Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The "grief tech" firms helping users create talking avatars of their dead relatives.View the full article
    • I do disagree with you regarding one thing - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake. So far you have stood up to Excel and their threats, immediately given us the information in the sticky, done loads of reading up to educate yourselves, learnt from the mistake of outing the driver so you'll know not to do so in the future, got on to the organ grinder to try to get them to call off their dogs, etc., etc.  Good grief - we wish everyone who came here would do this!!! Most people who get these invoices sadly think they have been fined and if they don't pay a drone from Ukraine will be diverted and will fall on their home (or some such vague grand apocalyptic threat) and they fold and give in.  You haven't.  Well done. Don't worry - you won't be paying a penny.  Although it will take some time to see off this vile company.
    • Spot on!  You learn quickly. Who cares if the case gets sent to debt collectors?  They have no powers.  All the effort you will have to put in will be to open envelopes - and then spend time laughing at their daft "threats".  No stress at all!
    • I did ask them why, but seems they have more spare cash than we do .. ;-( .. I doubt their bank would even support a chargeback after a year has passed. Anyway I've constructed my first DRAFT Snotty Letter .. so here goes ..   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you had added. Shall we raise that related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding the ANPR entry / exit periods compared with actual valid parking periods. Especially with no consideration of the legally allowed grace periods and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the issues with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture more useless ANPR photos. We will of course be requesting “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Legal Counsel on behalf of the Vehicle Keeper.  
    • Hi,t I'm not sure if I'm posting in the right subsection but General Retail appears to be the closest to it I think... About a year and a half ago I got a new phone so I listed my iPhone 10 on eBay.  The listed stated 'UK only' and 'no returns accepted'. Considering I had had the phone for about 4 years, I myself was amazed that I had kept it in such good condition all that time - apart from being slightly scuffed around the charging port there was absolutely nothing wrong with it. It had the original box, its unopened original Apple cable, plug, and earbuds, and I threw in a case for it and It had always had a screen protector on it. Someone wanted it from Armenia, and I stupidly agreed to it.  She paid and I sent it off, fully insured. Not long after she received it, she sent a message saying it 'was not as described', so I asked to see photos of whatever was the problem.  She sent two photographs of the box.  Just the box.  I said I wasn't even going to consider refunding her unless she told me what she meant by 'not as described'.  I thought, if it's been damaged in transit, then it would be covered by the insurance. Anyway, she didn't respond at all, even though I had messaged her several times, so she opened a case with eBay. I have sold a fair few things of mine on eBay in the past buy had never had had anyone come back to me asking for a refund.  I got in touch with eBay several times by phone and by email, and found out they always side with the buyer, no matter what with their 'eBay Seller Guarantee'.  She had been told she could keep the phone and told me they would recover the money from me from my account blah blah.  So I unlinked all of my cards etc and changed my bank account to one that I never use with no money in it. My account got suspended.  I continued to try to explain to eBay that I had been scammed but I got nowhere. My account was permanently inaccessible by this point. I reported the phone stolen and the IMEI blacklisted but I'm not sure if that would make any difference being in Armenia, but it was all I could think of to piss the buyer off. A couple of months later I was contacted by email by a debt recovery company (I can' remember who now), to whom I explained I will not discuss the matter with them until I had received an SAR I had requested from eBay. As I could no longer access my account, I couldn't review the communication I needed to show I was not in the wrong. The SAR was produced but I was advised that the information I was looking for would not be included but I said I wanted it anyway.  There were so many codes etc. and hoops to jump through to access it, that even after trying whilst on the phone to them, I still couldn't get into it, so I never got to see it in the end.  I think they said they would send the code by post but they never did and I forgot about it after a while. I've just come across a couple of emails from Moorgroup, asking me to phone them to discuss a private matter regarding eBay.  I haven't replied or done anything at all yet.  The amount they are trying to recover from me is £200ish from what I remember. I know it's not that much but I don't want to pay the b*astards on general principle. I've had a lot of useful advice from CAG in the past about debt collectors but it has always been about being chased by creditors, I've never been in this situation before. I don't know what power they legally have to recover the 'debt', and most importantly, I am two years into a DRO, and the last thing I want is another CCJ to shake off if I'm cutting my nose off to spite my face.   Any advice gratefully received!!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SD from Lowells via Hampton Legal for CAP1 card debt - HELP!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4227 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

just recieved this from USA and thought it may give everyone a laugh on here..............

