Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dont go near them bunch of scammers! ive removed ref. dx  
    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
    • 3rd one seems the best option, let 'em default, don't pay a penny, nothing will happen, forget about all of this. As for Payplan don't touch them with a bargepole, nothing they can do that you can't, and they will pocket fees. A do it yourself DMP is pointless as it will just string out the statute barred date to infinity.
    • Because that’s what the email said. Anyway it’s done now. Posted and image emailed.    im doing some reading in preparation for defence but I will need my hand holding quite tightly by you good people.  I’m a little bit clueless
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4602 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been a council tenant for 34 years now and have been in my present property for 15 years. I would like to move from the area but my daughters dont want to come with me. I would like to know if the council would let them take over the tenancy of our home, if me and my husband moved into another area?? Both my girls are over 21 years of age so are no longer children.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My first thought would be, almost certainly not. A council property isnt a "family home" and shouldnt be treated as such - it is social housing for those most in need of it.

 

Due to the start date of your current tenancy, I am not aware of any rights of succession - certainly not when the property is being voluntarily vacated. I presume the tenancy is in either just your own name, or yours and your husbands?

 

However, I need to add to this - I am not an expert on council tenancies, at all.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The tenancy is in my name but my husband gets the benefit to pay the rent on the house. My children were all with me when we moved into the property and they dont wish to move. (I know they used to let family members succeed the tenancy if they had lived with a person for two years and if the tenant died they could take it over but not sure about now)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that succession is only going to kick on upon the death of the tenant.

 

Moreover. Yes, this is a moral standpoint as opposed to legal, which I generally dont do, but as I work in the sector I have strong feelings on it. It would be inappropriate to my mind to allocate social housing to a party or parties for whom the property is not ideally suited. By this I mean, clearly the fact that there are currently 4 of you in the property means that the property is "OTT" for simply 2 people. You need to bear in mind (IMHO) that there will be people out there much more suited for the property than simply your two daughters, who are probably sat on a waiting list for such a property.

 

This is not judging btw, and sorry if it comes across that way - in your position I would be asking the exact same question. But seeing people day in day out in genuine need of such a property means I do feel the need to voice my opinion as to the unequitable nature of a decision that would allow only your two daughters to stay.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rumbler

 

I fully understand this can be upsetting but i would have to agree with Mr Sheds advice.

 

All you could really do is ask the council and see what their response is.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I do understand and would think the same way. I only ask as a young fella who lives nearby has sole tenancy of a 3 bed house which his step dad and brother was living in with him and they moved out as he found love with some lady and left the fella on his own and now he has a whole house to himself. I will no doubt have to ask the council if I cannot think of another way to rehome my girls. One of them is engaged so probably her fella would move in here as well, if I could transfer the tenancy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but what is stopping your daughters privatly renting something in the area, especially the one who is engaged, two wages coming in should ensure they could get something, why do you need to rehome your girls, you state they are over 21 and are no longer children so its up to them to get themselves sorted out - for goodness sake I was married at 17 and left the family home I have three sisters none of us expected our parents to rehome us, we did it our selves.

 

Sorry but I doubt they will be able to get the house due to the new under occupancy rules and I think you will also find that the young fella you mentioned will soon be moved to let a family that needs the house move there ( a good thing IMO)

Edited by Madamfluff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Could I just add my thoughts here, if you were able to sign your house over to your daughters, and that is a very big IF, you would then go straight to the bottom of any council/social housing list as you would have made yourself homeless, and more to the point you would not have a home to swap with another council/social housing tenant, so you would be the one in a hostel etc.....

I am not a solicitor :!::!:

 

Most of my knowledge came from this site :-D:-D

 

If I have been helpful in any way at all .............. Please click my star..... :-(:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly Madamefluff my daughter are over 21 yes,,, one works as a casual as and when needed ( no full time jobs going where she works) and my other daughter is unemployed, and undergoing hospital treatment. Yes I was also married at 18 but I was fortunate as with my husbands job he got a place for us to live in as well ,, so that was very handy for us. I dont have to find a home for my daughters I know as they will do it by themselves but I just wanted to see is anyone would be able to tell me how the law stands as to changing the tenancy. I would be moveing to another council property in a different area as I have had enough where I am now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rumbler

 

There really isnt much you could as the tenancy agreement is in your name all i could suggest is contact the council and ask their advice as ultimately its their decision.

 

Could i also suggest that they get as many applications forms filled out and hand in for council and different housing assotiations in the area to get their names on the housing list.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it, you would not be offered social housing by any other local authority, as you are not in need. Having an existing secure tenancy, you would be classed as voluntarily homeless, and refused rehousing. Nil points.

 

In my opinion, since you are not in genuine need, that policy is right on the money.

 

You are fully entitled to do the usual council tenancy swap, with someone from another district. There's nothing wrong in that, so go ahead. Your daughters should now be moving on to private rented properties, or can choose to go with you. Tenancy swaps are in many ways a good thing, as they do provide some mobility, at least, in the social housing sector.

 

Government policy used to be to encourage tenants to buy their own council house, and thereby achieve some genuine mobility as owner-occupiers. We seem to have taken a giant step backward from that modest degree of progress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Passing your home on to another person

 

When you die, your husband or wife, or one other

person in your family who has been living with you

for at least the last year, will usually be able to take

over the tenancy agreement from you. This is called

the right of succession and this can only happen once.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Passing your home on to another person

 

When you die, your husband or wife, or one other

person in your family who has been living with you

for at least the last year, will usually be able to take

over the tenancy agreement from you. This is called

the right of succession and this can only happen once.

 

this is correct. but new rules for under occupancy is creeping in and and councils are getting hot on it with their waiting lists getting bigger. best thing to do is call your local council and see were you stand on it.

its understandable you want to make sure your children are safe while you move on. which is what any parent would do

 

keep us updated

:???: what me. never heard of you never had a debt with you.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...