Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm trying to unravel this – but I get the impression that there was no contract between you and EVRi and that you didn't even choose them but instead you decided use some third party parcel broker in the USA which organised the delivery. Is this correct? EVRi came into the picture because they would then eventually selected for part of the journey although you had no knowledge that it might be them and I suppose it didn't really matter as long as the item got to you. Secondly, I really don't understand the journey which this item made. You bought the item from somebody in the USA. They then were meant to dispatch it to you to another address in the USA but for some reason or other it came to the UK and then into the hands of EVRi at which point it was lost or stolen. More confusion here because you now tell us that EVRi marked it as being out for delivery but it was never delivered. This suggests that it was going to be delivered to a UK address but earlier on you said that it was going to be delivered to USA address. I think you need to look at the story. Maybe show it to a friend of yours who is not particularly where the details and ask them if they can make head or tail of it and then come back to us with clarification so that we fully understand. Also, I think we'd like to know what the item is, how was it declared, what was the value which was declared. You said it was a valuable item because it was rare and collectable. I gather from this that it is non-fungible. We need to understand more about this. Was an insurance policy purchased to cover it during the delivery process. I understand that this rare and collectable item be valued at £200. Have evidence this value. This could become very important. Also you have given is no idea when this happened. We need to understand the full timescale. There are a number of possibilities here including the possibility of the contract action against EVRi on the basis of your third party rights or an action for negligence but we need to know far more and we need to get a story that makes sense.   Finally, I understand that you have sent the letter of claim. What did it say? How much time did you give them? What did you expect to happen as a result of the letter of claim? Whatever the answers to those questions might be, clearly you had no idea how to proceed after having sent such a letter. A letter of claim is meant to be a serious threat of some legal action if some condition which you have stipulated is not complied with. You set a deadline for compliance and at the end of that deadline you issue the court action. Clearly you are not in a position to do that so your letter of claim is a bluff and undermines your credibility and it will find its way into the EVRi wastepaper basket – if it's not there already.  
    • Good morning. I just wanted to check something please. The other side have moved slightly and negotiated a full and final offer price to end this matter. I am happy with this. However, I want to make sure this is the end of the matter and am emailing the following over to them prior to payment. Is this enough to ensure they can come back for nothing else? Thanks -------------------------------------------------- Dear Sir.   With regards your last email below.   I am pleased to agree to the full and final settlement figure given below.   Can you confirm this payment will be in full and final payment with no further claim to be brought against me in this matter?   Best regards
    • 100% sure I didn't receive it, that why my first post is with the £100 letter.
    • Engine, the technology business Starling Bank was built on, has been busy launching banks around the world, from Romania to Australia.View the full article
    • use this your WS and inc this as an exhibit off to bed now 3 nights been up till 4am aurora watching wont be on too early as it's lambing season out herding with the dog. your WS main thrust is the debt would now be SB'd , the DN was filed xxxyrs+months after it should have been thus unlawfully extending  SB date to infinity. highlight their admittance regarding errors at that time period in your 'redetermination'  paragraph. agreements unreadable. would have already been written off due to SLC age write off criteria has they not issued the claim to stop the SB clock when they had no paperwork to prove their case in the 1st place. never earned over threshold. dx       Erudio - stopped sending email deferments won at FOS DRN-4141462.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ingeus


Raven1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2474 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

kosebamse: Wait for the sanction letter from the JCP and then go through the reconsideration/appeal process. Point out that you had notified Ingeus in good time of a change of address and that you can not be held liable for their negligence. At the same time, lodge a formal complaint with the DWP regarding the incompetence of Ingeus in respect of failing to follow correct procedure and maintain accurate records.

 

As for part time education - You should be notifying the JCP as it comes under the heading of a "change of circumstances" and materially affects the hours you are available to look for work. Should Ingeus try to mandate and then sanction for an activity that would conflict with course work, the JCP will already have the information on record - All Ingeus needs to know is when you are available, so a letter stating when you are (un)available should suffice.

