Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

wescot .please help


maggie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5736 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 602
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks for your kind thoughts on Xmas,but the only thing I have been able to manage to swallow for the past couple of weeks is soup,ice cream,and a cup of tea.Looks as if there will be no turkey dinner for me this year.

Maggie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

Received following letter from Wescot this morning,in reply to my letter I sent them for a copy of the cca.

Dear Madam,

Further to your recent correspondence blah blah .blah,

 

We can advise you have not signed an agreement,therefore,a copy is not available in this instance,as no agreement is required to accept the goods.

 

 

In the meantime ,the account has been placed on hold,pending receipt of your monthly payments.

 

 

Please contact our client direct,concerning the above,should you have any queries.

 

Trust that this clarifies the situation.

 

Also they(studio) have charged me for ppi ,which I did not request amounting to £37.00

 

Oh dear (for them.) Is it £37 total or £37/month?

 

The £21.50 charges I'm guessing are for late payment/over limit. What are the £3 ones listed as? Doesn't matter I suppose if there never was a credit agreement :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Consumer Credit Agreement is the contract between the parties, which is specifically designed to conform to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (also 2000 & 2006). The fact they are 'hiding' and failing to produce it sounds volumes. In particular, most Debt Collection Agencies train their staff that what they are doing is right as "you will have signed a Consumer Credit Agreement".

 

If the DCA's have access to this information, they have received it unlawfully.

 

Lots to go on here - Maggie I have PM'd.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TT - please - this information may be of use to others with similar problems; let's keep it public eh?

 

Maggie; I'm really sorry to hear about your health and family problems; I'm sure that Westcot is the LAST thing you need. I would STRONGLY advise you to ask BT for a number change - it will be done INSTANTLY if you explain that you're being harrassed.

 

Oh, and Maggie - if you ever want anyone to talk to - just to hear a friendly voice - I'm PM'ing you my phone number. Don't call tonight (it's Yule and I'm celebrating ;) ) but any other time is fine. However; anything that could be construed as help regarding this "case" I would rather keep on the forum; it protects you AND me from anything bad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SL, I am currently finishing my N1 Claim which is for a repossession. Got a few days off over xmas and have a previous letter I sent to three DCA's who came after me. Haven't heard a peep so will adapt this for Maggie then focus on Studio.

 

This is also another opportunity to register a complaint with the ICO (Information Commissioners Office) and the DTI (Dept. Trade and Industry) on the grounds that if Studio hold a Consumer Credit License they are an 'unfit person' to do so.

 

The more these are highlighted the better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if Studio hold a Consumer Credit License they are an 'unfit person' to do so.

 

Do you know, I don't know if they do... it seems a bit mad saying she can pay every month and then saying "you don't need a credit agreement"... goes absolutely contrary to the CCA 1974.

 

*to the world at large*

 

Guys, if you offer monthly terms then you need a Consumer Credit Licence and the agreement needs to be signed by both parties and conform to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (As amended)!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So we need to get a copy of it Maggie, why they have not been forthcoming is baffling, no interesting. We'll dig a bit deeper. What is interesting is I don't believe they would have made such a demand by the 29th December unless they were desperate.

 

Let's see, have you blended that turkey yet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Maggie,

 

Sorry to hear you are experiencing many problems with Wescot.

 

I am a bit of a Veteran when it comes to these guys. I managed to get my CCJ removed and the Debt written off.

 

In order to get anywhere with these Clowns make all your requests to:

 

Process and Compliance Coordinator

Wescot Credit Services Ltd

PO Box 137

Dunedin House

45 Percy Street

Hull

HU2 8HF

 

Outline the story so far, If I remember correctly earlier on in this thred Wescot had passed the account back to their Clients. If so make them aware of this and ask them why they are chasing it. Also I am confused as to how they can enforce an agreement that simply does not exist.

Completed:

Woolwich: Received £30

Intelligent Finance: Received £1100 after two years and approximately 20 letters, 6 pieces of hair and an eyeball.

Barclaycard: Received £90

HFC: Received £170

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Poochball,

 

Studio 'and others' use DCA's to apply pressure and occasionally where they cannot justify their actions they will try and force a settlement.

 

Maggie simply wants details of their claim in writing. She should now write to Studio, outlining the correspondence, notifications, and the fact she will not be dealing with Westcot further.

 

We will then await the CCA and other information as requested.

