husband has an interview under caution on thursday. The only information that we have is the letter asking him to attend. Our story is pretty complicated but here it is.

 

We had some buytolet properties and our own property, all with mortgages, however due to redundancy (my job) and rental gaps, found that we were at the point of no return and the bank started reposession of the rental properties. Our own house was also included in this. We were visited by a rep of the bank and he basically told us to move and get a rental property asap, as we had kids, and he knew our sitaution was inevitable.

 

So my husband made a claim for himself me and the kids, as we had no income. There is no equity in any of the properties due to the current market, and our own house either. We moved into a rental property and have been looking for jobs, and awaiting someone making us bankrupt. We have no capital, savings or anything.

 

We are racking our heads about what this is. My husband cannot remember what he put on the form as we have been so stressed over the past year, plus I was having tests to do with my heart due to stress and he was worried. But he was upfront when attending his meeting about us owning propeties. I also received around xmas a small amount from my previous employer, but this was outstanding money due to me, less that £800. There were some small amounts of rent that went into the business account but these were paid direct to debters.

 

Am feeling awful as I don't want my husband to go to court of jail, and my profession is a notifiable one, so I would never get a job again.

 

I am ill with worry, and feel so guilty, but don't know what we have done. I am trying so hard to get a job, I feel like I am going mad.

 

Any help appreciated.

 

Thanks for reading and sorry for waffeling, don't know if it makes sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had our interview under caution! They ended up cautioning me too! Don't know if that is normal practice?????? The meeting was only for my husband, but as I was there they decided to include me too! I would like to ask if anyone knows if their behaviour is normal. At the end, of a 2 hr meeting, the investigator from the Council gave me his phone number and asked for some more info, I stated that I would email or post it. He said that he would come collect it???? Is he able to visit us at home, is that not strange. As he went on to say that if I phone him he is unable to talk about the investigation. Feel uneasy about this all.

 

 

Have now made an appointment with a criminal lawyer, as am sure they will prosecute! After reading other people's experiences I think it is a foredrawn conclusion. Am totally gutted. Not only have we lost our house/business we are going to be prosecuted. I have had former tennnats inpersonate me and commit fraud gain items from catalogues, extra benefits and money and am still waiting for the police to prosecute them 18 months later, and we have to wait 2 months for a decision and have been told by lawyer over the phone, if they even suspect they will go for it!!!! Devastated is an under statement. :mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

That they had checked the land registry and spoke to a neighbour at my old house, who told them that we were always at the house! The house is up for sale, locks changed etc. Only went a few times before it was reposessed to collect mail. Didn't even like doing that as it was too emotional.

 

At this point I feel like adding up all the benefits we have been given and pay it back! I don't have any money, but could ask my parents to pay and I would rather owe them than the DWP. I just feel so low. I have never claimed anything before, and when we needed too, have had this happen.

 

The investigator did not understand the reposession process of a house and that I will get no money out of the sale. But on the bright side the lawyer sounds knowledgable.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does a nursing registration need a clear CRB? Not sure if the CRB showing up a benefit conviction would count or not? Maybe someone else would know. Mind, many don't go to court if you agree to repay, sometimes needing to accept a penalty on top. Sorry, I'm not much help as my knowledge of this is really low but I wish you all the best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I go to court, and get charges against me then I would also have to answer to the NMC, who would probably suspend my registration. therefore not being able to work as a nurse.

 

Thanks for your replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I go to court, and get charges against me then I would also have to answer to the NMC, who would probably suspend my registration. therefore not being able to work as a nurse.

 

Thanks for your replies.

 

Have you spoken to your union rep about this? Also, I'm not an expert in this (at all) but can you provide the investigator with paper work pertaining to your lack of income from the properties, and your potential bankruptcy?

 

Also, if memory serves the rules about late payments are complicated, and it may or may not have affected your claim. If no one here can advise, I would google your local Welfare Rights (or failing that CAB) and discuss your whole situation with them. Welfare Rights tends to be very good with the rules surrounding claims, in my experience, as well as being quite experienced in alleged benefit fraud.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The properties you own and rent may if they had been declared to Income Support may have been disregarded for a certain period, of at least twenty six weeks.

 

If these properties are in negative equity, rented out and the mortgage covers that rent and you have no Income from them, then they may have been disregarded after a decision by an SDM for at least a period of twenty six weeks. If by any chance eldery relatives rents them off you they may be fully disregarded. It is alll looked into by the DM

 

If the DM had disregarded them then it would haveat again a been reviewed again after the twenty six weeks

So first of all you need to gather all the information on the properties, mortgage details, rental agreements to show this. I know you should have declared them at the off set but this now maybe the only thing you can do now

The officer may be coming around to collect these items.

I agreen you do need some legal advice

 

Also with regards to that £800, if its earnigs from a past period its counted as capital so shouldnt effect your I.S. issues

 

Your sons DLA and your CA will not be effected by this they are not means tested so you will have some Income.

 

I agre with Stan and see your Union about your work

Link to post
Share on other sites

No CA is not means tested, as the OP said she was on I.S I pressumed she and her husband werent working.

as the earnigs were for a past period before the I.S claim

but there are earning limits of £100 after tax etc....

 

Thinking now, the partner may have made the claim as a lone parent as he moved away into rented property how then did the OP get on the claim?

 

Unless the partner claimed CA and then claimed I.S on the grounds of it then the OP can be on the claim from the start

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies. I think we are just worrying as we have never been investigated for anything before. I think the Council/DWP are more concerned that the properties were not declared, as we naively thought they were in process of being repossesed. My hubby did tell the JC when he signed on, but was not asked to alter forms.

I think after our meeting with lawyer I will feel much better. Just feel an idiot!

 

Thanks for all your replies! Much appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Went to see lawyer, who was fantastic! She has put us at ease. She was so understanding, and told us that the Investigation is to intimadate us, and that they either have evidence or not, and relying on an elderly neighbour to say I still go to my old house is not enough!

 

Feeling positive!

Would definately recommend anyone who has a letter for investigation under caution to pay a lawyer a visit!

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

how many buy to let properties do you have? i am just concerned that they may consider you to be self employed

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We had 10, however all were being reposessed at the time we claimed benefits. And we were not receiving any income from them, we had no other income as I had been made redundant and had no redundancy. Will see what they decide............ think they were totally confused at the interview!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...