 

If they are wanting learning agreements and/or other documentation, I'd start to suspect they may be trying to claim ESF grants for something they did not do. You could ask on what grounds they require any learning agreements and how collecting personal information about yourself complies with the Data Protection Act in view of the fact you have not signed any DPA consent forms.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Another letter this morning and another doubt raised about my claim. This time it was for an appointment I did attend (job search) but my advisor had left before the appointment for whatever reason. Seems to be just an oversight where my advisor has forgotten to go back and record my attendance.

 

I will fill the in good reason letter and post it off tomorrow.

 

This is twice in the last few weeks where they have raised a doubt when they shouldn't have. Ingeus is a joke.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is twice in the last few weeks where they have raised a doubt when they shouldn't have. Ingeus is a joke.

 

Time to send the DWP a formal complaint stating that these two benefit doubts are vexatious and clearly demonstrates that Ingeus has no real process in place to verify a claimant's attendance. These nugatory doubts serve no purpose other than to increase animosity towards the provider and waste valuable time of DWP staff.

 

May also prove worthwhile sending a copy to your local MP.

  • Confused 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time to send the DWP a formal complaint stating that these two benefit doubts are vexatious and clearly demonstrates that Ingeus has no real process in place to verify a claimant's attendance. These nugatory doubts serve no purpose other than to increase animosity towards the provider and waste valuable time of DWP staff.

 

May also prove worthwhile sending a copy to your local MP.

 

It's something I will certainly consider. To be honest, I'm expecting another letter through in the next few days saying that the doubt no longer exists, but the fact is, it should never have been raised in the first place.

 

Funny you should say that, as Ingeus and my local MP share the same building!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Funny you should say that, as Ingeus and my local MP share the same building!

 

..let's hope they don't share the same records-keeping system!

 

Mr P - I consider myself an educated guy but had never heard that word 'nugatory' before - I admit I looked it up. It's a beauty and I shall start using it a lot from now on. Much obliged :) I'll try it on the advisor next time I attend the JC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, I've just received a letter asking me to come back to Ingeus (the joy) after an 8 week stint at HIT training, who were much nicer than Ingeus. I even got a Customer Service skills certificate out of HIT which is far more useful than anything Ingeus could ever offer.

I had only been with Ingeus for about 5 weeks prior to being sent of to HIT for 8 weeks, and now I'm back at Ingeus on Monday.

 

What is going to happen now? Will they ask me to come in more often? I didn't sign the consent forms on my first day so I'm going to make it as hard as possible for them to put me on any useless courses as I'm pretty proficient in English and interview skills already.

 

I need to get out of there ASAP! :sad:

Edited by katiejackson
Link to post
Share on other sites

So I've got sanction (I should've received the money yesterday) as per the posts above about my missing the first appointment but still haven't received the letter about being sanctioned?! Had the Ingeus manager not pointed this out to me, I wouldn't have known I was getting sanctioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been with Ingeus now for 2 weeks. In that time I have been made to attend 4 appointments. Going to Ingeus is similar to walking into a room full of double glazing salesmen. They are pushy, aggressive in their attitude with their payment at the forefront of their minds. Forever is the threat of sanctions to be held over your head. I am now booked onto a course for three days, then actually have to attend on the Friday, so in one week will be there for 4 days, and obviously this again is mandatory, I even have to attend on my day when I have to go to the job centre.

 

Ingeus do not have any thought to the person in front of them, it is all about them. They don't want to know you, or about you or what work is suitable, its about any work to get their commission. Their sales pitch is often flawed with subtle errors, and there is an underlying aggression and patronising attitude, I leave there feeling like I am nothing. An example of this, 'do you know how to write an envelope?' and do you know what speculate means? My task is to complete 150 envelopes ready to send out speculative letters. Yet there was a job advertised in the office that was of interest yet I was not allowed to pursue this, just get on with my 150 envelopes. Oh and my letter, this will be drafted next Friday, when I have to write this letter, stating my availability which will say 30 hours, even though the man knows I have 3 children and cant commit to 30 hours. At the moment I feel that once the letters have been drafted, I should take them home and then write on the bottom, 'Ingeus wrote this on behalf of the DWP' , I don't want to waste anyones time, but actually I am looking for work in school hours due to having 3 children.'

