Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help! Husband's 18year old mortgage debt landed on our doorstep today. I'm terrified.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4045 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Get that letter to the OFT and Trading Standards and anyone else advised by this site, they are talking a load of bollards here, they are rushing to get as much money out of people they can and they are panicking.

 

Your OH still has no liability to them as they have not provided any clear documentation, and they did NOT contact him and he acknowledged the debt in the 6 year period (the 12 year period is divided into two parts, after the first 6 years they CANNOT add any more interest). He is still in the clear.

 

Please please stop worrying as if this ended up in court there are a lot of people on this site who can help with a defence that will run rings round all their arguements, a mortgage shortfall has to be proven to be reasonable, and most of them aren't so again there is another arguement to be pursued.

 

Have they provided any breakdown of how the amount arose - NO, so therefore it is an unproven unsecured loan and has little priority.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 822
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Have they provided any Breakdown of how the amount arose - NO, so therefore it is an unproven unsecured loan and has little priority.

[/b

i don't know; what i do know is that in July 1995 the H sold his £45,000.00 flat for £22,000.00 !!!!!!!

 

Helloooo??

Is anyone out there???

I really need some hep with this letter, please....

Edited by perplexedofdorset
Link to post
Share on other sites

You've been given the advice available, they have no leg to stand on here and are trying (and succeding) to panic you.

 

Your OH has nothing to worry about, they are unlikely to get this to court before next year and by then it WILL be statute barred under the CML code (12 years), they are being 'inventive' with dates as it suits them, for mortgage shortfall debt it has been proven that the 'date' starts from the DAY AFTER the missed MORTGAGE PAYMENT which starts the court action, regardless of any later payments. Has been proven in a couple of court cases so it may very well be statute barred already.

 

If you see my previous post they have not provided you with a breakdown of figures, have not shown that they are directly responsible for collection of the alleged shortfall and are behaving in a manner which needs to be reported to the Solicitors Regulatory Authority.

 

Just because they say he owes does not mean to say he DOES.

 

For example, you now owe me £150 for advice given on this site, if I sent an invoice to you for that would you pay it? That is what they are doing, misusing the law because it suits THEM.

 

If they had any chance of getting their alleged funds back earlier they would have tried, this is a 'last gasp' attempt to reset the clock and you now need to sit back and wait.

 

Stop panicking as there is not a lot they can do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Difficult not to, Silly girl.

Sorry about the double posts , my computer seems to be on a go slow at the mo.

 

they have not provided you with a Breakdown of figures

i don't know...

they sent their 'proofs' that I requested a couple of letters back...this includes copies of emails, the unsigned letter and a list of payments.....

is that what you are asking???

 

I need to know what to do next...usually I have fired back a letter and then felt relatively safe for a while as I know (I think) they have to respond and can't just...just...just...

Oh I don't know what...send the bailiffs in, Attach an earning thing, drag my OH to court.....I don't understand what monsters sending a letter can stave off but it seems to do something (Psychological) for me??!!

What is next??????

Do you think I am going round the twist??? :bowl:

Link to post
Share on other sites

That isn't what you need, they have tried to send PROOF that your OH admitted to the alleged debt, what you need is

 

1. Proof of valuations taken after repossession of property and at time of sale

2. Purchasers solicitors details (so you can check with them the company ain't pulling a fast one)

3. Was any resale of the property achieved within a 12 month period (will highlight another 'fast one') if resale took place quickly

4. Details of all works carried out with associated paperwork, including tenders, details of company involved, their invoices to the mortgage company to provide proof it was carried out

5. Advertising and which estate agents were involved

 

The list is endless, they have only provided a very limited source of dubious origin, and they need to have all this if they want to proceed with court.

 

There is a shortfall letter in the template section.

 

They are trying to get anything they can at the moment as they are in trouble themselves, and need the money to prove to the government they are doing their best to stop customers getting into debt - well this is proof they are milking the cash cow the other end and ending up with zilch.

 

Your OH has nothing to worry about - I was repossessed 6 years ago and the company have tried to get some money out of me, and ended up having to refund themselves at one point, as they (and the other company involved) are in administration they wouldn't get the money anyway.

 

There is also the arguement of unfair relationship which can be applied to the mortgage itself, as well as various other documented cases, a good solid defence can be mounted which will give the mortgage company nightmares in return.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it won't seem odd to 'suddenly' ask for all these details, after all they are 'suddenly' asking your OH to pay for something he may notbe liable for. Plus it will show to them that you mean business.

 

Don't forget to head any letter

 

Dear XXX

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY ALLEGED DEBT TO YOU OR YOUR AGENTS/THIRD PARTIES

 

Give them as much gip as they are giving you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

which template??? I can't find one for mortgage shortfall???

 

AHH...are these letters....

