Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks very much, would just be reassuring to know I still have options at that point, and can avert anything nasty if needs be?  No idea what nasty would look like for me in regard to this but I worry about being done for fraud because I applied for the loans when I was not a UK resident and promptly transferred the funds abroad upon receipt.  Neither was allowed under the terms of the loan offer. Would they look into that sort of thing?  (Am I putting myself at risk admitting that here and should I delete this message, seeing as my gmail address is associated with this). I feel so ashamed admitting this.  As I mentioned in my first message, I was horribly manipulated into doing all of this and then scammed.  I fully intended to repay the loans and did my best to do so for over 2 years before my income took a massive hit in Oct last year.
    • no need to do anything before a letter of claim, then you can come here and we will help you. Most of these debts are sold on for a few pence in the pound to DCA's, who will try and make you think that they have legal powers. Ask yourself the question why so cheap?
    • Thanks, good to know.  Is it best to engage with them once court proceedings begin?  I've noticed advice on the thread saying ignore everything until Letter of Claim or notice of proceedings - so that suggests there is something I could do before/when that happens that is important? Would like to know what those actions/options are for me to take at that stage, to factor into my decision now weighing up the risks etc.
    • 6 years from date of DN/Last Payment to take you to court.   Further 6 years to enforce the CCJ.
    • Well I have none, so I think me telling them would be a proactive preventive step to "help" them weigh up whether to proceed with court action.  Doubt they would do so if they knew it was a waste of time because I own nothing they can send bailiffs to or put a charging order on.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell chasing 12 year old debt and claiming I made a £1 payment in 2008


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4333 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

I am hoping I can get some advice on Lowell.

 

They have been calling and texting me daily for a barclaycard debt from 2000. I am also getting letters from Red collection agency.

 

I sent them a prove it letter to which they sent me a credit agreement from 2000, I then sent them a statued barred letter.

 

Today I received a letter to say it is not statued barred as I made a £1 payment in 2008 and they will continue to chase for payment. II cannot recall making a payment as seems a strange amount.

 

Does anyone have any suggestions on what to do as the consent calls and texts are becoming unbearable

 

Thanks for reading

Has anyone got any

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

This is getting more and more common now where DCA's are applying this to trick the person that a payment has been made.

 

Lowell's have to supply you with proof that a payment has been made, copied and pasted below is a letter originally created by BrigadierJc2s...

 

Make a formal complaint to the Compliance Manager at Lowell.

 

Dear Sir or Madam

 

With reference to your letter regarding the alleged debt for xxxxxx

please not I do not acknowledge any debt to you or any company

you claim to represent.

I reject your claim that this alleged debt is NOT statute barred.

I therefore require you within 7 working days to provide strict proof

of the following matters regarding the alleged payment.

1. The exact date of the payment.

2. The method of payment, Debit/Credit card, Cheque, bank transfer ,cash.

3.If a cheque the Cheque number, the drawers name, the bank name and

sort code.

4. I any type of card the 16 digit card number, the expiry/issue dates, the name

of the card issuer and the 3 digit security code.

5.For any other method of payment a full explanation of the method of

payment to include bank transfer numbers and the account number and

drawers name.

Unless you provide the required evidence no further correspondence will

be entrered into.

 

****************************

 

Check your Credit file has not been trashed by Lowell's as well.

 

Red Debt Collection are also part of Lowell's, same as Hampton's Legal so don't worry about their useless pathetic threats.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to write to them and demand their evidence of this £1 payment.

 

You want to know the full details....where it came from, how it was paid, the name of the bank from which the payment was made....the full works.

 

It is not unknown for these people to come up with phantom payments.

 

Head your letter "I don not acknowledge any debt to your company or any other that you claim to represent"

 

Remember, it is for them to prove this is not SB and not for you to prove it is.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any suggestions on what to do as the consent calls and texts are becoming unbearable

 

Sorry, missed this bit out...

