Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for the letter, that makes things a lot clearer. So it's a statutory demand rather than self-certifying. See what @Man in the middle thinks but to me, it seems as if the lawyer has a good strategy and seems to have covered all the bases. Although MitM thought you didn't need a lawyer, is s/he going to be at court wit you? HB  
    • Could you post up the letter, with your personal info and their reference covered up, please? It should say Letter of Claim, but let's have a look just in case. HB
    • I know dx, a lot of it was my partner and how she felt about it. I also appear to be addicted to my credit file being clean. I still worry for my partner she has too much on as it is, but I am ensuring I manage both of ours so She can forget about. i guess in terms of time I bet masses are defaulting with this economy as it is right now and high interest rates might be the only thing going for me right now. I guess  I’ll find out
    • Please see below for an extract from the letter more about my case. You have been convicted of two matters of failing to give driver details linked to two speeding offences and been disqualified in your absence. You confirmed that you did not receive the court documentation and the first you knew about the cases was on 3/6/24. As you can make a statutory declaration it is possible that we will be able to persuade the police to accept pleas to either or both of the speeding offences as they were committed within a very short space of time and withdraw the two fail to give driver details offences as normally if you plead to one or other of the speeding or fail to give driver details the prosecution will withdraw the other related offence. If successful you would not face a totting ban. In respect of the speeding offences, it could be argued they were committed on one occasion due to the proximity of the time and location and we may be able to persuade the prosecution to drop one of the speeding offences. You are technically guilty of all the offences because you accept it was you driving when the speeding offences were committed and that you did not update your change of address with the leasing company when it was your responsibility. If the prosecution will not withdraw the two failures to give driver details offences, you will face a totting ban but will be able to put forward an exceptional hardship argument. This  may or may not go ahead at the court hearing date, so we need to prepare for all eventualities. As a safeguard we have lodged the appeal and applied to suspend your ban pending appeal due to the time limit for being able to automatically appeal without getting leave of the Judge. The court have dealt with the matter very quickly and have actually listed your matter for an application to suspend the disqualification pending appeal on the above-mentioned date. We could actually use this date to make the statutory declaration in court having explained the situation to the magistrates and then see if the prosecution will agree to accept pleas to one or both of the speeding offences as a way of resolving the matter without the need for you to put forward an exceptional hardship argument. It is possible the case would need to be adjourned so that we can make those representations, or the court may want to go ahead and hear the exceptional hardship argument. The outcome of your case is always at the discretion of the Court.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ingeus


Raven1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2499 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

[...]since there wasn't any start of finish time on the MAN for this supervised jobsearch does that mean I can attend the seetec office do five minutes jobsearch print out 3 or 4 jobs and then leave the premises and claim my £6.30 travel fare ?

 

Get a signed & dated note to say that you attended on headed paper or a comps slip. If no start or finish time is stipulated, turn up at your convenience and leave when you want. I'd strongly recommend getting travel expenses refunded on the way in then you don't get held to ransom.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thanks for the reply Chester6 since there wasn't any start of finish time on the MAN for this supervised jobsearch does that mean I can attend the seetec office do five minutes jobsearch print out 3 or 4 jobs and then leave the premises and claim my £6.30 travel fair?

 

It's an appointment (and a mandatory one too), so there should always be a time stated to attend. Plus jobsearches usually involve booking computers so a time slot is even more desirable.The DWP WP Guidance states;

 

'The following steps must be taken on every occasion you want to mandate a participant to do something:

 

Ensure that the activity is reasonable in the participant’s circumstances

Ensure that the participant is aware of the sanctions consequences of failing to participate in a mandated activity

Notify the participant in writing on a Mandatory Activity Notification (MAN):

The specific action that they are required to undertake

When or by when they must undertake it'

They haven't given you an accurate indication of when you should undertake it if they've only put the date but not the time. Might pay you to go there early so that they can't try and claim you were 'late' if you turned up in the afternoon - I wouldn't put it past them. Personally I'd report them to the DWP for failing to state a time - you're not psychic so you need to know when to turn up. The few jobsearch appointments I had while at Ingeus always had both a date and time stated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to mention earlier that I was in my local Ingeus office today. I overheard two advisors talking to each other. One was bragging how they were close to achieving "gold" standard for the month. Sounded like they had nearly met the top target needed for returning clients to work, picking up a nice bonus along the way. The other advisor spoke of numerous warehouse vacancies becoming available and that they had sent all her best available clients already, and was only left with the "dregs", of whom they had no intention sending forward for interview.

 

Send your best clients for interviews so you can hit targets and get your bonus. "Park" those who need the most support and then brand them as "dregs" because you don't have the skills to work with such clients. Way to go Ingeus.

Unfortunately, Welfare To Work Clerks do not have Clients - and if some unsuspecting Job Seeker on the Work Programme is provided with an interview as a direct consequence of any effort on the part of any Welfare To Work Clerk this could be for any number of reasons. For example, through the Flexible New Deal A4E were found to guilty of arranging "placements" within a Business Unit set up by A4E, and then claiming the financial prize - one of the many instances of fraud.