 

The thought of going in today with a group of people for a motivational course actually makes me feel sick, it is Ingeus that are making me feel ill and I cant emphasise enough what a despicable company they are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is just want they want Katie Jackson, to make life as difficult as possible, you then get a job, they get paid and your personal adviser gets his commission. I cant take it much more either, but to be fair I don't see the answer.......its just a case of soldering on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They want you at their beck and call

I am glad I am done

it was a pain when they want you in for a stupid half hour appointment and then kill time for 2 hours in time when they claim you could look around shops for vacancies, I could do this in about 15-20 minutes yet they didn't listen to me

Link to post
Share on other sites

'do you know how to write an envelope?' and do you know what speculate means?

 

Sure I do. Now the question is.... Can you* spell them for me or do you need to go and get a dictionary ?

 

*] The "you" here is the imaginary "adviser".

 

The attitude of these snake oil salesmen is precisely the reason I recommend everyone records the meetings and demand copies of all documents at every opportunity. A red pen is a valuable weapon to be used to correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

 

A4e used to be fond of saying "we will treat you how we ourselves expect to be treated" - O.K. "You want to patronise and insult me, I reserve the right to reciprocate. Do you even know what 'patronise' means ?".

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure I do. Now the question is.... Can you* spell them for me or do you need to go and get a dictionary ?

 

*] The "you" here is the imaginary "adviser".

 

The attitude of these snake oil salesmen is precisely the reason I recommend everyone records the meetings and demand copies of all documents at every opportunity. A red pen is a valuable weapon to be used to correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

 

A4e used to be fond of saying "we will treat you how we ourselves expect to be treated" - O.K. "You want to patronise and insult me, I reserve the right to reciprocate. Do you even know what 'patronise' means ?".

 

My advisor was reworking my CV a couple of months ago thinking they were something special, then I pointed out a simple grammatical error. Using "where" instead of "were". I could see them shifting awkwardly, whilst I felt about 7 feet tall in my chair. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, I've just received a letter asking me to come back to Ingeus (the joy) after an 8 week stint at HIT training, who were much nicer than Ingeus. I even got a Customer Service skills certificate out of HIT which is far more useful than anything Ingeus could ever offer.

I had only been with Ingeus for about 5 weeks prior to being sent of to HIT for 8 weeks, and now I'm back at Ingeus on Monday.

 

What is going to happen now? Will they ask me to come in more often? I didn't sign the consent forms on my first day so I'm going to make it as hard as possible for them to put me on any useless courses as I'm pretty proficient in English and interview skills already.

 

I need to get out of there ASAP! :sad:

 

I ended up being in there almost three days every week when I first started. Certainly two days at least. I started questioning the effectiveness of what I was being assigned to do, and showed I wasn't happy with it, and things suddenly changed to once a week.

 

I would guess they would put you on the standard workshops as so-called "motivational tools" and then have you send out a ridiculous and unreasonable amount of speculative letters and CVs. At the same time, having one-to-one advisor appointments to work on your CV and cover letter etc.

 

Just make sure you keep a record of everything, because if you read through my recent posts, they have tried to screw me over twice very recently. Firstly by raising a doubt over a non-mandatory activity I didn't attend (didn't follow DWP guidelines, so the doubt was dropped) and very recently, saying I didn't attend a job search appointment even though I did. (waiting the outcome of this).

