Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pcso powers and name and address


jacobina
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4338 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was making a return in a well known high st store with a valid receipt.

When the transaction was closing the assistant advised that I would be reimbursed with credit vouchers as that is how I had paid originally.

I said I'd paid by credit card so questioned the receipt.

 

The item was cancelled off the system and taken with the receipt

(which now has the item crossed thru as part of the refund process)

to the manager who delayed matters for about 30mins before appearing to explain as I had paid by credit vouchers I would have to accept cv's.

I explained that I had originally paid by credit card but then exchanged the item for the item I now have

and in the production of the new receipt it was saying i had paid by cvs when in actual fact it was an exchange.

 

After a further delay of at least another 20mins whilst the manager disappeared again I said I couldn't wait any longer

and by mutual agreement with the assistant present said I would find the transaction on the credit card statement and come back.

 

I took the item with me and left my name and telephone no for the manager as he still had the receipt and asked for his name as a reference for my return.

 

It eventually nievely occurred to me that the delays were deliberate so as to involve a pcso....

 

About 15mins later I exited another shop to be confronted by a pcso who wanted a word re fraud!

He had the store detective with him.

 

I spent another 30mins explaining the circumstances , I was accussed of not having a receipt which was apparently the basis for the pcso questioning me.

By this time a runner' was back and forth to the store and he came back with my receipt which showed the items crossed through...

So, it now looks like I have no valid receipt!

 

The pcso eventually let me go on my way, but not before taking my name and address.

Does he have a right to this?

 

If so, what happens to my details within the police system?

 

I intend to go back to the store, but should I also put a complaint in writing or will it make matters worse?

 

I Would really appreciate some advice

Edited by jacobina
Link to post
Share on other sites

My view on these plastic police is somewhat one sided!

I don't even give my personal details to the official police, least of all some unqualified member of the public in fancy dress who hasn't sworn an oath to the Queen.

 

It's done now, so pointless fretting about it, a complaint to the store manager would be my first action, and if this is a well know high street company then all the better as I doubt they would want bad publicity.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My view on these plastic police is somewhat one sided!

I don't even give my personal details to the official police, least of all some unqualified member of the public in fancy dress who hasn't sworn an oath to the Queen.

 

It's done now, so pointless fretting about it, a complaint to the store manager would be my first action, and if this is a well know high street company then all the better as I doubt they would want bad publicity.

 

I think that's pretty harsh given the fact they have to do their training like Police Officers do, though the content is different. They do not hold the office of constable so do not need to take an oath, otherwise they would be Police Officers.

 

Anyway, back on topic. I believe your issue should be with the store and its manager not the PCSO. It would have been the managerexplaining the facts to the PCSO who in turn has to act and did so by requiring your name and address. You did the right thing providing your name and address otherwise it could have dragged on a lot longer and ended in them detaining you for the 30 mins until a police officer arrived.

 

If i was you id complain to the stores' head office as the manager appears a joke

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd focus on the issue, with the store.

 

I work alongside PCSOs, they were obviously called by the store to assist. They asked you for your details, you cooperated with them and provided them. As previous poster says, you done the right thing. The PCSOs could have detained you (for I believe 30 minutes) and called for a regular PC to attend and take details.

 

Chances are, your details will remain in the PCSOs pocket note book and nothing more will cone of this!

 

Sad that the store treated you like this. I'd definitely concentrate on complaining to head office about this incident.

It never rains but it pours...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we have the name of the store please

 

Marks & Spencer! The store manager has apologised unconditionally and is internally looking into it, however I am going to put this formally in writing to them as it has caused a great deal of stress and I feel very aggrieved. I want to know who is responsible for erroneous information resulting in me being accussed of fraud.....

 

Any other help always gratefully received.

 

JacobinaPcso's

Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't an ordinary breach of human rights, this is an M&S breach of human rights!

 

Definitely get this put in writing to them, and don't let it drop until you are satisfied with the outcome.

 

Your local paper might run a story on this too, in your letter of complaint ask for the area managers details, and inform the store manager that if this isn't resolved within 8 weeks you will escalate it to the area manager to deal with.

 

If you have the PCSO's details lodge a formal complaint with whatever station he was working out of.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Have to agree with Bazooka Boo on this that M&S breached your human rights by the Store Managers Actions who is employed by M&S.

 

1. The Store Manager without informing you accused you of Fraud and would have called the Police who inturn deployed a PCSO to deal with this.

 

2. The Store Manager untilmately works for M&S so M&S are responsible for there employees actions.

 

3. This situation arose due to the incompetence of the M&S Staff that dealt with the Refund Transaction and returned your reciept after the refund with the incorrect information on that reciept. If the reciept had been correctly dealt with as per M&S Refund Policy your issue would never have happened.

 

NOTE: If the refund and the fraud allegation were done at the same store this then raises the issue of the competence of the Management of that store due to two incidents within a short period at the same store and one of those incidents M&S accusing you of fraud due to their complete incompetence.

 

If you are going to complain make sure everything is in writing (always keep a paper trail especially with what they accused you off) and if you do write to the store always CC the document to M&S Head Office and also forward a copy to them.

 

Also ask for copies of the following document:

 

1. Refund Policy and Procedure.

2. M&S Equality Policy and Procedure.

3. Complaint Policy and Procedure.

4. Fraud Policy and Procedure.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

thank you all. I have written letters of CEO at M & S and Professional Standards at Essex Police. I have had acknowledgements from both and am waiting for the many questions to both organisations to be answered.

 

Thankyou stu007, I will ask for those documents after I have received the responses. Hadn't thought of that!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a move in the right direction at least, who knows you may even get some gift vouchers from M&S by way of an apology?

Especially if they want to keep it out of the papers.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...