Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hamptons Legal


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4725 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Red/Lowell Financial/Lowell Portfolio 1/Hamptons Legal/Phillips Bailiff and Debt Recovery/

 

they are the must illegal debt collection agency i have ever dealt with in my life

 

they sent me a letter for my mobile phone debt saying they dont need to prove the debt abnd pay up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, sorry Bazooka, I got a bit paranoid and thought I'd put too much detail in the original post so deleted it.

Back in 2000 I lost my job and couldn't continue payments to my bank an for an overdraft, personal loan & credit card. They defaulted and shortly after this I got a new job I agreed over the phone to pay a certain amount per month which would have cleared the debt in 5 years (the total amount payable included significant default and interest charges including numerous £35 fees for sending letters etc. but they agreed to hold the interest from then on). This arrangement was with the banks in-house solicitors / DCA and did not get as far as a CCJ.

I continued with these payments for 4 and 1/2 years during which time I never received a statement of balance or any communication whatsoever. At the 4 & 1/2 year mark I realised that I must be getting pretty close to clearing this so requested a balance as I was considering making one final payment to finish it off. However I was told over the phone that the balance was an amount close to 60% of the original amount from back in 2000! I was astounded so took advice and sent them the CCA letter together with fee (recorded & signed for) and received nothing other than a letter showing the balance they had told me over the phone less the fee I had enclosed. I sent them the relevant follow up letter (again recorded and signed for) and have paid them nothing nor heard or received anything from them since.

Now after almost 5 years I have had letters from Hamptons (Lowells, thanks Bazooka) threatening me with bankruptcy and a charging order. I suspect they have bought it for pennies and are trying their arm as it won't be statute barred for another year or so with my last payment being in 2005.

I totally dispute owing this money as I paid back a hell of a lot more than I borrowed and also they have no proof as far as I know that I owe anything. Do these people have me by the short & curlies? I've heard horror stories about statutory demands & charging orders.

I would appreciate it if you could shed any light on this, thanks so much!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, have you got proof of all of your payments to them?

Did you pay via the bank using direct debit or standing order, cheque?

 

These clowns who have it in their grubby mitts now, are as much use as indicators on a submarine and have all the power of a blown light bulb!

 

They've rattled the wrong cage if they think they can simply demand money without breaking a sweat.

 

Dispute it with them, send them this,http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?426-A-letter-when-the-account-has-been-passed-to-another-debt-collection-agency you can send it 2nd class post but you MUST obtain "Proof of posting" from the post office counter, this will be your legal proof that they received it.

 

You could really stick it to them for acting the fool, and claim back ALL of the charges that were added to your account from your bank! And tell the bank that they can thank lowlifes for your claim, as without their puerile greed you would have kept quiet!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, I was paying by direct debit every month for 4 & 1/2 years but don't have any statements as it was from so long ago (2000-2005) and didn't expect them to try and pull my pants down like this!

 

The original bank can't have any proof I owe this or they would have provided it years ago, they just piled on masses of charges and hoped I would pay but when I challenged them they just disappeared. I wasn't worried about these letters from Lowells at first, I just saw them as a sad attempt by these soulless robot parasites to get something for nothing but when I read about statutory demands and charging orders my bum clenched a bit because it seemed they could attempt these without proof that the debt is even mine!

 

I will get that letter sorted and sent out, thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have a very very long way to go before they can even magic this in front of a DJ, then they have to continue with their magic act and attempt to foll the DJ that there is even a debt!

 

Keep an eye on your credit file (CRF) if Lowlifes have been even more incompetent than usual and left their footprints all over it, then you will be eligible to sue them for damages!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say they have searched your file, how many times exactly and in what sort of time frame?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have been on my experian file and done 7 searches in total in the last 7 months. 4 of them are on my current address and 3 of them are on my previous address. They are listed as unrecorded enquiries.

 

Its says on Experian that any searches of my credit report should have been made with my consent. Also it says that searches are either related to credit applications I recently made or routine checks by lenders on accounts I already have. None of this applies to Lowell Portfolio 1. Can anything be done?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you would like to think so wouldn't you, but the truth of the matter is that DCA's pay money to credit reference agencies to search peoples credit files, the CRA's don't care who or why a company wants to search your file, as long as you pay them, exactly the same as the DVLA giving out info to anyone requesting it subject to the correct fee being paid.

 

Start a formal complaint with the CRA, exhaust it until you reach the ICO and continue the complaint with them, true that an unrecorded search can only be seen by you and the fool who searched it, but you rightly state, you have never given this clown outfit your permission to do so, nor are they in the business of offering you credit!.

