Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry I've only just come onto break it just goes to page one of the thread for me. Do you know what post # it was?
    • Agree HB. Remove the cease and desist stuff. Otherwise it's a cracker! Shame you've used so many big words that they will just not understand.😅
    • That sounds pretty good. My only concern is the bit about the cease and desist letter to Excel, please wait for the guys to comment on your letter. HB
    • No mention of Schedule 4 of POFA = Only the driver is liable, not the keeper. Simply don't tell them who the driver is, which means  don't appeal. From a quick search of the site, yours is the first case I can see with Carparksecurities we've seen here so it'd be excellent if you keep up to date and engage with this thread. General advice is to ignore everything until / unless you ever get a letter of claim.
    • So I am now in receipt of a second Letter of Claim this time from DCBL although their letter head now says " DCBLegal"  😱 Now I'm guessing one response to a letter of claim is sufficient and I could ignore this but having been inspired by other snotty letters I wanted to have another bash at one. How does this sound? Dear Lackeys of Company with Unconscionable Morals, Thank you ever so much for gracing me with yet another Letter Before Claim on behalf of Excel Parking Services. How many of these delightful missives do you plan on sending before you muster the courage to follow through on your threats to take me to court? Just so we're clear, here is the response (in italics by that I mean the slanted text below) I previously sent to Excel’s Letter Before Claim, in case your attention to detail is as lacking as I suspect: I am currently 2-0 up in terms of Small Claims Court proceedings and I look forward to the opportunity to claim a hat trick, this case being more straightforward than my previous two. I will be asking the court for an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) due to your conduct over this absurd claim. Despite my best efforts, you continue to assert that I have breached your terms. However, I cannot breach terms that I was not present to accept. Have you even read my initial response? I suggest you review it thoroughly and save yourself some money. Additionally, please refer to section 13 of the IPC Code of Practice, 2023 edition. I eagerly await your deafening silence. Remarkably, I haven't heard a peep from Excel since my response; instead, they've passed the baton to you to perform this tiresome routine once more. Consider this my official notice that I am sending a cease and desist letter to Excel Parking Services. Their relentless hounding has crossed the line into clear harassment. Any further demands for payment from you, as Excel's lackeys, will be regarded as nothing more than shameless acts of intimidation and harassment. I now look forward to the deafening sound of your silence. Yours sincerely,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Need help with disputed debt with bt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4657 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have an old account with BT that i have been in dispute of. I am now receiving threatening letters from a dca (srj Debt Recoveries). I dispute the amount claimed as i had a shoddy terribe service and cancelled with them. turns out i was not in the area that should have gotten the service. While i agree that i may owe a little, i certainly do not owe them as much as they claim. can someone give me a template letter to email to this company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. can you give us a little more detail as to what

has occurred?

Is the DCA just collecting on behalf of BT?

Did you receive a default notice and

a Notice of Assignment before contact was

made by the DCA?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Dimwits take note there is

an outstanding dispute with BT

regarding this alleged debt, therefore

I do not acknowledge any debt to you or

any company you may claim to represent.

My suggestion is that you return this alleged

debt to your client , as I have no obligation

or wish to correspond with your company.

 

Yours extremely sincerely,

 

PI**ed OFF BT Customer.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Dimwits take note there is

an outstanding dispute with BT

regarding this alleged debt, therefore

I do not acknowledge any debt to you or

any company you may claim to represent.

My suggestion is that you return this alleged

debt to your client , as I have no obligation

or wish to correspond with your company.

 

Yours extremely sincerely,

 

ANOTHER PI**ed OFF BT Customer.

then complain, in writing...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget law and regs keep the the complaint simple

and to the point ,

just a more ''normal'' version of my post.

 

1, state that there is an unresolved dispute with BT

therefore you cannot respond to them.

2. If you have not received a notice of assignment

of the debt to the DCA tell them this.

 

Send it RD and copy to BT.

simples:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

and write a Formal Complaint to BT stating the facts (you don't need to send proof) that you have emailed and written and been ignored and you are now complaining to the Ombusman. I've been there with BT and the only thing that stopped it was a complaint to the Ombusman (but neither responded, it just ceased). I am tempted by their broadband solution but won't because its BT and they are worse than a chocolate fire guard...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, what actually happened with me is that i opted for broadband with bt and even from the beginning it was difficult reception and quality. Of course, i just put it down to the area i was living. Anyway, i had it for months and complained several times and then lost the rag and cancelled. They then told me that i was not in the correct area for the reception and should not have had it. Before that, i paid religiously.

 

Now i am harrassed by these dca's - incidently anyone got a direct email for them SRJ Debt recoveries

Link to post
Share on other sites

Silly Ridiculous Juveniles don't have an email address, just one for you to pay them what you don't owe.

 

All you need do with these clowns is send them a letter informing them that the amount they are attempting to force you to pay for a service you never received, is in dispute with BT, and as there is no contract between you and SRJ, you will not enter into any further correspondence with them, it is advised that they give this account back to their client who should take responsibility for their actions instead of passing them onto third parties to sort out.

 

Thank them for their continued harassment, all of which has been given to the OFT for their investigation, you don't require them to inform you of them closing their files in respect of this fictitious claim, as you have no desire to hear from them.

 

SRJ are another one of the most inept DCA's who I am having the pleasure of dealing with at the minute, in fact I rang them earlier to find out how they are getting on with collecting on the debt I don't owe with Virgin Bledia, it's still on hold apparently......and has been since the end of June!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Take note there is an outstanding dispute with BT regarding this alleged debt, therefore I do not acknowledge any debt to you or any company you may claim to represent. My suggestion is that you return this alleged debt to your client , as I have no obligation or wish to correspond with your company. I have now decided to report BT to offcom and will be filing a ADR disagreement. I suggest you return to BT and have them contact me direct. Please also take note that I do not have a contract with you and as I do not wish to deal with you at all, I will not be requiring a notice that the file has been returned. I will also be reporting your company to trading standards and the office of fair trading.

 

I thank you for their continued harassment, all of which has been given to the OFT for their investigation. This claim is fictitious.

 

A hard copy letter will follow and a copy of the official offcom complaint to BT will be sent direct to them.

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...