 

And with that, I wish you good luck in getting away from here ASAP!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advisor was reworking my CV a couple of months ago thinking they were something special, then I pointed out a simple grammatical error. Using "where" instead of "were". I could see them shifting awkwardly, whilst I felt about 7 feet tall in my chair. :-)

 

Yeah, we hear a lot of that sort of nonsense on the forum. Or should that be "we here a lot of that sort of nonsense"?

 

The problem seems to be fundamental - a lot of advisers assume they must be cleverer than you because they have a job and you don't. Now, under the "any port in a storm" philosophy, I suppose I'd be prepared to take a job working for A4e or whoever. But I'd be awful at it because I wouldn't be happy to treat folks that way.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advisor was reworking my CV a couple of months ago thinking they were something special

 

On my first one to one appointment, my "adviser" promised to produce a CV for me by the next meeting - Having already seen some of their publications, my reaction was: Hell will freeze over before I let you anywhere near my CV, and as you know nothing about my employment history, that day is a long way off.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Antone's comment is spot on. Advisors see things in black and white; they have a job so they must be more able than you in all respects. We're all unemployed because we're totally ignorant, uneducated, lazy and can't run our lives without 'help'.

 

With my CV, one of Ingeus' 'improvements' was simply to reverse the order of my qualifications and job skills as they appeared. Of course, when I moved to another adviser she said 'Oh, you should never have your qualifications last on a CV, a professional would never do that'. I said 'Really? Well your colleague at the next desk did that so why don't you go over and tell her she's doing her job wrong'. Moment of fluster as she realised she'd put her foot in it.

 

I just let them change my CV however they wanted - I never used any of their versions.

 

Still doesn't beat the adviser at A4e who did an ex-shipyard worker's CV which had to state his skills were 'welding and brazing'...the adviser put 'welding and braising'. Nice combination; metalwork and cookery :) I pointed out her error and she denied she'd got it wrong..then checked it. Red face.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do we have to provide WP provdiers with our job seeking activity log?

Although it is sufficient for you to specify details of the Date, Organiation and Jobs that you have applied for (and/or newspaper adverts that you have referenced, agencies which have contacted), there is no requirement for you to disclose any confidential names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses. At most, you simply provide reference to such a document that you have either written down or printed.

 

Infact - just use the same job log which you present to Job Centre Plus when you sign on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On my first one to one appointment, my "adviser" promised to produce a CV for me by the next meeting - Having already seen some of their publications, my reaction was: Hell will freeze over before I let you anywhere near my CV, and as you know nothing about my employment history, that day is a long way off.

 

I can't help but notice their presentation slides are riddled with spelling mistakes and grammatical errors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Rebecca. One more question. Is it necessary to provide WP advisors with my CV at all? As far as I understand, I don't have to agree with them storing a copy of my CV on their system (which I'm being persuaded to consistently as well as asked to provide the email address)? During my last appointment, the advisor in the MAN letter typed 'kosebamse will upload CV to the system.' I've never either agreed to that or signed anything that would be in line with that sentence!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They want you at their beck and call

I am glad I am done

it was a pain when they want you in for a stupid half hour appointment and then kill time for 2 hours in time when they claim you could look around shops for vacancies, I could do this in about 15-20 minutes yet they didn't listen to me

 

Given the amount of empty shops now, there's no way it's going to take you two hours. For it to take me two hours, I'd also have to go to another city / town.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Rebecca. One more question. Is it necessary to provide WP advisors with my CV at all? As far as I understand, I don't have to agree with them storing a copy of my CV on their system (which I'm being persuaded to consistently as well as asked to provide the email address)? During my last appointment, the advisor in the MAN letter typed 'kosebamse will upload CV to the system.' I've never either agreed to that or signed anything that would be in line with that sentence!

If you have previously provided your email address, you can invoke your rights under the Data Protection Act to restrict any contact other than through written correspondence.

 

It is sufficient for you to provide, for cursory examination, a copy of a printed CV - however, you can invoke your rights not to provide a copy through email.

Edited by RebeccaPidgeon
Additional Information Submitted
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...