 

Drop a line to your local MP also, see if they will raise the issue in the commons, they might just be able to force the CRA's to be truly independent and act within the law.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this doesn't help solve the problem but having learned a bit about this outfit it seems they have somehow convinced themselves they are sincere, professional and have the moral high ground. There must have been a few ounces smoked at that team meeting, especially as the management are probably tax dodging, yuppie Alan Sugar wannabe's and the staff are probably people who failed the initial interview at Sports Direct and spend their time dreaming of getting laid while practising on their Mum's dog (probably a Pomeranian as bullies like to impose themselves on smaller creatures!)

 

There's nothing like a good old fashioned generalisation, I wonder how far away I am?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi folks,

 

While I'm waiting for a response to my letter I'd like to ask a question about proof of debt in the mean time please if anyone can help.

 

In court what is accepted as proof that the debt is owed?

 

Also if they do have some form of acceptable proof, what is deemed as proof that the actual amount owed is what the DCA says it is?

 

From reading other threads on here it seems a DCA can issue a SD whether they can prove the debt or not which sounds outrageous to me! Surely a court should hammer a DCA for going down this route when they can't prove the amount owed or even any debt at all!

 

Thanks again everyone for taking the time to read this and help me out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The "Actual" credit agreement, NOT a copy, although if they can prove that there has been a relationship (financial) between you and them then that might just sway some DJ's, unfortunately it is down to the DJ lottery and just how solid your defence is.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks Bazooka. So if they have no credit agreement would this proof of financial relationship need to show the amount owed with payments made in the form of statements or such? Otherwise my old milkman could say I owe him ten grand just because I paid him a fiver a week for a couple of years!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would need to show, that YOU made payments to them, or, they made payments to you, a financial relationship is 'usually' where someone obtains credit from another.

(landlords-tenants excluded)

 

So if say Natwest took me to court for allegedly owing them 10k, then I know, that I have never banked with them, and that they would have to show the court the original credit agreement, or, some sort of payment from them to me, tying me to an account that I owe.

 

I am not sure as to how long this 'relationship' would need to be proved, BUT I would certainly think that one single payment/transaction would NOT be enough to argue that this financial relationship existed.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Bazooka, you've cleared that up. So If Natwest claim I owed them 10k, have paid 6k and still owe them 4k. But I claim I only owed them 6k in the first place and have paid it all off, Natwest would have to provide the original credit agreement for 10k or some payment history between me and them on an account of 10k for a judge to agree with them that I still owe them 4k?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They would most definitely have to prove where the other 4k came from! Disputed accounts are often remedied before court action anyhow.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have also had a letter off a debt collection agency for an outstanding debt on a catalogue, the letter reads that they have obtained my credit file and that if i dont pay they will send the bailiffs round i phoned them and said the ebt is charges because the catalogue company screwed up and they said that they would investigate, however i aid are you allowed to acess my credit file and the man said he was looking at it, and even read back to me credit i now have, he then said if you dont pay you could go to prison, what do i do? i have got into debt after having cancer and being off work, my bank Halifax have just withdrawn our overdraft leaving us with a £4600 debt, i had to switch to a new account. they said it was brecause we fell behind with our credit cards, it was because i had cancer and was off sick, any advice would be great......

Link to post
Share on other sites

the letter reads that they have obtained my credit file and that if i dont pay they will send the bailiffs round he then said if you dont pay you could go to prison, what do i do?

 

WOW! Did you not laugh so hard you did a little squirt of wee in your underpants?

 

That is absolutely classic BS, they CANNOT send bailiffs, and they most certainly CANNOT put you in prison for being in debt!

 

First things, DO NOT talk to these little children on the phone again EVER ! They will simply fill your head with other nonsense they heard in the playground like the moon is made of cheese, and if you tell a l ie a fairy will die and you get a spot on your tongue!

 

Secondly DO NOT speak to them over the phone.

And finally DO NOT speak to them over the phone.

 

Make a formal complaint about these puerile clowns to the OFT&TS via http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Dl1/Directories/UsefulContactsByCategory/Governmentcitizensandrightscontacts/DG_195948

 

If you can start your own post then others will see it and advise you.

 

But in a nutshell, keep EVERYTHING in writing only, keep a diary of events, START a formal complaint with the bank, and exhaust it fully, you need to be able to escalate this to the FOS to investigate, Shallowfax are quite possibly the worst bank to have to deal with when you ask for help in a time of crisis. I still owe them in excess of 50k, but due to their stupidity, incompetence and immaturity they are still yet to comprehend the laws of "Honesty" & "Good manners".

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

another Hamptons problem here, i have received a letter from Hamptons Legal concerning a Kays Catalogue debt, i did ring them (found this site afterwards) and they are investigating the case because the fees on teh Kays account are all charges caused by kays, anyhoo, the letter says they have a copy of my credit file from Eperian and that they will use that to see what other financial committments i have and then get bailiffs round, i know they cant go down the bailiff route, the debt is £160 but can they get my credit file i havent as yet accessed my credit file. what does everyone think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...