Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
    • you made it very confusing, though i doubt any of it was ever read by the delivery franchise for DPD. your saving grace might well be you didn't select your own address (though if you are all the same postcode..??) and neither mentioned a safe space other than another neighbour. but with the actual delivery address on the parcel, it appears the driver had a choice of 3 addresses, all under the same post code with differing house numbers. so chose the label one but left it on your doorstep. play it carefully and along with the photo and the retailers requirement you should be ok.   dx  
    • Are Resident car parks subject to Planning permission under Town and Country Planning {control of Advertisements ] Regulations? SCHEDULE 1CLASSES OF ADVERTISEMENT TO WHICH PARTS 2 AND 3 DO NOT APPLY Class A "1.  The advertisement is not readily visible from outside the enclosed land or from any place to which the public have a right of access." As a private residential site does the public have a right of access? This particular Act has so many caveats that even many Councils do not understand it and that includes me. Though I do understand it better than many council planning departments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA Reassessment????


Dilizjo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4109 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:Hello Dilizjo:

 

Sadly, the response from what Shatos euphemistically describe as their 'customer relations' is entirely believable.

 

Mr Manager's talking twaddle and clearly hasn't read;

 

ESA Filework Guidelines Version 7 dated 1 June 2012

(Those in need of a cure for chronic insomnia should Google MED-ESAFWG~001)

 

Preferred evidence for a pinocchio doing re-referral scrutiny is a previous ESA85/85A but they have a wealth of other evidence available to them. In summary:

 

Controversially, the Medical Services Referral System still holds almost all of the filework outputs, IB/ESA85s, and IB/ESA85As, that have been produced electronically by Shatos since 2006. The system also holds a record of telephone conversations between Shatos and a claimant's doctors.

 

In the ESA55 (outer file for the paperwork);

An ESA50, unless Shatos've lost it or it's a mental health case.

Further medical evidence. All those lettters and reports that Shatos somehow manage to separate from an ESA50, like the one from your general practioner!

 

Tis true that Shatos no longer routinely see revised Jobcentreplus decisions or upheld tribunal decisions so, for anyone who has one, it's worth sending a copy (not the original) with the ESA50 and hoping Shatos don't lose it.

 

Now, do you happen to have a fax machine :?: Sitting under the stairs, next to your dual deck compact disc recorder :?:

 

:wave: Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

A good update folks:-D

 

After many attempts to fax the further medical evidence through to ATOS and failing... we scanned it and sent it by email this morning, I also included with the covering email that the customer relations manager had told me that my file had not been scrutinised in Nov/Dec.

 

I have just picked up a message on my answer machine from ATOS asking me to ring them, which I have just done and she has told me that she forwarded my email to the head of scrutiny who has decided that on consideration of my GP letter that we had just sent I did not need to have a face to face assessment and that I would hear from the DWP soon.:!:

 

So my 10 month battle about having a recorded face to face assessment is over till I find out what group the DWP put me in...... I wait with bated breath....

 

Thank you to all that have supported me and my rantings through this:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Hello Dianne:

 

Shall resist the temptation to ask why Shatos didn't send your file for re-referral scrutiny last November!

 

Really pleased for you that the first part of your current battle with DWATO's finally over. And I'm slowly turning :sick: with envy.

 

Hope you're soon off the extra meds, best wishes, Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Feeling really good today folk:) have just learnt that I have been put in the support group for 3 years. So my battle with ATOS has ended for now:whoo:

Once again everyone thankyou for your support and advice over the last 10 months, it has been invaluable:clap2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Hiya Dianne:

 

Margaret just turned completely :sick:.

Err...... :cheer2:

 

That you've finally landed your entitlement, although I'm sure you'd rather not need it.

 

Going back to #159 you won't be due any arrears. Supersession decisions after routine reassessments are effective from the date of the decision. However, if your award's income based you'll get the enhanced disability premium. Think it's £14ish a week.

 

Best wishes for a speedy recovery from Shatos.

 

Sincerely, Margaret. :wave:

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read your Thread Dilizjo. Thats great news. Well done you for putting your foot down.

 

Does anyone know if its true that for the PIP medicals, we're allowed to record them as long as the method of recording uses a tape or Video.

 

According to the DWP the regs for recording PIP are the same as for ESA

Taking a poke at the world

 

Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...