Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've had a text and email from MCB: "Dear XXXXX Please contact us today. Your payment has not been brought up to date and we would like to discuss your account with you as a matter of urgency. Our telephone number is 02039236888"   " Early investigations confirm you are resident at the above address. Despite this, we have not managed to speak to you about your now, seriously overdue debt.   We are now instructing our external debt collectors to contact you directly in relation to your loan account. If you want to avoid this course of action, contact us today on 0203 923 6888"
    • What type of finance is it?   HP, PCP, Loan? They want her to ring so they can bully her into making payments she can't afford...unless she can record her calls then IMHO, I'd keep everything in writing. Is £400 SSP her only income? There's no chance they will justify taking half of that.   Lodge a formal complaint with them ASAP, exhaust it, and then you can escalate it sooner rather than later, ruddy sharks!  
    • Is all of this actually on the signage? Don't remember seeing that much detail on other threads.
    • If I have learnt one thing from this forum, it's not to call and communicate via email. I passed this info on to her and they are pushing for her to call them.    "Unfortunately, you will need to call us. The conversation won’t be so black and white as to therefore type over email. In a nutshell we can confirm that the request to not pay for 3 months we cannot put in place"  I emailed them back on her behalf and said that what ever is discussed over the phone will need to be put in an email so that she can review it properly. No decisions will be made on that phone call.    "Once we speak to you on the phone we will follow up with an email to confirm the options discussed. [Phone number]"   Why are they pushing for a phone call? If its not so black and white, why can they then follow up with an email?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

wescot .please help


maggie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5736 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you have not signed a CCA, how could your personal or financial details have been passed to an agent or anybody else without your specific authority? Ask Wescot for a copy of their letter of instruction from their client. their clients have a duty to ensure any personal and financial information you provide is kept securely. Who have Wescot shared / given it to?

 

Ask for a FULL breakdown of your account, including charges, and emphasise the unlawful provision of information as above. Bear in mind Wescot are on a 'no win, no fee' arrangement and will probably have very little information about your account.

 

Have you made a DPA to Wescot? Let's know what they know - what info they have been passed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 602
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think they are just trying to put you off, hoping you don't know what your doing. Their reply seems quite stupid though. Keep their reply somewhere safe.

 

With studio cards it would seem you order something and then either pay it off, in full, within x days or make at least the minimum payment and have interest charged to your account. It sounds a lot like a credit card without the plastic. Studio are not above the consumer credit act, they charge a minimum of 29.5% on a rolling credit account and don't come under any of the exclusions.

 

TideTurner is quite right, scan through any credit agreement and you will find clauses allowing them to give details to credit reference agencies and pass on the debt to a 3rd party. If no agreement exists studio are in breach of the Data Protection Act for supplying wescot with the account or registering defaults etc.

 

I guess you want to know where you stand right now. After the 12 days is up the debt is unenforceable until they can provide you with a copy of the agreement. But they have already admitted it doesn't exist in writing, making it unenforceable as of right now. Also you've got the perfect defence against any court claim should they decide to waste their own time. You can stop paying them anything more.

 

Check this thread and decide what you want to do from here. (it's a long thread full of various peoples information but read through the first 5 pages or so and you'll get the idea) http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions/10900-loan-company-cannot-supply.html

 

Send of the DPA request as planned, find out what you've paid in charges and claim them back at the very least. You could ask for everything back (as in above thread) and cause some nasty trouble for studio with the authorities I imagine.

 

You can relax now ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mutzi + Tideturner

I will send the DPA requeat off to Wescot,but if I need any further help,when and if I receive a reply,can I call on both your help in this matter,also please could either of you advise me on some sort of reply I can send to them?

Any help would be most appreciated,my strength is beginning to return now,and my health is improving day by day.slowly,but I am not sure if I should send some sort of a reply to them,as well as a DPA.

 

thanks Maggie

 

 

p.s. sorry to sound like an idiot,but I am not really clued up on all this yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tideturner,

Checked bank account this morning,and wescot have cashed the cheque I sent them for the DPA,They received my Dpa request thru recorded delivery on Monday 9th October,I checked on the track and trace Royal Mail site.I will post their reply as soon as I receive it.Can I send you a message to tell you I have posted their reply please.?

