Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Speed Credit/NDR and now Marshall Hoarse - PLEASE HELP


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4301 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

not alot else i can do really. i will get onto oft regarding the fraud email. out of curiosity you was saying in court they can only request 8% interest. obviously if this went to court and i had to pay it back (i actully have the remainder of the original debt put aside for payment). but my question is as soon as i enter court will a ccj be marked against me or is it only if i dont make the payments ruled that i then receive the ccj. the ccj is my main concern you see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCj will only be marked against you if the court finds in favour of the claimant. You can contest other charges to the judge as long as you have complete proof they are unfair. Even if a judgement is awarded to the claimant, you have 30 days in which to pay the full amount of the stated judgement before the CCJ is registered against you.

 

Look at it this way, Overall, PDL's rarely win properly defended court cases. They rely 100% on judgement by default, and lack of knowledge by the debtor. If you ever do get a court claim from those muppets, we can easily help you with a defence. There are even a couple of admins on this site that know the court system inside and out that can give you amazing advice for a defence.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their collection email and their complaints are useless. They are manned by the same illiterate people that are on the phone lines.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

that email they sent is need sending to the oft too..

 

they are NOT bailiffs and NEVER EVER will be

 

and even IF [a ver big one]

 

they gain a judgement

 

there is NO WAY

 

it would eable 'them' to enter your property EVER!!

 

only a court bailiff can do that.

 

their point 2 needs highlighting to the OFT and everyone else

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

im going to send a detailed email to oft including full copies of messages received point 2 as you said and the anti fraud email address. so what should i do at this point should i message there collections email address or leave it and say i tried to reply to the anti fraud email address and there website is down.

 

it depends on how important the breakdown of charges is really - would you suggest i email on collections address or not. not sure it would be my responsibility to do that though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont reply to them. The more you play letter tennis, the more they will threaten you. Get that complaint in asap as the company is under deep investigation atm. Let the regulator sort it out.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly there webaites are now back up would you suggest i email via the site for the breakdown

 

Just sit back and wait and see what they do, mean while get that complaint to the OFT. Ive requested a full break down numberous.times of the £350 charge they play ignorant and never send me. Dont use those online boxes as you then dont have written proof of what you've sent. As for the collections email you cant email it because it doesnt accept emails they cant only send them out from it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Timeforachange

Your experience totally mirrors mine.

Definetely dispute all the the 'passing over to DCA charges' because I'll bet they didnt tell you that was happening. And all erroneous additional charges.

These guys were the ones that really scared me to begin with but they were actually ok once they realise you know your rights thanks to this forum.

Do not be bullied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i just conacted the OFT.

 

i advised the following points in a 3page email.

 

 

Things pointed out to the OFT.

1. Terms and conditions of the contract state a transmission fee of 4.90 is applied however they charged me 5.

2. On the contract they stating at day 98 (currently today) they state the amount owing is 268pounds with a charge of 350pounds applied totalling 618pounds however they are stating I owe 466pounds a clear misrepresentation of information.

3. Passed to NDR without any prior notification.

4. Email address does not work must use online form providing no proof of correspondence for the debtor.

5. The email stating they will return with bailiffs to seize goods.

6. Two emails in 7 days stating amount owed however the original debt amount changes (also the original debt amount was 100pounds)

Debt GBP 268

GBP 24

GBP 24

GBP 24

GBP 24

GBP 24

GBP 24

GBP 24

 

Repayments todate GBP 50

Total GBP 386

 

Then i received

Debt GBP 292

GBP 24

GBP 24

GBP 24

GBP 24

GBP 24

GBP 24

GBP 24

 

Repayments todate GBP 50

Total GBP 410

7. Antifraud email address suggesting there is fraud activity

8. there emails provide no response so no paper trail can be proven and i now refuse to contact them

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

ok so recent developments.

 

I have had a response from OFT saying they dont advise anyone pays nothing.

 

They also advised on the recent speedcredit closure while also informing me about them potentially selling the debt on.

 

They did however state that they may need to get in touch for further information due to the recent developments they have had with speedcredit.

 

Stella McCreary also got back to me advising shes sorry to hear about the circumstances and for my full address as she can only directly help in circumstances based in her area.

 

I have also now since had 2 more emails from Marshall Hoarse and again it has now increased by £24 so its now upto £424 in total.

 

Has anyone got any suggestions on what it is i should do now?

 

i have not paid anything since it went to marshall.

i have however paid £50 in total this far on the original £100 debt.

 

The breakdown again shows the original debt increased as per previously seems they cant be bothered to type another line

so they are just adding these extra £24 interest charges to the original debt in the breakdown.

 

As usual the correspondance for the 4th time says they will be visiting my property again

which im concerned about as i live with a housemate and i dont want them coming when im not there to get my housemate instead

and put them in an uncomfortable position.

Has anyone ever known them actully visit a property?

 

Also they state the debt has been sold to them (even though they are in the same building) can they continue to apply interest?

 

thanks

 

again just to recap.

 

i took out 100 or 148 with interest.

 

since i have paid £50

 

The balance is now £424.

 

Where do i go now?? im not sure what to do now they are just going to try and force charges down my neck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

reclaim all the PENALTY FEES

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a letter informing them that you will repay what you originally owed, explain when and how much you will pay, example: 30£ on the 1st of each month and that if they want even one penny more then they should take you to court.

 

However, they won't take you to court, why? its simple, as you have unfortunately experienced they add a lot of fantasy charges, once they take you to court they can't add any more fantasy charges, in other words, if they took you to court they may get a couple hundred, but if they stay out of court they hope to get thousands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...