 

Include this template letter and amend to suit... http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?493-Harassment-by-telephone-response-letter

Include in the same envelope as the letter above.

 

When they ring again, simply say "in writing only" and hang up, refuse to go through any security questions.

Keep a record of all texts and time/dates of phone calls because these are important if it can be classed as harassment.

 

Just remember, Lowell's is a private company with no legal powers, they are not bailiffs!

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Today I received a letter to say it is not statued barred as I made a £1 payment in 2008 and they will continue to chase for payment. II cannot recall making a payment as seems a strange amount.

 

 

As they allege you paid £1 is it possible you made a CCA request at around that time? It's not unknown for DCAs to apply the £1 as a payment towards the alleged debt even though it is not intended for that purpose.

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

As they allege you paid £1 is it possible you made a CCA request at around that time? It's not unknown for DCAs to apply the £1 as a payment towards the alleged debt even though it is not intended for that purpose.

 

Rob

 

Yes, good point

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And of course make a very LOUD complaint to the OFT&TS via http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Dl1/Directories/UsefulContactsByCategory/Governmentcitizensandrightscontacts/DG_195948

This is not too dissimilar to what the banks have just been caught out doing, massaging interest rates to get business and drum up profits.

 

Technically FRAUD!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bear in mind that if you suspect Lowell of making a fraudulent claim of payment in order to gain financial advantage, that's a criminal offence. Just a thought for when you complain to the relevant organisations. They're already under investigation as to their fitness to hold a Consumer Credit License. Every little nail helps... ;)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, fraud by false representation would be a lovely criminal offence to use against them, not the first time they have done it either !!

 

As well as obtaining money by deception.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bear in mind that if you suspect Lowell of making a fraudulent claim of payment in order to gain financial advantage, that's a criminal offence. Just a thought for when you complain to the relevant organisations. They're already under investigation as to their fitness to hold a Consumer Credit License. Every little nail helps... ;)

 

I have a feeling I may have sent them a CCA request which would explain the £1 payment. Does anyone think it would be a good idea to request all data they have on file ie a subject access request to prove what the £1 payment was for?

 

Thanks for the replies everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a feeling I may have sent them a CCA request which would explain the £1 payment. Does anyone think it would be a good idea to request all data they have on file ie a subject access request to prove what the £1 payment was for?

 

Hi,

 

When you made the CCA request, did you include the reference of... "Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose" within the CCA letter that you sent?

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

In your first post you state the debt was from 2000, had you made payments up until 2008 because if you didn't it might have been statute barred by that point anyway depending on your last payment and once something is SB there's no restarting that clock even if you then make a further payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a feeling I may have sent them a CCA request which would explain the £1 payment. Does anyone think it would be a good idea to request all data they have on file ie a subject access request to prove what the £1 payment was for?

 

You would have them bang to rights IMO.

If they were tempted to pervert the course of justice by lying to a judge that the £ payment was not for the CCA but was for payment against the debt, then they would be laughed out of court and you would be able to sue for damages.

 

Everybody knows that the CCA costs £1, no-one in their right mind would pay £1 toward a debt of hundreds of pounds, it is absolutely ludicrous and these clowns are taking you for an uneducated moron, I personally would not be at all happy with their response, I would definitely be turning the thumb screws and having these eejitts answer to the OFT, TS and FOS.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

When you made the CCA request, did you include the reference of... "Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose" within the CCA letter that you sent?

 

Stigman

 

 

If I did send a letter I would of included that statement. I think I am going to write back to them to demand they detail the payment and how it was made. If it was a postal order then I know it would of been a CCA request. Thanks for your comments and I am going to complain to OFT too.

 

Interestingly they have stopped calling me and texting daily since they replied to my letter too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Always best to keep copies of all letters sent & received. I’ve done a few £1 cca requests (using third party cheque). Although it states not to be used for any other purpose some have used it to deduct the balance but come SB if they try that trick I keep a copy of the cheque details & letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...