 

In respect to the Work Programme - Welfare To Work Clerks do not have Clients, the Client is established by the Work Programme Contract between Job Centre Plus and the W2W Organisation. The candidate is only required to attend the Work Programme insofar as the Job Seekers Agreement remains in place. If a job seeker is offered an interview for a Warehouse Job, this has nothing whatsoever to do with whether the candidate is perceived to be "Best" or otherwise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys I eventually finished the work program this September just in time for me to come off esa and onto jsa

I am now on post work programme support at the jobcentre

and I have to say im not handling all this too well

i have to see my advisor on a weekly basis join universal job match they expect me to do 40 hrs job search a week

and they want evidence of all this

i asked for my exit report from the work program but they say they don't have it

this is so hard to deal with since i have been on esa the last 2 years with a broken leg and then to suddenly be expected to complete all these tasks is pretty heavy

i have all ready missed one appointment which resulted in my claim being closed so i had to rapid reclaim and it has left me without money for over 3 weeks

today i had to go to this post work program support interview and i haven't even had a penny of the job centre in 3 week so i had to walk or lose my money again

So because i have been on the work program 2 years even though i had a broken leg and was on esa there treating me as if i was on the work program on jsa and just couldn't be bothered looking for a job

yeah i was on the work program 2 years but i only set foot in the office about 5 time total i gained absolutely nothing from them not even a cv and because of this i have to do a more intense job search than any new claimer

I don't think i will be able to keep up with all the stuff they want me to do so a sanction is inevitable for me at some point

well i have had 2 years on the sick with a broken leg so soon as the heat gets to much im going to my doctors for a sick note for stress and depression its not what i want but

i just feel victimised at present

stuck in the house for 2 years then expected to jump through all these hoops is taking a fair toll on my mental health add the fact they want me to attend appointments when i have not even received my jsa and am pennyless

sorry for the rant im just very depressed at the moment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you've had the same experience of the work programme as the rest of us had - totally useless. I still can't understand how jobcentres can ask some claimants to do very little while others they come down really heavy on.

 

Regarding your exit report, you should have had a copy fron the work provider. It's not an option for them, they have to do it. here's an extract from the guidance rules;

 

'Copy of Exit Report for Participant

There is one small policy change in respect of giving the participant a copy of their Exit Report. Current guidance states all participants must receive a copy of the report but some of you pointed out this would mean potentially a lot of sensitive information going out by post.

To minimise the risk of their Exit Report not being received or received at the wrong address. Participants should be provided with a copy of the Exit Report where you are in face to face contact with the participant or let participants know by post that they are entitled to a copy of the Exit Report on request and make arrangements for the report to be collected or posted. Before posting ensure the participant is aware of the risks of sending personal information via post.'

 

I'd also be asking why the jobcentre say they haven't got a copy either; this report is supposed to cover your two years on the programme and give them information about you, where you need help, etc so they would need it before deciding what steps you now need to take - seems like they've just gone ahead without it, which is wrong.

 

Contact the work program people again, as you're entitled to have a copy of your exit report. It probably won't say much (they never do) but you still want to see it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you've had the same experience of the work programme as the rest of us had - totally useless. I still can't understand how jobcentres can ask some claimants to do very little while others they come down really heavy on.

 

 

Dunno about the JC, but ingeus seems to come down heavier on the younger ones than us older ones.

 

At our ingeus they seem to put pressure on the yonger ones. why? cos they see more chance of a bonus out of them sad but true...:|

 

Which reminds me i have an ingeus appointment this afternoon :sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dunno about the JC, but ingeus seems to come down heavier on the younger ones than us older ones.

 

At our ingeus they seem to put pressure on the yonger ones. why? cos they see more chance of a bonus out of them sad but true...:|

 

Which reminds me i have an ingeus appointment this afternoon :sad:

In general terms, if the Welfare To Work Clerk is quite inexperienced (if they were remotely experienced and qualified, they would be working in the Real World), they more than likely feel that they can badger younger candidates than candidates who are older, more mature, more experienced and more qualified than they are - and are less likely to deal with any confrontation that they can't win.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In general terms, if the Welfare To Work Clerk is quite inexperienced (if they were remotely experienced and qualified, they would be working in the Real World), they more than likely feel that they can badger younger candidates than candidates who are older, more mature, more experienced and more qualified than they are - and are less likely to deal with any confrontation that they can't win.

 

Its because they know employers want young staff who they can mould to what they want....at the end of the day its all about bonuses at ingeus!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to mention earlier that I was in my local Ingeus office today. I overheard two advisors talking to each other. One was bragging how they were close to achieving "gold" standard for the month. Sounded like they had nearly met the top target needed for returning clients to work, picking up a nice bonus along the way. The other advisor spoke of numerous warehouse vacancies becoming available and that they had sent all her best available clients already, and was only left with the "dregs", of whom they had no intention sending forward for interview.

 

Send your best clients for interviews so you can hit targets and get your bonus. "Park" those who need the most support and then brand them as "dregs" because you don't have the skills to work with such clients. Way to go Ingeus.

 

I hear this all the time at my ingeus, yesterday when i went my advisor and another one. where discussing what they were going to spend their monthly bonus on...

