Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4604 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just had a fake visit from a bailiff company featured on exposure Now the fine has on up nearly £320 so its doubled!!

How bad are these companies? only monday the show went on air and its wednesday now and they are still taking advantage.

The letter that was left by the bailiff clearly states that because of todays visit the fine HAS increased £320 yet there was no effort to ring the bell or contact anyone..

 

Not yet going to state which company it is orwho the bailiff is as first i will complain to the company the council and the court that issued this fraudster with his cert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for the responses,

Yes this is for a parking fine

Calling the bailiff and asking for the visit fee to be knocked off is most likely what would be the best thing to do However thats only because we live in a country where a bailiff can lie and cheat and then if he/she is spotted doing something wrong just ignore the lie's ? And pay the fine! This would be like blackmail, as if its his right to con people because they live in fear of the fine increasing and or because one day they really will try and make contact.

There is no justice in calling him and saying i know what his game is so knock off the Fake fee's and all is ok.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for the responses,

Yes this is for a parking fine

Calling the bailiff and asking for the visit fee to be knocked off is most likely what would be the best thing to do However thats only because we live in a country where a bailiff can lie and cheat and then if he/she is spotted doing something wrong just ignore the lie's ? And pay the fine! This would be like blackmail, as if its his right to con people because they live in fear of the fine increasing and or because one day they really will try and make contact.

There is no justice in calling him and saying i know what his game is so knock off the Fake fee's and all is ok.

If from one visit an ambulance was called then what several visits later? Maybe you aren't as unwell as you make out and just want to carry on venting your anger at bailiffs rather than resolve the issue in the first place.

Goodluck

Link to post
Share on other sites

If from one visit an ambulance was called then what several visits later? Maybe you aren't as unwell as you make out and just want to carry on venting your anger at bailiffs rather than resolve the issue in the first place.

Goodluck

 

1. I do not recall saying i am unwell?

2. The bailiff did not visit for me it wqas for a family member

3. Resolving the fine is one thing ,the actions of the bailiff are wrong and a more important matter!

xbailiff you seem to have the attitude of someone who is a bailiff and not an ex bailiff..

Link to post
Share on other sites

To pour water on flames....I think Xbailiff has mixed up his posts? I 'm sure he will be along later to eat a slice of todays special....humble pie.

However you seem to have a plan to deal with this in your own way but I am sure caggers will help you along the right paths if you need their help.

At the moment, I for one am not sure if you seek advice as you do not make that clear. 'Tis but a suggestion but if you take a deep breathe and collect your thoughts then post again we will all know where we are?

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many apologies as post not meant for you as i was trying to keep things realistic for someone and we all make mistakes. Left the job in April but really left along time ago and as i had worked in the debt industry for 20yrs then some things are hard to leave behind. My intentions are to give advice and in some cases it isn't always going to meet with rave reviews but it will be honest and real time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries and to be honest i took a look at some of your other replies and do see you have made some useful comments but i also notice that some have been the PAY THE FEE'S kinda reply which is the only way to end the problem but its also the first thing that a bailiff would say to someone who owes them money regardless of it being genuine fee's.

 

The main thing with all bailiff complaints is there is no one to turn to, No one who can pause any action and make a proper investigation.

 

Contacting in the company may mean a slight delay or a reduction in illegal charges but thats where it ends.

Courts do not imprison dodgy bailiff because no one can take it that far.

The goverment do not look into the obvious floors with the system like the £250 plus fee's for visiting in a van which is to small to actualy remove much goods? the fact that the Small van is a company vehicle and its the used just for that one visit . Like did they normaily get the bus to peoples homes? obviously not..

If the vehicle came especially for 1 fine then how comes its then used to visit 10 addresses that same day and racking in near £3000??

 

The stress it causes people is terrible, it gives people the same feeling as being mugged in the street yet this is supposed to be someone who in some ways has morepowers than the police

Link to post
Share on other sites

contact the CAB they say and it will be put on hold(wrong), depends who you speak to at the council and whether they have a good rapour with the bailiff concerned or not but from the bailiffs point of view(me)they want as little hassle as possible so will negotiate and others are just complete bastards!! having a bad month, put waiting time on, say its double the van/attendance fee for a colleague turning up that they were going to meet for a coffee anyway, anything and evrything to justify the fees, i have been caught uo in it myself so know most the tricks of the trade.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To pour water on flames....I think Xbailiff has mixed up his posts? I 'm sure he will be along later to eat a slice of todays special....humble pie.

However you seem to have a plan to deal with this in your own way but I am sure caggers will help you along the right paths if you need their help.

At the moment, I for one am not sure if you seek advice as you do not make that clear. 'Tis but a suggestion but if you take a deep breathe and collect your thoughts then post again we will all know where we are?

 

WD

 

Where am i? I dont know :( I just understand that they can drive people's stress levels sky high... Any chance David camron can read this?? lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

contact the CAB they say and it will be put on hold(wrong), depends who you speak to at the council and whether they have a good rapour with the bailiff concerned or not but from the bailiffs point of view(me)they want as little hassle as possible so will negotiate and others are just complete bastards!! having a bad month, put waiting time on, say its double the van/attendance fee for a colleague turning up that they were going to meet for a coffee anyway, anything and evrything to justify the fees, i have been caught uo in it myself so know most the tricks of the trade.

