Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I applied to the Court to act as litigation friend has my son is Severely Mentally Impaired and sent the proof they requested from his GP so I thought this might have been accepted without a hearing. I cannot believe the claimant is still convinced my son was the driver.
    • I had to call an ambulance for my wife, but one of the paramedics was not happy, about the condition of our house, as it's cluttered. And he  would only see to my wife, on the ambulance itself. After diagnosis they took my wife to hospital. My wife was ill for a few months, and received help from the district nurses. We then got a call from a social worker, who wanted to visit us, and discuss ways to make my wife more comfortable. When I asked for more details, she became vague, but could give us a phone number, if she visited. I politely declined her offer, as I was coping, along with my daughter in caring for my wife. Then a letter arrived from another social worker, saying similar things, to the first. I didn't bother to reply. Another letter has just turned up, from the social services legal department, which doesn't say anything specific, but refers to the other social workers trying to visit us. Coming from a legal department, has badly upset my wife, who's recovery was on going, and she now fears that someone will be coming to the house, to do whatever. Do we have to respond, or take notice of these people. Also we recently had a fire prevention officer come and fit, smoke and heat detectors. He didn't voice any concerns with the conditions at the property. Worried, Paul.
    • By not sticking to the deadline which you set you have lost credibility. Your letter of claim becomes one of hundreds of others which they receive and which they put in the bin because they think that you are just bluffing.  
    • 05.05.24 Ever so sorry if I have entered this in the wrong part of this website.   My grandfather is in his 70's and retired.  He asked me to help him find a work pension that he was paying into when he was working. From 1967 - 1982 he worked for a Fabric Dying Company, Celanese, Spondon Derby UK. I have already used the GOV.uk Trace Pension Scheme. It listed a few pension companies : Akzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme formerly Courtaulds Pension Scheme.  I do not fully understand how this works but I think this scheme is administer by a company called Willis Tower Watson. We have called this company, got through to the pension department submitted all my grandfather's details (D.O.B. , N.I. no. etc.) but that agent tells that they have no record of my grandfather and ask what is the name of the pension scheme. Here is the problem, his home was burgalled in 2005 and a briefcase which contained his legal documents was stolen. So he does not know who was the Pension Scheme company. I have a this phone number 01332 681 210 for Celanese but it just rings and never gets answered. So I am asking for help if anyone can tell us where we can try next. I am also hoping for a massive long shot that one of them members on this website, worked for or knows someone who worked for British Celanese Spondon Derby and could tell us of any pension company. Thanks for any help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Insurance Companies and their 'admin' fee's for come what may....How can we charge them for admin?


Deb T
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4716 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

when you obtain a quote?

 

I just filled in the various details with an insurance company for an online quote and whom I'm already insured with for a vehicle and at the end of the quote there is the usual ticking the box if you don't want to be on their marketing list but now there is an added box of

 

To assess your insurance application and the terms on which cover may be offered, we may obtain information about you from credit reference agencies to check your credit status and identity. The agencies will record our enquiries. This will not affect your credit standing.

 

How long has this been going on for? Needless to say I've not continued with the quote.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some have been doing this for the last 5 years or so. It started out as being a check on identity and has since moved on to check rating, not only to decide whether credit for monthly payment can be offered, but also to have a bearing on premiums. As an example, if you had a poor credit record/rating, it is highly possible that some of the major Insurers e.g. Direct Line, Aviva, will not offer monthly payment option or the best premium rates.

 

This applies if you obtain quotes directly from Insurers or via comparison sites. If you use a comparison site for quotes, you may see a number of entries on your credit record for companies conducting basic checks.

 

The advice for those with adverse credit record entries and affected credit ratings, is to go the old fashioned route and use a decent local broker.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the first time I've seen it, I'll have to pay more attention to the disclaimers at the bottom.

 

So, the questions that go begging is if you have an established insurance record with your insurer and you then go for a quote...will they credit search you then and if they do then why? and at the same time as this the quote when given should be as a pay all in one go basis, if you require terms they should then 'possibly' reach for the search button but only when you're asking for terms.

 

Yet another back door for credit reference agencies to log details on you, if you think about it insurance is a complete joke at the best of times, most if not all people end up coming worse off when a claim is made and they offer you terms and you dont pay and then there is a claim...do you see the insurers honouring the claim? any excuse to get out of it would be them.

 

I've had house insurance for 15 years, bricks and mortar and contents, I've never made a claim and yet the last few years they've put the price up claiming fraudulent claims...yeah right. How many houses suffer a total loss? My house and contents insurance this year was over £400, I asked them to quote without the contents and they reduced it by £22 ...I asked for a separate quote for the contents and they wanted £110 ....it's a joke, I shopped around and got the bricks and mortar for £128 and the contents I have dispensed with, I've never made a claim, the insurers want you to jump through hoops with door locks/window locks, safes and so on.

 

Insurance is money for old rope if you ask me.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think Insurers conduct credit checks on existing policy records. It is only if you requested a new quotation and this was a separate record that they would conduct the search.

