Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • lookinforinfo
      VCS SpyCar PCN now Claim Form - No Stopping - Bristol Airport

      By lookinforinfo · Posted

      You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • NewsBot
      TikTok says cyber-attack hit brand and celebrity accounts

      By NewsBot · Posted

      The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • dx100uk
      VCS SpyCar PCN now Claim Form - No Stopping - Bristol Airport

      By dx100uk · Posted

      luckily like this thread VCS/DCB(L) PCN spycar capture - PAPLOC Now claimform - no Stopping in Restricted Zone - Bristol Airport ***Claim Dismissed*** - Page 4 - Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group although no on the crossing, same applies to you so WS time. there are numerous threads here on pedestrian crossing claimforms by VCS at Bristol and at other airports so use our enhanced google searchbox and find them. really a bad idea to vanish for SIX months and not been have reading up here.....................  
    • dx100uk
      VCS SPYCAR PCN Now PAPLOC - no stopping - Pedestrian Crossing - Bristol airport

      By dx100uk · Posted

      what happened? dx  
    • FTMDave
      VCS SpyCar PCN now Claim Form - No Stopping - Bristol Airport

      By FTMDave · Posted

      Not at all.  The onus is on them to ensure that their invoice respects the provisions of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to establish keeper liability.  Which it can't as the area is covered by bye-laws. Spot on. Irrelevant as to whether you entered into a contract with VCS to pay them £100 if you didn't obey what was written on their silly signs. Who cares?  What about their ridiculous generic Particulars of Claim where they deliberately mix up driver and keeper. And where do they mention this?  You haven't shown us anything. Of course you have to prepare a Witness Statement and you'd better get on with it. This is the problem here - you've disappeared for months & months, haven't kept us updated and presumably haven't read other VCS threads.  That needs to change - now. Otherwise you will lose - simple as that. For a start - please upload the court order which fixes the hearing date plus plus where "VCS mentioned my initial defence was generic and clearly copied from the internet".  We're not mind readers.

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Snooping by local government

sallypotter

By sallypotter
in Benefits and HMRC

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4348 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

jacob18

jacob18

Posted
Posted

As im sure you are aware Sally you are guilty now until you can prove innnocence , that is the way i see it. I am sure it will be because they were such large amounts , that is all i can think of and she has to prove that she was not being deceptive , as i am sure she wasn't , she needs legal advice , good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

DigitalProduct

DigitalProduct

Posted
Posted
I have frequent issues with my LA caused by my being a clerical ESA claim. I regularly have to go in to LA office with bank statements to prove income. They go through them with a fine toothed comb, question in depth, how I provide for myself and kids, and question me on every amount on my bank statements, both incomings and outgoings.

 

My point is, im entitled to the HB and CTB so am only too happy for them to do so. I don't care what they know I've spent my money on as at the end of the day, it's their duty to try to prevent fraud of any kind, and as I've nothing to hide (not saying your cousin has) I co-operate fully. This is what I HAVE to do do in order to keep my benefits, and I personally feel it's a very small price to pay, a pain at times, but it keeps a roof over my head, and for that, I'd go to almost any lengths the LA demand.

 

What happens when the LA don't do their job or even try to defraud the public?

Link to post
Share on other sites
antone

antone

Posted
Posted
What happens when the LA don't do their job or even try to defraud the public?

 

Do you have a particular case in mind? It's hard to answer those sorts of questions in general terms.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites
MIKEY DABODEE

MIKEY DABODEE

Posted
Posted
No she got £14k in total.

 

Declared this, then gave £9k in total to her kids and grandson.

 

I'm not getting anywhere here am i?

 

I'm sure this has all been explained previously.

 

Mike please if you are reading your advice.

 

As she told ESA now that she has 5k in capital or still paying tariff income on 14k.

 

I cant see why she would want to declare 14k, then gift 9K :(

 

Has she got a partner, or ex partner? did any of the money go to her own children wh maybe live with the ex partner,

LA have something in mind

Link to post
Share on other sites
antone

antone

Posted
Posted
As she told ESA now that she has 5k in capital or still paying tariff income on 14k.