 

 

Cancel your credit card before you die.

 

Be sure and cancel your credit cards before you die! This is so

priceless, and so easy to see happening , customer service being what

it is today.

 

A lady died this past January, and Citibank billed her for February and

March for their annual service charges on her credit card, and added

late fees and interest on the monthly charge. The balance had been

$0.00 when she died, but now somewhere around $60.00. A family member

placed a call to Citibank.

 

Here is the exchange :

 

Family Member: 'I am calling to tell you she died back in January.'

 

Citibank : 'The account was never closed and the late fees and charges

still apply.'

 

Family Member : 'Maybe you should turn it over to collections.'

 

Citibank : 'Since it is two months past due, it already has been.'

 

Family Member : 'So, what will they do when they find out she is dead?'

 

Citibank : 'Either report her account to frauds division or report her

to the credit bureau, maybe both!'

 

Family Member : 'Do you think God will be mad at her? '

 

Citibank: 'Excuse me?'

 

Family Member: 'Did you just get what I was telling you - the

part about her being dead?'

 

Citibank : 'Sir, you'll have to speak to my supervisor.'

 

Supervisor gets on the phone:

 

Family Member : 'I'm calling to tell you, she died back in January with

a $0 balance.'

 

Citibank : 'The account was never closed and late fees and charges

still apply.'

 

Family Member : 'You mean you want to collect from her estate?'

 

Citibank : (Stammer) 'Are you her lawyer?'

 

Family Member : 'No, I'm her great nephew.' (Lawyer info was given)

 

Citibank: 'Could you fax us a certificate of death?'

 

Family Member : 'Sure.' (Fax number was given)

 

After they get the fax :

 

Citibank : 'Our system just isn't setup for death. I don't know what

more I can do to help.'

 

Family Member : 'Well, if you figure it out, great! If not, you could

just keep billing her. She won't care.'

 

Citibank: 'Well, the late fees and charges will still apply.'

 

(What is wrong with these people?!?)

 

Family Member : 'Would you like her new billing address?'

 

Citibank : 'That might help....'

 

Family Member : ' Odessa Memorial Cemetery , Highway 129, Plot Number

69.'

 

Citibank : 'Sir, that's a cemetery!'

 

Family Member : 'And what do you do with dead people on your planet???'

 

(Priceless!!)

 

And you wondered why Citibank needed help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Should have given them Gods address. Somewhere in the US mid west.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CAG

Just recieved reply to my SAR from capone.Cannot review my request as my signature does not match their records.I DID NOT SIGN IT YOU MORON!!!!

They want me to send a copy of d/licence or passport, and say the 40 day time limit does not start to run "UNTIL WE RECIEVE THE CORRECT DOCUMENTATION". All this does is make me want to be as irritating and irksome as they are,but I dont want to sink to the level of these **** sucking pond lifes, so advice would be appreciated,as usual!

Also got a court date for 26/10/12,any advice on what papers I need to prepare?

Thanks in anticipation....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Delaying tactic why they try to rustle some data from anywhere, respond and state that the date still runs from your initial request and you now have xx days left to comply.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Andy

the 40 days ran out on 7th August........

Have sent a recorded delivery letter asking for the requested information immediately....I wont hold my breath!!!

Edited by bluekooga
Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have advised that you would bring their reluctance to supply information to the Court..

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi citizenB

Would it be too late to mention it in court? Was hoping to mention a few things when in court,or does it not work that way?

 

I dont see any reason why you cant mention that you have been disadvantaged by their prevarication in supplying information.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi 42man

 

Today received reply to my second subject access request under data protection act 1998........"as we have previously advised you,we are unable to review your request as the signature you provided us with did not match our records.Under DPA 1998 sect 7 subsection 3a we are obliged to verify the identity of each requestor.I apologise if this is causing you any inconvenience.