M1,Breakdown of balance owed.

M2, please write off this debt

M3, Full and Final settlement

etc???

I found these from googling the web!

 

Name of creditor...would that be the Halifax???

Edited by perplexedofdorset
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, here is a draft adapted from the template M1 found (via google) on this site...

 

(Our address)

 

Halifax

Mortgage Repossesions

Trinity Rd

Halifax

HX1 2RG 25th October 2011

 

REF: Mortgage shortfall regarding (address of property)

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Thank you for your letter concerning the above account.

I do not acknowledge any alleged debt to you, your agents or any third parties.

 

Please supply me with a full breakdown of the balance claimed under the above account.

 

In order for me to deal with the matters you raised, I should be grateful if you would supply me with answers to the following points;

 

 When did the arrears begin?

 When was the last payment made on the account?

 On what date was the Possession Order given?

 On what date was the house sold?

 What valuations were made on the property after repossession and at time of sale?

 What costs were involved in maintaining the property during the period between the repossession and the sale?

 Which Estate agents marketed the property?

 How was the house marketed and sold and at what price?

 What costs were involved in selling the property?

 Has a claim been made against the indemnity insurance and how much was recovered?

 How has interest been calculated from the start of the arrears?

 

Please supply me with a full breakdown of the balance claimed under the above account.

 

I look forward to receiving your reply as soon as possible.

 

Yours Faithfully

 

(Printed name)

 

So what do people think?

Not confusing to be asking for these details?

My OH did raise concerns that the flat sold for less than half the mortgaged value.

So, any advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could also ask what offers were made on the property - it is their duty to do their best so say for example

 

I made an offer of say £30,000 they turn me down hoping to get more. no one made a better offer and I by this time had found another property so withdrew my offer.

months go by and no offers, recession hits or the property is vandalised due to being empty, best offer they can get now is this £22,000

 

Did they act in your best interest NO they had a better offer but refused it. You can not be held responsible for their greed

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter MUST be headed "I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE" as previously advised.

 

All it means is that you are NOT taking this lying down and will fight tooth and nail to the deadline, which IMHO has already passed. I would actually send their second letter to the Council of Mortgage Lenders and ask for their opinion and help, they are WAY out of line here.

 

It is NOT IMPLYING that your OH admits this alleged debt it is giving them a taste of their own nasty medicine.

 

The I do not acknowledge comes BEFORE any body of the letter, not after the first line, it comes immediately after the Dear Sir/Madam bit to make it actual, anywhere else in the letter could be deemed admission of evasion by the company....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make them do some running around, they will say they are pursuing the debt and often try to in the face of SB'd debt.

 

Remember you are dealing with pond life who will say anything to get money, if they said "Good morning" It'd be Teatime and they would dig Elvis up if he owed them 10p

Andrew

 

Escaped the DCA nightmare, now helping others start businesses

www.ukleakdetection.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply RDM,

 

So the letter is OK? just to add to the list of questions:-

 

 What offers were made on the property and why were they not accepted?

 

What will this letter achieve though?Its slightly off track isn't it? Do you not think this will imply that my OH is liable or is admitting liability by wanting to know about the breakdown of the debt?

 

He has said that it seemed a ridiculously low price to be sold for and regarded it as highly suspicious and perhaps a whiff of corruption.

 

But we have enough on our plate at the moment with this last letter to be worrying about conspiracy theories...dah da dahhh!! :spy:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok guys this is the letter as is at present, to be sent to the H mortgage repossessions department, the people who wrote the last letter to us...Is that right??

 

REF: Mortgage shortfall regarding (address of property)

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

I do not acknowledge any alleged debt to you, your agents or any third parties.

 

Thank you for your letter concerning the above account.

In order for me to deal with the matters you raised, I should be grateful if you would supply me with answers to the following points;

 When did the arrears begin?

 When was the last payment made on the account?

 On what date was the Possession Order given?

 On what date was the house sold?

 What valuations were made on the property after repossession and at time of sale?

 What costs were involved in maintaining the property during the period between the repossession and the sale?

 Which Estate agents marketed the property?

 What offers were made on the property and why were they not accepted?

 How was the house marketed and sold and at what price?

 What costs were involved in selling the property?

 Has a claim been made against the indemnity insurance and how much was recovered?

 How has interest been calculated from the start of the arrears?

Please supply me with these details and a full breakdown of the balance claimed under the above account.

 

I look forward to receiving your reply as soon as possible.

 

Yours Faithfully

 

 

Silly Girl, Is the I do not acknowledge.. in the right place, should it be in bold?

Edited by perplexedofdorset
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just copy them in, don't do a covering letter, don't waste any more time worrying about the ;niceties' of this, they are sharks and you need to let them know you can be a parasite to them.... they leave parasites alone and go for the plankton instead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...