 

As both had done really well this month......then one decided it was enough to do her entire xmas shopping in one go, she then turned to me and said, oh dont you just love christmas! to my reply no i bloody dont seeing as i cant afford it!!! :mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its because they know employers want young staff who they can mould to what they want....at the end of the day its all about bonuses at ingeus!

Although Welfare To Work Clerks do not have the capacity to know what employers want.... you make a perceptive point about employers obsessed with recruiting ideal staff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh dont you just love christmas! to my reply no i bloody dont seeing as i cant afford it!!! :mad2:

 

In the words of Delia Smith - Take it firmly by the legs then stuff it.

 

I find Christmas to be a tiresome ritual full of seasonal disappointment and false hope... But at least I will have a little bit of work in December.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

W2W such as Ingeus makes many feel paranoid and like they are out to get you it seems

It's understandable to feel like that considering they are trying to trip people up and try to sanction regardless of how wrong the sanction is

Plus each scheme is worst then the one before in general. I have only found my local seetec to be worse though people wise (only 3 at Ingeus are irredeemably bad), one called me a liar cos he was too lazy to talk to his colleague, one pretended to be a nice guy until he never informed I was with a new adviser and then he made it obvious talking to me was the last thing he wanted and the one who didn't condemn homophobia at a job interview from seetec period. Interview prep can't always help when the interviewer is a bad rude one

 

this is exactly how i feel, i just want to get a job asap so i don't have to deal with the likes of ingeus anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is exactly how i feel, i just want to get a job asap so i don't have to deal with the likes of ingeus anymore.

 

Same here

I keep applying and looking but I keep having to do stupid courses and waste of time forced labour which is taking time away and a pointless distraction mostly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although Welfare To Work Clerks do not have the capacity to know what employers want.... you make a perceptive point about employers obsessed with recruiting ideal staff.

 

I have kept in contact with all 10 of the people i was on a recent WP course i was on, 4 are under 24 the others are my age or above....we all see the same advisor at Ingeus and all of are looking for retail work...

 

Now the younger ones are regularly put forward for interviews, bearing in mind 4 of them have never worked in a shop before.

so it cant be cos of experience they are choosen, none of us older ones ever get put forward for interviews...and yes we've asked and they fob us off with excuses time and time again.....we all know its because they can see a big fat bonus from the younger ones!

Edited by Charlotte_Henderson
Link to post
Share on other sites

Under 21, and the employer can get away with paying £5.03 per hour. For anyone older, the minimum wage is £6.31. Younger candidates are more likely to tolerate poor working conditions due to inexperience of regulation and what is acceptable. Retailers that target the younger market will want staff that can "connect with customers" and are in tune with the current trends...

 

Youths on the shop floor is one reason I take my complaints out with the manager - Currently berating one store over the display of axes & hammers that are likely to cause injury if a small child runs around. Also causing trouble in a poundland store for leaving piles of plastic & packaging lying around after stacking shelves... Guess I won't ever get offered jobs in those stores :becky:

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under 21, and the employer can get away with paying £5.03 per hour. For anyone older, the minimum wage is £6.31. Younger candidates are more likely to tolerate poor working conditions due to inexperience of regulation and what is acceptable.

 

Which of course is the correct answer :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have kept in contact with all 10 of the people i was on a recent WP course i was on, 4 are under 24 the others are my age or above....we all see the same advisor at Ingeus and all of are looking for retail work...

 

Now the younger ones are regularly put forward for interviews, bearing in mind 4 of them have never worked in a shop before.

so it cant be cos of experience they are choosen, none of us older ones ever get put forward for interviews...and yes we've asked and they fob us off with excuses time and time again.....we all know its because they can see a big fat bonus from the younger ones!

Sadly, Welfare To Work Clerks do not have the capacity to know what employers want.... but you still make a perceptive point. I suspect that if the W2W Clerk that you are referring to had the competence to pick up the telephone to speak to an employer, they would be not employed as a W2W Clerk.

 

For the case that you mentioned, it is possible that the Employer Services Team could have seen a vacancy advert from a local retailer (lets assume a Fashion Outlet, targeted towards the younger demographic), within which they specify the need for Zero Hour Staff filled by inexperienced school leavers (or under 25s) - although age discrimination in employment legislation would make such an advert illegal, I am not sure whether any candidate older than 25 would feel particularly welcome by such an employer - even if a faux interview was arranged.

 

However, from what you say, there may be a case for you to report Ingeus for promoting Age Discrimination in Employment

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/wales/work_w/work_discrimination_e/age_discrimination_at_work.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also causing trouble in a poundland store for leaving piles of plastic & packaging lying around after stacking shelves...

 

The correct procedure Mr P is to entangle oneself in said packaging and fall heavily to the ground shouting, on the way down, "this is gonna cost ya!". :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The correct procedure Mr P is to entangle oneself in said packaging and fall heavily to the ground shouting, on the way down, "this is gonna cost ya!". :lol:

Better to have the witnesses say "this is gonna cost ya!" whilst Mr P is writhing in agony on the foor.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...