As you will appreciate,we owe our customers duty of confidentiality and therefore we are unable to disclose personal information unless we can confirm receipt of an appropriate form of authority.We feel this is a reasonable request and that it is a necessary,basic requirement in order to avoid a breach of regulatory and data protection duties owed to our customers.

In order foor us to provide you with the requested information,please write to me again together with a copy of your signature or a copy of documentsshowing your current signature(this could be a driving licence or passport) at this address

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxx

xxxxx

NG2 3HX

We acknowledge receipt of a £10 fee required by the DPA1998

Please note that the 40 day time limitto provide you with the SAR does not start to run until we receive the correct documentation

 

Liam Quegan

Head of Executive response Centre

 

 

This all seems like infantile tit for tat,is there any thing that can be done to get them to release the information as originally requested,or do I have to jump through their hoops?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should drop them a line (recorded) explain that they have always sent their statements / letters to your address for X years. they can ask you for your signature but I would put lines through it. Enclose a copy of your passport or driving licence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could point out at the same time that it is an offence to copy a driving licence or Passport in this country !! Although I would assume it is the same in the USA !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the ICO's web page (for businesses)

 

http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_organisations/data_protection/the_guide/principle_6/access_to_personal_data.aspx

 

Can I ask for more information before responding to a subject access request?

The Act allows you to confirm two things before you are obliged to respond to a request.

First, you can ask for enough information to judge whether the person making the request is the individual to whom the personal data relates. This is to avoid personal data about one individual being sent to another, accidentally or as a result of deception.

The key point is that you must be reasonable about what you ask for. You should not request lots more information if the identity of the person making the request is obvious to you. This is particularly the case, for example, when you have an ongoing relationship with the individual.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi CAG, just got sar reply after two x of asking. 3months!!! Agreement taken out in 2004 with Capone,stating I was self employed,but does the fact it was taken out prior to 2005 FSA rules mean I cannot claim?

Thanks in advance for any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CAG, just got sar reply after two x of asking. 3months!!! Agreement taken out in 2004 with Capone,stating I was self employed,but does the fact it was taken out prior to 2005 FSA rules mean I cannot claim?

Thanks in advance for any advice

 

PPI claim back ? Yes I cannot see any reason why not. Remember that some threads are several pages long, so be specific about what you are looking at. PPI, Charges.

 

What is the score with debt collection on this one ?

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/consumerinformation/product_news/insurance/payment_protection_insurance_/claim-back-ppi

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Uncle bulgaria

Statutory demand for bankruptcy issued by Howells/capone etc, have applied to have this set aside but have been requesting information from them for the last 3 months and,surprisingly they have been nothing but obstructive.Small piece of info recieved on Sat after 3 months, but dont help me much as I am in court for the hearing tomorrow

Link to post
Share on other sites

should be in a room (chambers) with you and them across a table. judge in the middle. present your reasons for set aside with any evidence, as per your form/statement etc. they'll try to object and question, you can then rebut anything they say. mention any of their failures to comply with rules etc. judge will do his/her bit, prompt/question etc. remind that needed sar incomplete. cca request outstanding? at beginning, remind judge you are litigant in person. take a copy of particular docs. if set aside, ask for your costs as LinP (could prepare a costs schedule prior). they may approach you at court prior to hearing to try to settle/negotiate. haven't read thread, so excuse if anything wide.

counterclaim/set off re ppi etc? mention that

some info 'Where the debtor (a) claims to have a counterclaim, set-off or cross demand (whether or not he could have raised it in the action in which the judgment or order was obtained) which equals or exceeds the amount of the debt or debts specified in the statutory demand or (b) disputes the debt (not being a debt subject to a judgment, order, liability order, costs certificate or tax assessment) the court will normally set aside the statutory demand if, in its opinion, on the evidence there is a genuine triable issue.' Insolvency Pract Direction 13.4.4

some further info also http://www.bis.gov.uk/insolvency/Publications

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

ps, just noticed is this re a judgment debt? in which case, would need to rely on a) above rather than b) which would be n/a as there is a judgment?

 

if so, have you applied to get the judgment setaside?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...