 

I cant see why she would want to declare 14k, then gift 9K :(

 

Has she got a partner, or ex partner? did any of the money go to her own children wh maybe live with the ex partner,

LA have something in mind

 

These were my thoughts as well. If she's still paying tariff income on £14k, what's the angle here?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites
sallypotter

sallypotter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

She hasn't told ESA she gave some of the money to her children and grandchild.

 

What business is it of theirs, it is her money? She's not asking for more money from them, so what's the problem?

 

She's still paying tarif income on the inheritance of £14k.

 

This is our point, as far as ESA are concerned she has £14k and is being treated as such, so what is the problem, she's not asking for any more ESA!

Link to post
Share on other sites
sallypotter

sallypotter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Mike,

 

these are our thoughts that the LA have something in mind.

 

If they straightforward put it to her, then they might get an answer.

 

They are fishing and it is downright outrageous.

 

She declared the £14k as it was a change in circumstance.

 

She gave her kids and grandchild some money because that was her choice, why not?

Link to post
Share on other sites
debt4get

debt4get

Posted
Posted
She hasn't told ESA she gave some of the money to her children and grandchild.

 

What business is it of theirs, it is her money? She's not asking for more money from them, so what's the problem?

 

She's still paying tarif income on the inheritance of £14k.

 

This is our point, as far as ESA are concerned she has £14k and is being treated as such, so what is the problem, she's not asking for any more ESA!

i honestly think sally..that they are looking at deprivation of capital...this is why they are asking....understand that she is not claiming any more esa than she is entitled to... however, the hb are presumably concerned enough to ask where this money has gone...i think unfortunately you have two options...dont tell em and you will lose entitlement to hb...or tell em and they will make a decision on this basis....i dont think there is going to be any way to avoid this unless she is in a position to service the rent etc herself...wish you all the best...

Link to post
Share on other sites
sallypotter

sallypotter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks debt4get,

 

 

Been thinking about this (obviously) a lot.

 

Don't think LA have a leg to stand on in a court of law.

 

She's declared everything, they must have their reason/s why they want to know her expenditure, as she hasn't asked for any more ESA, but what who knows?

 

If it's deprivation of capital then this doesn't apply as she's not trying to get any more ESA.

 

If they want to interview her and charge her with something then she says let them because she feels they are acting beyond their powers.

 

Sorry but if she's not asking for more money then what right do they have?

 

All these flimsy suggestions that some people have given are nonsense.

 

LA are only ones that seem to know where they are coming from and you can't get an honest or straight answer from them.

 

Thanks though debt, she won't be claiming soon anyway it was only a temporary measure and not sure it was even worth it....

Link to post
Share on other sites
sallypotter

sallypotter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks again debt,

 

You know what makes me mad or even madder, lol?

 

It's CAB, posters etc. saying along the lines of "have you claimed all the benefits you are entitled to?" etc. etc.

 

Is it really worth it?

 

Seems it's just to get information on people that they can use against them when the time comes?

 

To control and have power over people.

 

I told my 27 year old son, never claim any benefits if you can help it. Fortunately, at the moment he doesn't need to. Hope that remains the case, i really do.

 

It's no wonder sensible people don't bother.

 

My cousin never would have claimed the hb if she hadn't been told by the CAB to, she was more than willing to use her inheritance but was told she was entitled to claim hb, so do it.

 

Look where that has got her?

 

Bye for now,

 

Sal

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest amianne

Guest amianne

Posted
Posted
Thanks again debt,

 

You know what makes me mad or even madder, lol?

 

It's CAB, posters etc. saying along the lines of "have you claimed all the benefits you are entitled to?" etc. etc.

 

Is it really worth it?

 

Seems it's just to get information on people that they can use against them when the time comes?

 

To control and have power over people.

 

I told my 27 year old son, never claim any benefits if you can help it. Fortunately, at the moment he doesn't need to. Hope that remains the case, i really do.

 

It's no wonder sensible people don't bother.

 

My cousin never would have claimed the hb if she hadn't been told by the CAB to, she was more than willing to use her inheritance but was told she was entitled to claim hb, so do it.

 

Look where that has got her?