Thanks for your help in this so far.

Maggie

 

40 days and counting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually Maggie, you might not get too much out of Wescot for the Data Protection Act Subject Access Request. This usually generates much more from the bank or credit card or finance house you had the original credit from. It includes all the statements of account from where you can get all the payments penalty charges which I guess is actually what you'd be looking for upon which to base your claim.

 

Wescot will only have to provide the info they have on their system, which will only produce the payment record you have with them invariably so you're waiting 40 days to get not much at all.

 

 

Tide is suggesting you should have 'signed a CCA', ( maybe the Consumer Credit Agreement ) not quite sure what he means but the CCA is the Consumer Credit Act requirement for the creditor to supply a copy of your statement and a copy of the 'signed' agreements you signed when you took the credit in the first place with the bank/cc/finance co., and of any defaults registered against you by them with the Credit Reference Agencies, they should also, if they have purchased the debt from the original company, supply you with the ' Deed of Assignment' stating they legally own the debt. If, in this case Wescot were to get a CCA ' request' from you then they would have the 12 working days in which to supply the copy of the originals as above before requiring a court order to enforce the debt and after a further 30 days without supplying it they are committing a criminal offence and should be reported to the Trading Standards. The debt becomes unenforceable. In laymans terms this means ' how can they ask you for money when they dont have any agreement with you? it's extortion. If you have paid them anything you can ask for the lot back.

 

 

Most DCA's do not have any copies of agreements when they take on these debts and it is a nightmare for them to get them from the banks and to you within 12 working days anyway. They have either disposed of them ( a lot of the older accounts anyway) or lost them so your chances are slim of receiving anything. I have two which have gone way over the 30 days dates both together they cover 20k + so I am sitting quietly waiting and watching with interest ( compound!:D )

 

However, if the paperwork arrives, even after the 30 days then a court order can re ignite them so it's not all plain sailing, but once you have followed the letter procedure to Trading standards or you write to the DCA telling them they have committed an offence you'll invariably get a letter stating they can't find the paperwork and they have either put the account on hold or written it off.

I'd send off a CCA request to Wescot with a £1 postal order if I were you straight away and get that clock ticking, and as long as you have the Data Protection Act S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to the original creditor you'll be covered.

 

I wouldn't advise stop paying until you have the debt period unenforceable ie: after the 12 working days + 1 month + 2 extra for delivery allowance period ( it's officially received 2 days after posting so your 12 days begin 2 days after posting)

 

 

Interesting eh:rolleyes: ?

 

 

Good luck..

 

 

How about a click on the ole darlings scales above if this helps. I lose a lb for every click and my avatar's getting heavy!

  • Confused 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andrew1,

If you look at my previous threads,I have already sent a CCA to Wescot,and they sent me a letter of reply (see threads above)Thank you for your input,I appreciate it.

The 12 days were up on October 8th,so please could you tell me if the 30 days begin from that date,or does it include the 12 days.

Thanks Maggie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Maggie

 

I am having a right ol time with Westcot. I got a lovely red letter from them saing they wanted £5k by the 19th or it was going to court!!!! I am sick with worry. I am a student nurse surviving on £500 per month which includes rent travel books everything!

 

However if your 12 days were up on 8th october then wait until 8th November before reporting them to OFt and trading standards.

 

 

Good luck

17/4 Sent CCA Request to Cabot - Argos/Cabot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just catching up, been really busy lately.

 

Yes, it would be the 8th November, although I don't think they will actually have commited an offence, given that they've admitted there never was an agreement.

 

Wait for their reply to the DPA request, get a total for everything you've paid and what for, then we can see about claiming it back. I would go for the whole lot. Some people are of the opinion that morally, regardless of the lack of paperwork, you should still pay back the original debt (minus charges) but in a lot of cases, such as yours, I see it as just compensation for the way they treat people.

 

If they start coming after you to make payments I'll find a suitable 'get lost' reply. Otherwise there's nothing really to do at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just catching up, been really busy lately.

 

Some people are of the opinion that morally, regardless of the lack of paperwork, you should still pay back the original debt (minus charges) .

 

 

So if I write to you saying you owe me a few thou you'll pay me then will you?