 

Tide

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok ,Had another final demand from Wescot this morning,demanding I pay full amount by 16th January,or they are taking me to court ,plus charging me legal expenses of £150.00 on top.I have still not received any cca from requests to both Studio or wescot,ahve received copy of my statements only from Studio in reply to my dpa,but nothing from Wescot in reply to my dpa request.Dpa request from Wescot is well over time limit,and both cca reuests from Studio and Wescot,are well over time limits.What do I have to do now.please?

Maggie

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would urge you to change your phone numbers, and then complain to the following for the listed reasons:

  • Information Comissioner's Office - because Westcot failed to reply to your Data Protection Act SA R
  • Office of Fair Trading - because Westcot are harrassing you despite the fact you do not acknowledge any debt to them. Because you are being pursued for an unenforceable, unlawful credit arrangement.
  • The Financial Services Authority because you believe that Studio may be offering credit without appropriate licensing and under unlawful arrangements

The facts as I understand them are as follows:

 

You borrowed money from Studio Cards to pay for cards etc. They agreed to lend you the money (i.e. they did not extract payment from you for the goods before sending them but agreed to a monthly payment to cover the cost of the goods). They apparently did not ask you to sign a Credit Agreement regulated under the Consumer Credit Act. They are now trying to enforce this arrangement by the use of a DCA who are behaving illegally by harrassing you and causing extreme undue distress.

 

Again as I understand it, the arrangement you have with Studio Cards is unenforceable, illegal and unlawful all rolled into one. They may have committed criminal offences in relation to providing unlicensed credit to a consumer. Westcot may have committed and seemingly continue to commit criminal offences in relation to the way they are pursuing the debt and in relation to their failure to provide evidence of their authority to act at all. Finally, as a final nail in the coffin of these awful organisations, you have told them that the amount is in dispute and that they may not enforce the collection until the dispute is resolved.

 

When you complain to the organisations above, tell them all this, and send them COPIES of ALL the correspondence you have relating to this matter. DON'T send the original of ANYTHING.

 

Finally, I really REALLY hope you are well and getting better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear they are still chasing you maggie. Remember how many deadlines they have said they will take you to court after, in your very first post in this thread you supposedly had until the end of September. It's just intimidation.

 

And a couple of additional points you could throw in when complaining. Studio have charged you for PPI without any sort of agreement. Wescot have sent you a letter stating they are no longer dealing with the account and then continued on anyway.

 

The ICO should be able to get wescot to provide you with the infomation requested. Neither the OFT or FSA will take up individual complaints, if laws have been broken they will act for consumers as a whole. Trading standards I think are still your best bet for ridding yourself of wescot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

YES!! I could NOT for the life of me remember who it was that would act! Trading Standards is who to complain to - not the OFT. Complain to the Trading Standards Office in Westcot's home town (where they send their correspondence from) and send a copy to your own area Trading Standards Office.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maggie,

 

A complaint to the ICO is a must. They also cannot act on a single complaint, however, every complaint is logged and may be used against Westcot and others.

 

Westcot need a simple referral to your previous correspondence, and a reminder that what they are doing is unlawful (on the instruction of others).

 

Issue proceedings? Add costs?

 

They haven't even made this a legal matter, and have not consulted solicitors.

 

I will construct a letter to each shortly re:

 

1. Westcot and Studio - reiteration of S.40 Administration of Justice Act - they are fully aware of this, yet continue to attempt to bully this out of you anyway.

 

2. Lack of CCA Agreement - as SL says, unenforceable, unlawful and bare faced. If they had this agreement they should have provided it by now.

 

3. Westcot and Studio - Failure to comply to a subject access request - letter to ICO with complaint, additionally requests from the ICO for details of their registration numbers (whether data controllers, data processors or neither).

 

4. DTI - Whether Studio hold a Consumer Credit License.

 

5. OFT - Simply to register (but Studio may get a lot of complaints, so must be investigated.

 

6. ICSTIS - Complaint about Wescot

 

Tide

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, please see this reply which may just be a way of them losing the small claims

 

"

This thread is located at:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/33174-consumer-credit-act-agreements-new-post.html

Here is the message that has just been posted:

***************

hi, today i received a letter from a large very well known DCA that I CCA'd in July. They couldn't comply and told me in Sept that they couldn't find agreement. I received a letter today stating that they were closing the file on this because they "*the debt cannot be enforced without the original credit agreement and you have now advised us that you do not acknowledge this debt any further" *I would also say that this was for a not inconsiderable amount of money, and they have details of all payments made to it and direct debt mandate. now there is no way that an established company of this size and notoriety would do this if they had the slightest chance of continuing with it to court. So take heart and don't be fobbed off. I'm not posting the name here because I'm not finished with them but if anyone wants to know pm me."

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...