Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeah I figured, unlikely I'll need credit anyway mortgage all paid off etc so I'll take that on the chin and learn from the experience. Probably would've beaten that too had I remembered the protocol, first time ever going through the process though sob it wasn't familiar to me  Oh well  
    • This is my slightly amended WS taking on board your previous comments, any suggestions for amendments would be most appreciated.  Thank you for you time.   1.        I am the Defendant in this matter. 2.        The facts in this statement come from my personal knowledge. 3.        I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020. 4.        The alleged Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address. 5.        The Judgement debt was not familiar to me so I began investigations to ascertain what the debt related to and how such a figure had been equated in any event. 6.        I made immediate contact with the Court, the Claimant Solicitors and the Claimants thereafter, asking them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.  7.        I sent a Data Subject access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided – See appendix 1 which details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclaycard as well as copies of correspondence between us. 8.        I do not admit to entering an agreement with Barclaycard in 2000. 9.       The claimant has failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis and therefore this claim should be automatically struck out.  10.    The claimants have failed to disclose a true executed copy of the original agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim. They are not entitled to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974 12.   The reconstituted standard Barclaycard agreement that the claimant has included in the court bundle does not satisfy any CCA request and so the claimant is and remains in default of my CCA request and therefore unable to enforce the alleged agreement. 13.  The claimants have failed to provide proof the assignment, such as a deed of assignment. 14.  The claimant has failed to provide a statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement 15.   Despite numerous requests to the claimant, I have still not seen any evidence, such as an original agreement or deed of assignment, that substantiates the claimant’s assertion that I owe the debt to the claimant, nor evidence of how the debt was accrued. 16.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
    • A set aside application costs £275 which is more than the judgement so not worth it. Not that they would grant a set aside anyway.  Set asides are granted, for example, to people who moved and didn't get the court papers, so have a genuine reason for not defending.  Forgetting doesn't count. Your only choices are to pay up within 30 days, or defy the court and not pay.  If the latter, we've never seen a PPC enforce judgement for a single ticket, ever, you would get away without paying - but you would have a CCJ and a knackered credit file for six years.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Another Andrew Hart/Pay day over draft - nightmare


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2846 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The contact charges are outrageous, counter each one with one of your own, and £400 for court costs is steep, I don't think an eviction costs that much!

 

I hope you get that charge list over to the OFT and Trading Standards, this guy is on another planet.

 

If he is stating contractual interest he cannot charge at the contract rate once it has defaulted - if anything that charge should be 8% per annum....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 143
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

But he's a "fair and responsible lender"! :lol:

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

But he's a "fair and responsible lender"! :lol:

 

Only in his opinion !

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can easily be deleted from his feed unfortunatly.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not wise you do anything, as it can be construed as harassment against a person. you might think he's doing it to other people but technically he's representing a company so he can say the company advised him to contact debtors.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Mine went through court and unfortunately I got stumpted with the entire bill!! Wish I had of come on here first before doing that but all I wanted was him and that company off my back.. I have been paying the money each month I am not out of agreement with my court order and got another unsolicited phone call off someone from there yesterday wanting to send an attachment of earnings order!! What the hell!, I am in an agreement and I havent breached it either, the agreement started in in April, I paid it early in april he called work wanting to send an AOE and then it went to court, they agreed that that was the case and that I hadnt breached it and then I have not missed a payment since last one I made was 18th July (which is 2 days early) and I have had a call at work yesterday??? is the harassment ever going to stop because I have had enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine went through court and unfortunately I got stumpted with the entire bill!! Wish I had of come on here first before doing that but all I wanted was him and that company off my back.. I have been paying the money each month I am not out of agreement with my court order and got another unsolicited phone calllink3.gif off someone from there yesterday wanting to send an attachment of earnings order!! What the hell!, I am in an agreement and I havent breached it either, the agreement started in in April, I paid it early in april he called work wanting to send an AOE and then it went to court, they agreed that that was the case and that I hadnt breached it and then I have not missed a payment since last one I made was 18th July (which is 2 days early) and I have had a call at work yesterday??? is the harassment ever going to stop because I have had enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You MUST get to the court and tell them that the idiot is trying to make a mockery of the courts instructions. He is also NOT allowed to call you at work. You MUST contact the court about this.

