Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Incorrect debt being collected


MrChall
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4282 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry if I post this in the wrong forum.

 

4 years ago I relocated to Asia. For this reason I sold my car and cancelled my insurance. I left £1600 on my Barclay's bank account.

In December 2011 I attempted to transfer £44.000 from Asia to my bank account, but the transfer failed. I couldn't figure out why.

I relocated back to UK in February only to find out that my account had been defaulted and closed. After some investigation it turned out that Tesco car insurance had opened a new direct debit against my account to insure a car I no longer owned. The £1600 had been spent on this.

 

As a result of this the £1600 was gone, and when the overdraft wasn't paid the account was closed. My Experian credit report was struck by a defaulted account with Barclays. The amount is £315

 

The dept has since been "sold" to a company by the name "Lowell Portfolio". Lowell didn't have my address since I was living in Asia, but that didn't stop them to register a defaulted account with Experian. The defaulted amount is £316. Lowell has also registered one more defaulted account with Experian, this amount is for £913

 

After talking with Lowell, I have announced my willingness to pay the incorrect alleged dept if they agree to remove the defaulted account from Experian, but they refuse to do this. I have also agreed to pay if they are able to provide details of the dept in question, but so far they have not been able to provide ANY details that shows exactly HOW this alleged dept occurred.

 

I don't have any financial difficulties or problems paying this dept, but I feel bad about paying something I shouldn't, especially since I am being penalised for it in my credit report.

 

Should I pursue this legally? How do I do that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if I post this in the wrong forum.

 

4 years ago I relocated to Asia. For this reason I sold my car and cancelled my insurance. I left £1600 on my Barclay's bank account.

In December 2011 I attempted to transfer £44.000 from Asia to my bank account, but the transfer failed. I couldn't figure out why.

I relocated back to UK in February only to find out that my account had been defaulted and closed. After some investigation it turned out that Tesco car insurance had opened a new direct debit against my account to insure a car I no longer owned. The £1600 had been spent on this.

 

As a result of this the £1600 was gone, and when the overdraft wasn't paid the account was closed. My Experian credit report was struck by a defaulted account with Barclays. The amount is £315

 

The dept has since been "sold" to a company by the name "Lowell Portfolio". Lowell didn't have my address since I was living in Asia, but that didn't stop them to register a defaulted account with Experian. The defaulted amount is £316. Lowell has also registered one more defaulted account with Experian, this amount is for £913

 

After talking with Lowell, I have announced my willingness to pay the incorrect alleged dept if they agree to remove the defaulted account from Experian, but they refuse to do this. I have also agreed to pay if they are able to provide details of the dept in question, but so far they have not been able to provide ANY details that shows exactly HOW this alleged dept occurred.

 

I don't have any financial difficulties or problems paying this dept, but I feel bad about paying something I shouldn't, especially since I am being penalised for it in my credit report.

 

Should I pursue this legally? How do I do that?

 

 

The debt is not yours technically if you cancelled the car insurance. Did you do this in writing? Did you copy in the bank? Why would you even be interested in paying a debt that you 'may' have not caused?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I tend to agree.

Unfortunately I didn't cancel in writing, I did this on the phone. However, at the time I canceled the insurance I required one more month of insurance. This was not possible, so I paid 3 months straight away. This money did NOT come out of my direct debit (I cancelled it, remember..)

 

In my opinion Barclay's owes me £1600, any clue as to what I do to claim the money back? Remember they have closed the account (no doubt in an attempt to wipe out the traces of their act, whatever it is called...).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first port of call is the insurance company, it will have been them that registered the default originally & once the insurance error has been corrected the default should be removed.

 

Did you cancel the insurance?

 

You may have to send the insurance company a SAR to get copies of letters, transcripts of 'phonecalls etc to back up the fact that the insurance was cancelled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you need to go back to the Tesco Car Insurance people and make a complaint. If you gave them instruction to cancel the policy from a certain date, then they should have arranged that. They may have a recording of the phone call or a system note to confirm the request. If this is the case, if you provide evidence of the Barclays overdraft charges and any other costs, Tesco Car Insurance will have to rebate you for these.

 

If you are unable to resolve with Tesco within 8 weeks, go to the FOS. Once a complaint is in progress, advise Lowell of this and they will need to put collection on hold. Under the OFT debt collection rules, Lowells would have to stop collection activity where the debt is subject to dispute.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

How common is it that a company agree to remove a credit report instance in case I agree to pay the alleged debt in full?

 

Currently, my credit report lists this as "Defaulted". What impact would it have on my credit report if I agree to pay (even though I don't want to and might not be legally responsible for the debt).

 

Anyone who knows?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you paid in full, the default would still be on there but would be noted as satisfied. It would take probably a year before any new creditors did not take issue with it and possibly up to 2 years for your credit rating to recover to the previous level. That is my understanding, but perhaps the people to ask are Experian.

 

Nb. Most debt companies/creditors would not remove the default. I am not sure it is allowed, unless there has been an error.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the default was added in error, then it will be removed. However, you need to start complaining and get accurate info in order for it to happen.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a reply from Barclays where they confirm that the direct debit was set up on the 30.07.2008, the problem is that I relocated out of the country in May 2008. The initial direct debit was set up in 2005, and when I cancelled the insurance Tesco apparently requested to set up a new direct debit with Barclays, and this was agreed by Barclays without notifying me.

 

How is it even possible that a bank like Barclays agree to set up a direct debit against a personal account without confirming this with the account holder? They treat this as if it was some sort of public property available to anyone in need of some cash.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some companies can reset the direct debit up if you cancelled it yourself through the bank and didnt tell the creditor.

 

However, if you did cancel it over the phone as you said, then it might be a good idea to request a SAR and demand they send all recorded conversations about you.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Direct Debit mandates are all electronic these days and banks don't always send any confirmation that they have been set up.

 

Both Tesco and Barclays will have records of the DDM's being cancelled and set up again.

 

For your information, at the time you had the Tesco policy, RBS Insurance administered the policy and DD's. Tesco have since changed to using Ageas. So it may be that RBS Insurance will have to deal with the complaint on behalf of Tesco, as it relates to a period where they dealt with your policy.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...