 

If it were the bank or original creditor then that moral issue I can fully understand and accept. I've done the same myself. I had a debt which was nearly 20k that I was paying off albeit in small amounts but I was paying it. The bank then sold it to a ****** dca who paid next to nothing for it and gave me hell. I have no pleasure in running away from paying the bank, in fact I'd have prefered if they had kept it and I could continued paying, but the DCA was being a typical DCA so I CCA'd them to shut them up and I haven't heard a twinkle from them since, that was in June !

So I have as much moral obligation to the DCA as you should have for my letter to you asking for a few thou and having no proof you owe THEM anything.

 

Oh, and Maggie, I'm sorry if I misled you, your 12 days are twelve ' working days' and the 30 days is one month and yes I should have read through all the thread, I tend to start at the bottom and work up! - sorry :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some people are of the opinion that morally, regardless of the lack of paperwork, you should still pay back the original debt (minus charges) but in a lot of cases, such as yours, I see it as just compensation for the way they treat people.

 

Just to clarify: this site advocates the paying back of debt which is being legitimately sought by the original creditor, minus any unlawful charges. If a debt is being sought by a DCA then you don't owe them a bloody penny and should kick scream and squirm until you get out of it... or get back to the original creditor.

 

You're right that if there is no "executed agreement" then the DCA have not committed the offence in s.77(1) or s.78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act... but they may actually be committing a number of OTHER offences under the CCA *and* several other Acts. If you don't owe them anything because there is no executed agreement between you, then they are not entitled to recover anything from you... and attempts to do so fall foul of a number of Laws.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasn't saying anything was owed to the DCA, just pointing out that some people might put forward the point that you 'should' pay them anyway. I did not say I agree with this. I realise now I wasn't very clear but only brought it up in case maggie had any doubts about claiming everything back from them.

 

If it gets refered back the original creditor thats a seperate issue. As andrew1's case demonstrates they might just disappear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I can,t beleive it.Wescot have just rung me to inform me that I had made an agreement to pay each month.I bluntly told her ,that I was unable to speak to her at this moment.They say they will call back later.HELP!!!!!!!!!

wHAT DI i SAY TO THEM.

MAGGIE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maggie -

 

Just say "I'm sorry Maggie's not available right now." and keep repeating that. IF THEY ATTEMPT to discuss the account with you, (even to say "Maggie owes money and we need to speak to her") report them to the Information Commissioner immediately - they are in breach of the Data Protection Act.

 

Don't be intimidated - that's exactly what they're aiming for. Just keep repeating the phrase above and they should not talk to you. If they get nasty, hang up. If their number comes up on the display and you know it's them, red button them - don't answer. Keep (save) as many voicemails as you can though, especially if they're threatening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to say,I received a letter from them stating they are unable to supply the credit agreement,and I,m waiting for info from my S.A.R. request.

Maggie

 

LOL!!

 

So in attempting to enforce this, they could actually be comitting an offence! (in fact they most definitely are committing an offence under s.40 of the Administration of Justice Act and s.1 of the Protection from Harrassment Act - but I was originally meaning the CCA). From this moment on, ignore ANY communications from them until the 12 working days plus 30 calendar days is up; then report them to trading standards. Follow the procedure outlined above for 'phone calls.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok.I have written the above letter posted by mutzi,but also added the following.=

I request that you cease and desist contacting me by telephone.All further correspondence be in writing.I am familiar with the terms of section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act.ignoring or disregarding debtors legitimate wishes in respect of when and where to contact them.

If you continue to contact me by telephone ,you will be in breach of the wireless and Telegraphy Act (1949)and i will take action on this.

with reference to the telephone call on the blah,blah,between one of your operatives and myself,i would like a transcript of this conversation,as i made no mention or made ANY AGREEMENT to pay the outstanding balance of £6--.by the 30/09/06(reference to your letter dated the 15/09/06

 

do you think this is ok.

thanks maggie.

Remember this? Don't think they have ;)

 

If they phone back remind them of this letter then say "What agreement?, I don't remember signing anything like that, send me a copy via post. Do not phone me again." then hang up.

 

Then read through this and decide what you want to do. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/14977-reporting-harassment.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...