Edited by renegadeimp

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Written complaint to the Court Manager may also be worth going in yourself and speaking to someone.

 

Also make sure that you document all this fully and send to OFT - urgently! Also contact your local Trading Standards regarding the harassment by Hart who should report it to his TS - not sure how the system works now but this is the link

 

http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk/advice/index.cfm

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is severe harrassment affecting your day to day life

 

Get an injunction against him - this has just gone too far. sorry Im no legal advisor but maybe someone could advise you about an injuction.

 

Report to the police again

Have you reported him yet to OFT and FOS? -do it NOw if not.

 

You have done nothing wrong, he is making mega bucks out of you -what an absolute A*******

 

HE MUST BE STOPPED

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I read this thread with much interest as was in a similar position myself with Mr. Andrew Harts company WPPL Ltd trading as doshloans.com

 

For those of you not aware finally he had his wings clipped but not enough in my opinion. (Please see attached)

 

Anyway what is interesting is that one of his former employees, someone calling themselves Bradley Belloni has been approaching ex clients of doshloans.com aka WPPL Ltd and making fresh loans.

 

 

THIS IS BREAKING THE LAW AS THE FCA HAVE IMPOSED A RESTRICTION PREVENTING HART AND HIS ASSOSIATED COMPANIES MAKING NEW LOANS.

 

They issue these new loans without clients even having to sign agreements.

 

Belloni then uses the leverage of intimidation by calling people at work with the threats illustrated on this forum to ensure repayment.

 

Could anyone with experience of this please contact:

 

 

Tim Grace

Intelligence Researcher

England Illegal Money Lending Team

PO Box 12971

B33 3BD

 

Tel - 0121 464 4696

 

Stop Loan Sharks Hotline (24 hour) 0300 555 2222

 

 

 

 

It maybe that Hart has no idea one of his ex stoogies is doing this, but considering his chequered past, well, anything is possible.

 

 

Thanks

 

 

Lucy

Edited by lucylats
Link to post
Share on other sites

this thread is 2 yrs+ old

 

you need to start a new thread

 

of your own.

 

you wont get seen here.

 

dx

 

thread closed to stop further out of date posts.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
Link to post
Share on other sites

WPPL is a consumer credit firm that provides payday loans (a form of high-cost short-term credit) under the trading names 'Payday Overdraft', ‘Wagepayday’ and ‘Doshloans’. Mr Hart is the sole director, controller and ultimate owner of WPPL.

Mr Hart and WPPL dispute the FCA’s decisions and have referred their cases to the Upper Tribunal (the Tribunal). Accordingly, the findings in these Decision Notices are provisional pending the Tribunal’s determination of Mr Hart and WPPL’s references. In relation to the FCA’s decisions to prohibit Mr Hart from any regulated role and cancel WPPL’s interim permission, the Tribunal will determine whether to dismiss the reference or remit it to the FCA with a direction to reconsider and reach a decision in accordance with the findings of the Tribunal. The Tribunal’s decisions will be published on its website.

Mr Hart

 

The FCA has found that Mr Hart is not a fit and proper person because he lacks integrity and competence. In the FCA’s view, between 1 April 2014 and 28 August 2014, he took a reckless approach to managing WPPL and to complying with regulatory requirements. Mr Hart recklessly contributed to and failed to address unfair business practices carried on by WPPL.

Mr Hart failed to take reasonable steps to implement appropriate policies and procedures relating to creditworthiness, affordability and forbearance. He also failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that WPPL had appropriate systems in place to communicate with customers, to ensure that customer complaints were dealt with adequately, to provide proper oversight of WPPL’s staff and to ensure that WPPL’s loan agreements complied with regulatory requirements.

 

http://www.fca.org.uk/news/fca-decides-to-cancel-payday-lenders-interim-permission-ban-its-sole-director

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2846 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...