 

My experience with Insurance is to shop around each year and unless you have reasons for loyalty, arrange cover elsewhere. Once you have been with one company for a few years, I am sure that they pick up on the loyalty being shown, by increasing the premiums. The Insurance pricing staff mess around with pricing all the time and IT is updated/changed regularly, so you can end up with unjustified increases. When you ask about the premium changes, you get the issues you have mentioned in your post.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, Uncle Bulgaria. We check the premium each year and then ring the incumbent company to say that their renewal premium seems out of line with the market. Each year it seems that they are able to match a lower price we've been quoted.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Our house insurance was due for renewal in March, we didn't receive a renewal notice.

 

Next we get a document stating the policy had lapsed, no problem, we phoned around and our insurers were the cheapest, so we took out the policy with them.

 

We have been insured with this insurer on the house policy continually for 10 years, no claims made ever.

 

When the insurance document came through it had a problem with the date, it showed us as insured for just one day and that the renewal was next year on the same date.

 

We called them, asked that they send out the correct documentation and reflecting the date as correct. Two weeks later the document arrives, same error as before.

 

So, repeat

 

We called them, asked that they send out the correct documentation and reflecting the date as correct. Two weeks later the document arrives, same error as before.

 

So, repeat

 

We called them, asked that they send out the correct documentation and reflecting the date as correct. Two weeks later the document arrives, same error as before. This time we requested to speak to a supervisor, not one available and we'd get a call back...we didn't get the call back.

 

So called them back, spoke to their supposed customer complaints dept who 'could see the problem and would rectify it accordingly and we'd get the documents soon' they also said that it doesn't matter that the document is wrong because they know it's right....which may well be the case but a document is a document and should it ever need to be referred to they could so very easily deny it etc....idiots.

 

Today we've had two documents received, One showing the same feckin error as the last three times and a further document simply stating the period insured for, the level of cover and this one gives 2 days cover...nice!

 

Each time we phone them it take about 20 mins on average to get through to them, it takes a further ten minutes to speak explain the problem, go through the security checks and blah blah...this is time consuming ...but now and due to the amount of times they've got it wrong is bordering on being grossly incompetent.

 

What route in ? I'd like to charge them for my time as they're charging me for theirs etc.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why not write?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a house insurance policy (see other thread) where there is a date issue on the length of cover....which is currently ongoing..

 

But there is a second issue.

 

On the document it tells me that we have no qualified for 10% no claims discount. We've been insured with this company for 10 years continuous .

 

Some years it's in my name, other years it's in my partners name, depends who calls them to renew, but the other party is always named on the policy as joint policy holder.

 

This year, we renewed about 10 days after the policy had lapsed, but it was a 'new policy' because the policy had gone over the renewal date. No problem, if the other renews it's always a new policy anyway.

 

In any case, I asked them why the 10% discount had not been applied ...these are the answers they gave...when I answered each one of their points they came up with a new answer.

 

A/ Because it was a new policy

It may be a new policy but this year it was renewed by the same person as last year and under their ( insurers) own terms and conditions the 10% no claims is still applicable up to 90 days after their last policy expired...the policy was taken out ten days after the last policy expired.

 

B / The discount was applied but it wont show until next year.

So if we dont insure with you next year how will we benefit from the 10% discount?

 

C:/ The discount was applied, it just doesn't show on the policy but it has been applied I assure you.

When we receive the document we get a covering letter asking us to ensure that all the details are correct, the document quite clearly states 'No No claims discount applicable, who

is right? you or the document?

 

D:/ We will call you back later today:

One week later, no call back and no message left on the ansafone.

 

E: Our underwriters have stated we don't qualify due to the times lapsed since renewal

But in your terms and condtions of the policy it quite clearly states that 10% discount will apply if no claims are made on the previous years insurance and that this remains in force for up to 90 days from the previous none claimed on policy expiring.

 

I asked them to speak to their underwriters who naturally are not customer facing,

 

oh, and

F: / Sorry, you dont qualify for the discount because their are leaves on the line

 

Who can I take this up with? I don't intend to let it go but getting to speak to people a little higher up than the customer service drones is difficult, often they just pass you to another colleague who is no more senior than them.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have ..but they have so many offices that all seem to deal with the same issues....testament to that is the last document they sent was sent specially to us to counter the previous documents, as in adifferent letter stating the period of insurance...but no admission of a problem...no apologies....................and still fecking wrong.....they doubled the cover from one day to two days...when in reality it should be 365 days (or 364)

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have heard of similar problems many times with companies. The computers these guys use, just cannot produce accurate documents and often some of the information in front of them is so unclear, they are guessing. Hence the number of different replies you have received about the 10% discount.

 

Suggest that in view of the inconsistent/unclear service you have received that you follow the Insurers complaints process by sending a written complaint in. Suggest to them they have failed under the 'treating customers fairly' agenda, which is something they should be taking seriously, as they have to log breaches, where a customer has complained about being messed around in the way that you have. You may receive some form of compensation as a result.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

See other thread reply for advice. Written complaint.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The solution is to sue them in the County Court. They arte clearly in breach of contract because in addition to insuring you they are obliged to conduct the business correctly and provide a reasonable standard of service. So sue them for a very modest amount - £50 which will be enough that they don't go to court but that they will get their act together and also they will pay you the £50 and your claim fee in order to settle.

 

It would be a nice little exercise for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...