 

Bye for now,

 

Sal

 

It happens all of the time. Getting bad advice, poor service.

 

I was reading of a elderly couple who were receiving Guaranteed Pension Credit, full Housing Benefit and full Council tax Benefit and had considerable savings - in excess of £75,000. Because of the way Pension Credit works, there is no need to tell them if your savings go up. The increase in capital is ignored. When they first claimed they had £2000, then received a large inheritance.

 

CAB told the chappie that he should be receiving IIDB. They applied for him and he was awarded about £60 a week. Unfortunately, because of this extra income, it took them over the limit for Pension Credit so they had to support themselves from then on. However, when they applied for HB & CTB, they were told that they couldn't get either due to savings.

 

The moral of that story is why claim an extra £60 a week when you stand to lose £185 a week from other benefits!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Slatted

Slatted

Posted
Posted
Thanks again debt,

 

You know what makes me mad or even madder, lol?

 

It's CAB, posters etc. saying along the lines of "have you claimed all the benefits you are entitled to?" etc. etc.

 

Is it really worth it?

 

Seems it's just to get information on people that they can use against them when the time comes?

 

To control and have power over people.

 

I told my 27 year old son, never claim any benefits if you can help it. Fortunately, at the moment he doesn't need to. Hope that remains the case, i really do.

 

It's no wonder sensible people don't bother.

 

My cousin never would have claimed the hb if she hadn't been told by the CAB to, she was more than willing to use her inheritance but was told she was entitled to claim hb, so do it.

 

Look where that has got her?

 

Bye for now,

 

Sal

 

I think the CAB should suggest she get what she is entitled to (in fact it would be unreasonable that they do not do so) and many people really do need to know and claim it all to survive so how could they make distinctions?

 

To me it seems that the problem is the level of scrutiny that is now being required in order to satisfy those responsible for paying out the benefits that is the issue here is it not?

 

It is uncomfortable to be asked for so much information, that is for sure, and I can understand how it can feel worse when emotive issues surround it as well as mental health ones.:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites
MIKEY DABODEE

MIKEY DABODEE

Posted
Posted
Mike,

 

these are our thoughts that the LA have something in mind.

 

If they straightforward put it to her, then they might get an answer.

 

They are fishing and it is downright outrageous.

 

She declared the £14k as it was a change in circumstance.

 

She gave her kids and grandchild some money because that was her choice, why not?

 

The LA think they have or have uncovered something,

I am at a loss, if she has declared 14k to ESA,

 

paying tariff Income then HB should accept this,

but I think, they think there is more capital, that would take her over hte 16k because it seems they dont want to pay HB..

 

she could have just given the money to the children and just declared what was left, she didnt but it looks like the LA doesnt want to accept this.

She may just have to wait now to see what they come out with next....

Link to post
Share on other sites
sallypotter

sallypotter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

They think she had an interest in another property, which they know she hasn't, the woman told her this on the phone.

 

This was told to them by one of the other beneficiaries.

 

They know she hasn't received anything from the sale of the house she part inherited to date.

 

We can only conclude it is one of the other beneficiaries making up stories as he has been doing this for several years trying to get her in to trouble.

Link to post
Share on other sites
debt4get

debt4get

Posted
Posted

it does if you look at their mindset....they claim she may have an interest in another property..therefore the money could be going into that property..maybe on maintenance in order to sell etc.....as much as i understand both yours and her position...in order to get them 'off your back' would it maybe not in her interest to give them the information...but i perfectly understand if you do not want to go down that route...the bloody cheek of it is unbelievable!! but unfortunately that is the system today...good luck!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
sallypotter

sallypotter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The woman has looked at what they thought/HAD TO HAVE BEEN TOLD was her interest in the other property and realised that she doesn't have any interest.

 

So that doesn't exist.

 

You are absolutely right "the bloody cheek of it is unbelievable!"

Link to post
Share on other sites
jacob18

jacob18

Posted
Posted

I have decided even though maybe unintentionally doing anything that they may deem as deceptive , that they will make me pay somewhere along the line , if they cant do it , they will just make life as hard as possible in every way , i wish you much luck and success !

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...