Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Jobseekers doubt


Ubiquitious
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4809 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good evening.

 

Today I received a letter from the jobcentre that they think I may have left my job voluntaraly. The letter states that until they make a decision they will continue to pay me.

 

I have been signing on and received a seperate letter that I am entitled to contribution based JSA.

 

I left my previous job as I had an offer of employment else where. Unfortunately the new job fell through as it turned out I had only been driving 6 months and the new company could not get insurance for a company car (the perfect job fell through!) and therefore could not employ me.

 

The company I was with (a small company) did inform me prior to this that due to a decrease in work load I would soon be made redundant unless things changed (which prompted me to look for a new job).

 

Unfortunately after I left to take my new position they could not give me my old job back.

 

I have spoken to my previous employers and they will confirm if asked by the jobcentre that in all liklihood I would have been made redundant.

 

The job fell through in January. I claimed JSA in March (if that makes any difference).

 

What happens next and what investigations will the JC make? Will they ask me to fill out a form or speak to my previous employer? (I filled out a form stating the above story at my first meeting)

 

If I am found to have left my job voluntarily what are the sanctions they will impose?

 

How long will this all take?

 

Will this affect my housing and council tax benefit?

 

They have paid me for 10 days and on the phone after signing on today have stated that the usual £130 will be sent for payment today. If I am sanctioned will they attempt to claw this back?

 

Thanks for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sanctions are not backdated, so they will not take back what they have already paid, they will withhold payment from the point the sanction has applied, so if they decided today to apply a 4 week sanction, it means they will not pay you for the next 4 weeks

 

in relation to hb/ctb, these will not be withheld, just ensure you let the council know about the sanction so they can update your details

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no time limit on how long the decision can take to be made.

The decision making team may decide from the ES84JP form you completed that they have sufficent information to make a decision or if there any further enquiures they will write to you for further information.

If a sanction is applied to your claim it can be anything from a 2 weeks period to a 26 week period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope not. Although I stated as said above on that form I did fill it in briefly and did not provide supporting evidence (such as job offer) as I did not have it on me at the time (I was told to only bring CV, P45 and ID)! I did ask the person whom I was having the interview with and they said it should not matter. Now this letter.

 

Grrr.

 

I did like my 25k a year job and had no urge to live on pretty much nothing. Would that not be odvious to the decision team?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not a decision maker but I do refer cases to the DM team for all types of cases, this is a standard procedure and the letter your received is to advise you that your case has been referred.

When you made the claim the contact centre do not have any part in their script that covers information you may need to provide regarding thr reasons whjy previous employment ended.

I am not able to indicate what decision is likely and only the DM will know when they receive your referral and start to mae a determination on your claim.

If you are sanctioned you have the right to request a reconsideration and claiom hardship whilst waiting for the reconsideration outcome decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must have a case or your claim would not have been accepted. If you leave a job voluntarily you have no entitlement to JSA. Never mind sanctions, you cannot claim at all.

Same is true if you are dismissed for gross misconduct. In short, gettting sacked or leaving work means no benefit entitlement at all.

 

If I'm wrong here, someone please correct me (flumps?).

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must have a case or your claim would not have been accepted. If you leave a job voluntarily you have no entitlement to JSA. Never mind sanctions, you cannot claim at all.

Same is true if you are dismissed for gross misconduct. In short, gettting sacked or leaving work means no benefit entitlement at all.

 

If I'm wrong here, someone please correct me (flumps?).

 

It is wrong, I'm afraid - but it's a common misunderstanding. People who leave work voluntarily are able to claim JSA and if any claim is refused on this basis, it should be challenged. The consideration of a sanction will look at the reasons why the person left and decide whether JSA should be sanctioned (non payment of benefit) for a period of time. If it is decided that the person left without good cause, a sanction will be applied. If it is decided that they left with good cause, a sanction will not be applied. During the course of a sanction the jobseeker is still expected to adhere to the JSAg but will not receive any monetary benefit until the sanction period has expired.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, it's what a lot of people think. There's a lot of people I've dealt with in this situation who come to me destitute and I ask them if they have claimed JSA, the response is: "My mate/brother/cousin/woman at the council (delete as appliable!) told me I wouldn't get it because I left my job of my own accord". The other one I frequently hear is people who come to me for help appealing a sanction because they left their employment over 6 months ago and feel that the sanction shouldn't be applied. They have normally been misadvised that leaving volunatarily means that cannot get JSA for six months. They are confusing this with the maximum period of a sanction (26 weeks which is approx 6 months). A sanction cannot be applied until after JSA is claimed and is applicable from the date of the decision, not from when a person left employment.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest jsa12

they wont claw the money back,stress is one reason they have to take into account in leaving a job if you are sanctioned you should always appeal against this,the adjudication process should always be scrutinised closely as they will try and withhold as much as they can about their decisions and let you see the minimum indeed when i encountered this the decision maker was on the phone advising the "customer service" adviser to let me see only certain sections' and the only response i received was "bet you wont do that again" while in conversation with the "decision maker", however when the truth finally emerged perhaps inadvertently the decision maker decided to make up her own version of advents ignored the evidence in my doctors letter, stated inaccuracies.needless to say the "decision" was quickly reversed before an appeal date was set.

 

as you are a victim of circumstance it would be hard to see why you would be sanctioned but given the peculiar situations that can arise nothing can be discounted

Link to post
Share on other sites

So lets say for instance they applied a 6month sanction?

 

I would be loathed to attend the biweekly sign ons for 6 months for nothing.

 

Lets say I appealed and the sanction stood. What would happen if I stopped attending?

 

Still have not heard anything. Another thing, my father is gifting me very generously £500 a month to help out. This is an informal arrangement from his personal account to mine. Should I declare this? The council picked up on it with my claim from them but a letter from my dad to them stating it was a gift was sufficient.

 

I do not think there was any field in my original application covering gifts like this. I guess this might only matter if I required income based JSA?

 

Thanks for all the help so far.

 

I have an interview next week. Hopefully I will get that job and all this will no longer be a concern!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest jsa12

its very important to sign when appealing as this confirms any award made at an appeal,i didn't catch that about your fathers offer ,if there is a sanction you can depending on any savings and as you may have no means is to apply for hardship payments this will still allow any council tax benefits free prescriptions and dental care these costs soon mount and when these are lost you need good money to cover them.

 

its very important that you do appeal stand firm as none of this fluke circumstance is your doing everyone has changed jobs at some point there's nothing wrong with that,does it mean if i left a permanent job (name only these days') and took a temporary and was laid off and its happened i would lose benefits of course not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...