Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cap1 & CCA return


tamadus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4967 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Just a thought

 

HI

Has anyone lookes into the legalities of this action.

The consumer credit act gives the crditor the option of terminating the account given the statutory notice and with just cause but the act says that the creditor is to supply credit upto the crdit limiton a correctly executed agreement, to arbitralrily remove this without just cause is surely in breach of the act.

Wnatever it says within the Egg terms and conditions the no opting out clause of the Consumer Credit Act ensure that no terms in the creditors T and cs can overide the act. Isn't this unlawful recession of contract.

Best regards

Peter

 

Interesting point well stated, Peter.

 

This happened to me when I sued Barclaycard for reclaim of charges - they "removed" the credit limit so I couldn't use the account, despite it being in credit. In fact, the account is still on my CRA file as "active" with a zero balance and £700 credit limit, so the account hasn't been closed but I can no longer use it.

 

I think you could be right!

 

Also, how can they arbitrarily search your credit file to see if you are "a good customer" - surely that's an abuse of your consent under the DPA also?

 

I bet this goes on a lot behind closed doors, but Egg is the first I've heard of to do it publicly.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi

 

Just a thought

 

HI

Has anyone lookes into the legalities of this action.

The consumer credit act gives the crditor the option of terminating the account given the statutory notice and with just cause but the act says that the creditor is to supply credit upto the crdit limiton a correctly executed agreement, to arbitralrily remove this without just cause is surely in breach of the act.

Wnatever it says within the Egg terms and conditions the no opting out clause of the Consumer Credit Act ensure that no terms in the creditors T and cs can overide the act. Isn't this unlawful recession of contract.

Best regards

Peter

 

 

If only we could contact these 186,000 people and get them to send in a section 78 CCact request wouldn't they end up with egg on their faces

egg20on20face.jpg

:cool: sunbathing in juan les pins de temps en temps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Interesting peice in Credit today I have just copied it.

 

"More than five million people failed to make a monthly repayment in the last half of 2007, increasing the revenue made by credit card providers on missed payments, figures show.

 

Research by comparison website moneyexpert.com found around 11 per cent of cardholders did not make a repayment on at least one occasion during the six months to 21 December 2007.

 

This is a two per cent increase on the number of people unable to keep up with their credit card commitments in the previous six months to 4 June, when just over four million people missed a monthly payment.

 

With every late payment incurring a charge of £12, credit card firms are estimated to have made around £61m in the six months to December 2007 compared with £50m in the period leading up to June."

 

I thought thes charges wer are justifiyable service charge and wher soley to cover costs so why the 11m increase in net profit. More grist for the mill

 

Best regards

peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Talking about Egg, i CCA'd them last year on an Egg Loan, swapped from a Egg Credit Card. The agreement isnt enforcable, everything has stopped, no payments, nothing heard about this account from Egg.

 

Think is i have a default on my credit file regarding this.

 

Is it possible to get the default removed as there isn't an agreement? Would i want to stir a wasps nest? What would happen to the outstanding balance?

 

I'd like to force their hand, obviously if they ever find it, they can come back to me, but if i push forward onto court for removal of the default, if i win cos of the lack of the agreement, what happens with the outstanding balance and does all history of this account come off my credit file?

 

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Talking about Egg, i CCA'd them last year on an Egg Loan, swapped from a Egg Credit Card. The agreement isnt enforcable, everything has stopped, no payments, nothing heard about this account from Egg.

 

Think is i have a default on my credit file regarding this.

 

Is it possible to get the default removed as there isn't an agreement? Would i want to stir a wasps nest? What would happen to the outstanding balance?

 

I'd like to force their hand, obviously if they ever find it, they can come back to me, but if i push forward onto court for removal of the default, if i win cos of the lack of the agreement, what happens with the outstanding balance and does all history of this account come off my credit file?

 

Thanks :)

 

Check this out;

 

Untitled1.jpg Here is the link to photobucket so you can see the image full size - hopefully.

 

Flash

 

This is also VERY useful here;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=1924&d=1201857472

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, i've downloaded it. Must also be available from the Information Commissioners Office titled "Data Protection Technical Guidance".
:D:D

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

modified agreements

 

http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file42664.pdf

 

response to this (I think)

RegulationofModifiedCreditagreements.pdf

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-1360980.html

 

GECF's application of fees and charges on store cards differs from that of many credit card issuers. Fees and charges are applied by GECF only to cover costs. GECF believes that many credit card providers apply late payment fees and over-limit charges to a much greater proportion of customers in any particular month than is the case for GECF and that for some of these providers fees and charges represent a significant source of net income20

 

whilst the above statement applies strictly only to GE storecards it gives an insight into their costs (meaning very little) it is believed that they charged zero cost for default notices and overlimit credit card fees but this needs confirmation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the links.

 

Do the Information Commissioners Office have the authority to remove defaults and are they the best bet to start with? Pr would it be easier just going to court?

 

Nope - they have no power at all.

 

They can only tell you if they think the company have commited an offence and if they have then you'll have to take legal action.

 

They are like the OFT, FSA and FOS - completely useless.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

100%

 

I have said before OFT+FSA+FOS+Information Commissioners Office = DDT

 

DDT?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4967 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...