Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • According to Wikipedia - yeah, I know - the site is owned by Croydon Council. It's at least worth a try to contact the council and ask for a contact in The Colonnades. You could then lay it on thick about being a genuine customer and ask them to call their dogs off. It's got to be worth a try  https://www.croydon.gov.uk/contact-us/contact-us  
    • 4 hours were soft play with the kids then moved to one of the restaurants for a meal. Restaurant took ages with our order but it was a group of parents so we were in no massive rush.  Ive been trying to find how to determine 100% if the road is public or not as I just based my assumption on the street signs, traffic lights and the bus. Regarding the PCN, does it covers all requirements needed to enforce or do you guys see any clear weak spots? Considering the size of the place and different areas and businesses reachable through that road where the cameras are, I believe is a massive assumption to use those photographs to calculate the time someone was actually parked in a designated parking spot as there are numerous other areas to load, unload, wait for people, drive throughs of restaurants, etc all within the area accessible through the one road where the ANPR is. One can go through most of the areas on street view in google. You can even see a car parked in the middle of the roundabout for example.
    • thought your story rang a bell. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416315-knightsbridgecreditfix-iva-treated-me-very-badly-thinking-of-bk-now-help/ you vanished and never cameback. dx  
    • and it legally informs them of your correct and current address as you must do with all old debts last paid/used in say 7 yrs you dont want backdoor CCJ's. what were the names of these IVA scammers, the one you took it out with, and the one that scammed you to let them take over please? your story is slightly worrying. dx  
    • Incidentally, congratulations on not buying the warranty. That is another Big Motoring World rip-off. See what we have to say about extended warranties and the Big Motoring World attitude to them is particularly unhelpful
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cap1 & CCA return


tamadus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4980 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Just a thought

 

HI

Has anyone lookes into the legalities of this action.

The consumer credit act gives the crditor the option of terminating the account given the statutory notice and with just cause but the act says that the creditor is to supply credit upto the crdit limiton a correctly executed agreement, to arbitralrily remove this without just cause is surely in breach of the act.

Wnatever it says within the Egg terms and conditions the no opting out clause of the Consumer Credit Act ensure that no terms in the creditors T and cs can overide the act. Isn't this unlawful recession of contract.

Best regards

Peter

 

Interesting point well stated, Peter.

 

This happened to me when I sued Barclaycard for reclaim of charges - they "removed" the credit limit so I couldn't use the account, despite it being in credit. In fact, the account is still on my CRA file as "active" with a zero balance and £700 credit limit, so the account hasn't been closed but I can no longer use it.

 

I think you could be right!

 

Also, how can they arbitrarily search your credit file to see if you are "a good customer" - surely that's an abuse of your consent under the DPA also?

 

I bet this goes on a lot behind closed doors, but Egg is the first I've heard of to do it publicly.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi

 

Just a thought

 

HI

Has anyone lookes into the legalities of this action.

The consumer credit act gives the crditor the option of terminating the account given the statutory notice and with just cause but the act says that the creditor is to supply credit upto the crdit limiton a correctly executed agreement, to arbitralrily remove this without just cause is surely in breach of the act.

Wnatever it says within the Egg terms and conditions the no opting out clause of the Consumer Credit Act ensure that no terms in the creditors T and cs can overide the act. Isn't this unlawful recession of contract.

Best regards

Peter

 

 

If only we could contact these 186,000 people and get them to send in a section 78 CCact request wouldn't they end up with egg on their faces

egg20on20face.jpg

:cool: sunbathing in juan les pins de temps en temps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Interesting peice in Credit today I have just copied it.

 

"More than five million people failed to make a monthly repayment in the last half of 2007, increasing the revenue made by credit card providers on missed payments, figures show.

 

Research by comparison website moneyexpert.com found around 11 per cent of cardholders did not make a repayment on at least one occasion during the six months to 21 December 2007.

 

This is a two per cent increase on the number of people unable to keep up with their credit card commitments in the previous six months to 4 June, when just over four million people missed a monthly payment.

 

With every late payment incurring a charge of £12, credit card firms are estimated to have made around £61m in the six months to December 2007 compared with £50m in the period leading up to June."

 

I thought thes charges wer are justifiyable service charge and wher soley to cover costs so why the 11m increase in net profit. More grist for the mill

 

Best regards

peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Talking about Egg, i CCA'd them last year on an Egg Loan, swapped from a Egg Credit Card. The agreement isnt enforcable, everything has stopped, no payments, nothing heard about this account from Egg.

 

Think is i have a default on my credit file regarding this.

 

Is it possible to get the default removed as there isn't an agreement? Would i want to stir a wasps nest? What would happen to the outstanding balance?

 

I'd like to force their hand, obviously if they ever find it, they can come back to me, but if i push forward onto court for removal of the default, if i win cos of the lack of the agreement, what happens with the outstanding balance and does all history of this account come off my credit file?

 

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Talking about Egg, i CCA'd them last year on an Egg Loan, swapped from a Egg Credit Card. The agreement isnt enforcable, everything has stopped, no payments, nothing heard about this account from Egg.

 

Think is i have a default on my credit file regarding this.

 

Is it possible to get the default removed as there isn't an agreement? Would i want to stir a wasps nest? What would happen to the outstanding balance?

 

I'd like to force their hand, obviously if they ever find it, they can come back to me, but if i push forward onto court for removal of the default, if i win cos of the lack of the agreement, what happens with the outstanding balance and does all history of this account come off my credit file?

 

Thanks :)

 

Check this out;

 

Untitled1.jpg Here is the link to photobucket so you can see the image full size - hopefully.

 

Flash

 

This is also VERY useful here;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=1924&d=1201857472

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, i've downloaded it. Must also be available from the Information Commissioners Office titled "Data Protection Technical Guidance".
:D:D

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

modified agreements

 

http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file42664.pdf

 

response to this (I think)

RegulationofModifiedCreditagreements.pdf

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-1360980.html

 

GECF's application of fees and charges on store cards differs from that of many credit card issuers. Fees and charges are applied by GECF only to cover costs. GECF believes that many credit card providers apply late payment fees and over-limit charges to a much greater proportion of customers in any particular month than is the case for GECF and that for some of these providers fees and charges represent a significant source of net income20

 

whilst the above statement applies strictly only to GE storecards it gives an insight into their costs (meaning very little) it is believed that they charged zero cost for default notices and overlimit credit card fees but this needs confirmation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the links.

 

Do the Information Commissioners Office have the authority to remove defaults and are they the best bet to start with? Pr would it be easier just going to court?

 

Nope - they have no power at all.

 

They can only tell you if they think the company have commited an offence and if they have then you'll have to take legal action.

 

They are like the OFT, FSA and FOS - completely useless.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

100%

 

I have said before OFT+FSA+FOS+Information Commissioners Office = DDT

 

DDT?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4980 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...