 

My partner worked for the CAB and yes they cant help much, She is now a solicitor and still its not easy to take things further

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a fake visit from a bailiff company featured on exposure Now the fine has on up nearly £320 so its doubled!!

How bad are these companies? only monday the show went on air and its wednesday now and they are still taking advantage.

The letter that was left by the bailiff clearly states that because of todays visit the fine HAS increased £320 yet there was no effort to ring the bell or contact anyone..

 

Not yet going to state which company it is orwho the bailiff is as first i will complain to the company the council and the court that issued this fraudster with his cert

 

I didn't deal so much with parking fines but the council are aware of the charges and you can ask for a breakdown of fees and if they are charging for bogus visits then ask for proof as most cars have trackers and failing that they use pen forms linked to their phones which send a gps location when the bailiff sends it through as this was a requirement from most councils as many people said they had never had a visit and they were probably right so ask for proof and be adamant as and they may back down somewhat and you can get this resolved, speak to the council and ask what they should be charging and most councils are linked up to bailiffs website so they can review cases so they will see if you have had previous visits bogus or not but.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are in a position to pay the fine and the charges then do it straight away......then we can look at claiming back those fees that appear to have been wrongly applied without the threat of a return visit from your new found friend, to distract you from the job in hand.

 

If you have not received the paperwork that goes with the process of issuing the parking fine then you will need to start at base. I personally am awful with parking fines issues but their are many very very knowledgeable caggers on the forum who will without question be able to fill in the blanks.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't deal so much with parking fines but the council are aware of the charges and you can ask for a breakdown of fees and if they are charging for bogus visits then ask for proof as most cars have trackers and failing that they use pen forms linked to their phones which send a gps location when the bailiff sends it through as this was a requirement from most councils as many people said they had never had a visit and they were probably right so ask for proof and be adamant as and they may back down somewhat and you can get this resolved, speak to the council and ask what they should be charging and most councils are linked up to bailiffs website so they can review cases so they will see if you have had previous visits bogus or not but.

 

Wow inside knowledge..... great posting X bailff.....I think you can safely say you are starting to think less like a bailiff and more like a 'human' on the right side of justice. welcome to cag.....

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

or try frightening the bailiff with a form4 for excessive charging, no bailiff wants this and will turn the most hardened into a squeaky girl!!

Welcome, yes many will quake, but some will say that if the magistrates disagree they will go for the costs against you, Others will try to make you drop the form 4 under threats of fess on fees

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well someone did visit because the letter was posted by hand (no stamp) Gps tracking wouldnt help much because its not if they visted or not its more that they never had any intension of making contact ie didnt ring the bell just posted the letter to increase the fee's.

Maybe royal mail could employee this in a wage increase? they would make a fortune in stamps and the use of the red vans

Link to post
Share on other sites

The object of the visit by the Bailiff is to attend to levy distraint on your goods. If however he cannot gain access to your home to do so or otherwise distrain on goods outside then he may claim a 1st or 2nd Visit Fee as applicable. If you can prove he never attempted to contact you ie he crept up the path and just posted then there is no provision in the Regulations for a fee for a posted letter.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As many people on here know, I have a commercial business advising the public with regards to a bailiff visit.

 

I do not want everyone jumping about and screaming at the following comment but I feel that I need to be critical about non payment of parking tickets. Unlike unpaid council tax, the vehicle keeper will receive a PCN on the car or a letter in the post if the contravention was by way of CCTV. It is at THIS very early stage that the PCN can be paid at 50% DISCOUNT. Also at this stage, an appeal can be made to the local authority and if this is rejected by them, a request can be made to have the case referred to the Adjudicator. All of this is free.

 

If the above 2 stages are IGNORED, the 50% discount is no longer applicable and payment of the amount of the PCN is due. Normally, this will be for around £40-£60.

 

Yet another opportunity is given at Charge Certificate Rate to pay although the debt does increase.

 

If NOTHING is done at this stage, then YET ANOTHER chance is given at the Order for Recovery stage to either pay or MOST IMPORTANTLY, to complete the attached Statutory Declaration to state the you had not received the PCN or NtO and if a Stat Dec is submitted at this stage, the PCN AUTOMATICALLY reverts back to Notice to Owner stage all over again. It is at this stage that the Stat Dec can be submitted if the vehicle owner had made an appeal to the council and had not received a response.

 

Only after ALL of the above stages have passed can the council apply for permission to issue a warrant.

It really does break my heart when I receive enquiries all day long that yet another car has been clamped, removed or even sold.

 

That is why I would URGE everyone to make sure that they deal with a PCN at the VERY EARLY STAGE. Do NOT leave it to get to a position where a bailiff is visiting.

 

If everyone did the above, the income going to bailiff companies would significantly reduce........The local authority would not be affected as they would have been paid.

 

Bailiffs REAP THE REWARDS of vehicle owners failing to pay a PCN at the early stages. Lets make sure this STOPS !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i do agree that tickets should be paid asap but........... Holes in the road should also be repaired asap ect..

Just change the subject slightly, does anyone know if vehicle recognition system are actualy legal for the use of bailiffs? Ie does it not effect human rights to privacy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i do agree that tickets should be paid asap but........... Holes in the road should also be repaired asap ect..

Just change the subject slightly, does anyone know if vehicle recognition system are actualy legal for the use of bailiffs? Ie does it not effect human rights to privacy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...